Connect with us

E-Business

HP Top Cybersecurity Predictions for the Year

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By HP Inc. Security Experts & Advisors

From ransomware pile-ons to increasingly commoditized supply chain TTPs, weaponized firmware exploits and targeted attacks on hybrid workers – the threat landscape is set to evolve at a worrying pace this year.

As 2021 drew to a close, our HP security experts and advisors reflected on what the year 2022 has in store. Here, we include insights from a range of HP security experts – including: Michael Heywood, Supply Chain Security Lead; Joanna Burkey, CISO; Dr. Ian Pratt, Global Head of Security for Personal Systems; Patrick Schläpfer, Malware Analyst; Alex Holland, Senior Malware Analyst; Julia Voo, Global Lead Cybersecurity and Tech Policy; and Michael Howard, Head of Security and Analytics Practice; alongside HP Security Advisory Board member and Partner at Deloitte, Robert Masse – identifying four key trends to look out for.

  1. Increasing commoditization of software supply chain attacks could result in more high-profile victims targeted

Supply chain attacks are likely to continue to present new opportunities for threat actors in 2022. According to Michael Heywood: “We’ll see supply chain attacks continue to rise in 2022 as threat actors search for weak links in software supply chains, targeting software being used widely and globally, or used by a specific company.”

As Joanna Burkey explains, this approach could create economies of scale for threat actors: “With the Kaseya breach – which impacted over 1,500 companies – we saw that supply chain attacks can be financially rewarding. This could lead to the continued commoditization of the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used to conduct such attacks. This only adds fuel to the fire, giving threat actors more than enough motivation to exploit software supply chains this year.”

Ian Pratt says both SMBs and high-profile victims may be targeted: “Kaseya demonstrated a pathway to monetization for independent software vendor (ISV) breaches. This should be a wakeup call to all ISVs that even if their customer base doesn’t consist of enterprise and government customers, they can still be caught in the crosshairs of attackers looking to exploit their customers. Now that this blueprint is in place, we could see these types of attack become more widespread this year, targeting both SMBs and high-profile names.”

Some verticals are more likely to be targets of supply chain attacks than others, as Robert Masse explains: “Healthcare firms, as well as those in Energy and Resources (E&R), that use lots of different hardware and software from various vendors will be interesting targets for software supply chain attacks. Supply chain integrity will be vital in 2022, as attackers begin launching attacks quicker than organizations can invest in secure software development cycles.”

Organizations should also be aware of the threat posed by vulnerabilities in open-source software, as Patrick Schläpfer explains: “We’ll see an increase in open-source software packages containing malicious code. Attackers will proactively inject new threats into open-source libraries that feed into software supply chains. This could lead to more companies being compromised, regardless of whether they have a secure perimeter or good overall posture.”

  1. Ransomware gangs could put lives at risk and engage in ‘pile-ons’

Ransomware will continue to be a major risk this year, with victims potentially being hit more than once, as Burkey outlines: “What we’ll see will be akin to ‘social media pile-ons’, with ransomware victims repeatedly targeted by threat actors. Once an organization has been shown to be ‘soft’, others will pile-on to get their share of the action. In some instances, threat actors will hit a company multiple times in double or even triple dip extortion rackets.”

Extortion methods could also extend beyond the victim as ransomware gangs apply the pressure, comments Alex Holland: “Ransomware operators will almost certainly intensify the ways they pressure victims into paying their demands. Beyond data leak websites, attackers are using increasingly varied extortion methods, such as cold calling, and contacting customers and business associates of victim organizations.”

“Heywood highlights that ransomware gangs won’t just encrypt data, they will steal it too, turning the screws on victims: “As we have seen in 2021, threat actors will continue stealing data before encrypting devices, putting pressure on victims to pay ransoms to unencrypt systems, and prevent the release of data.”

Threat actors could also focus on specific verticals and use cases, as highlighted by Masse: “Attackers have noticed that hitting certain industries will produce a higher likelihood of payment. We could see more attacks on healthcare and E&R organizations.

“Threat actors may well target high risk devices, such as critical medical support systems and their supporting infrastructure, where the risk of significant harm will be highest and therefore a payout will come quickly. This has already started to happen in regions such as Canada, with surgeries being delayed due to ransomware attacks.”

The trend of cooperation between threat actors will continue this year too, as Pratt explains: “We’ve seen time and time again that threat actors are willing to cooperate on attacks. There is a vibrant cybercrime marketplace, empowering a criminal supply chain that enables even unsophisticated threat actors to obtain the tools and services needed to launch successful campaigns.

“Vendors may specialize in stealing credentials, creating exploits, writing email lures, or hosting backend services. The bottom line is that the availability of tools and expertise is enabling the sophistication of criminal attacks to rise.”

  1. Weaponization of firmware attacks will lower the bar for entry

Masse believes a lack of visibility and control over firmware security will exacerbate the issue: “Certain industries where these attacks could be more probable should start thinking about the risks posed by the weaponization of hardware-level malware and exploits.

“They are very difficult to detect even in the best-case scenario. Rogue processes and memory mapping bypasses will be hot topics in 2022, and we can also expect to see threat actors targeting CPUs, the BIOS and microcode as part of a revised kill-chain for ransomware attacks.”

Policy makers should take note of this trend and enforce change, according to Julia Voo: “The weaponization of hardware-level exploits means that policy makers must step in to develop standards that can help to improve firmware security. By working with industry through a bottom-up approach, policy makers can drive meaningful change in an area that has largely been overlooked.”

  1. Hybrid work and sporting events will create more opportunities to attack users

The distribution of teams within hybrid working models means identity management will continue to play a key role, as Burkey highlights: “Identity must be solid, verified and robust. Organizations need to make sure that every activity coming from an endpoint is authentic. Is it really the user conducting these activities? Are they who they say they are? Too many organizations think being behind a firewall is enough to keep an endpoint safe, but this isn’t true. In the era of hybrid work, identity management will never be more important.”

The shift to hybrid work will also continue to create problems for organizational security, says Michael Howard: “Every single employee remains a target for attackers, with the volume of unmanaged and unsecure devices creating a huge attack surface to defend.” Masse believes this could make it easier for attackers to go after high-profile staff: “Threat actors could start to target the homes and personal networks of top executives, even government officials, as these networks are easier to compromise than traditional enterprise environments.”

Phishing will remain an ever-present threat in the era of hybrid work, Pratt explains: “Employees have been using personal devices for work or corporate devices for personal tasks, like checking emails. This will continue, and it’s likely there will be an increase in phishing attacks targeting both corporate and personal email accounts. This essentially doubles attackers’ chances of launching a successful attack, so organizations need to educate the workforce on the risks of their behavior and enforce technical controls to prevent compromise.”

High-profile sporting events will also present new opportunities for attackers to target users, according to Schläpfer: “The Winter Olympics in Beijing and FIFA World Cup in Qatar give threat actors plenty of scope for exploitation. Such large events attract opportunistic attackers, be it a direct attack on organizers, sponsors, participants and fans, or as phishing lures for malware and ransomware campaigns targeted at users. Organizations and individuals alike need to be aware of the risks.”

A new approach to security is needed

“The rise of hybrid working and continued innovation from threat actors means 2022 has plenty of nasty surprises in store for enterprise security,” comments Ian Pratt. “As a result, we need to go about securing the future of work in an entirely different way. Organizations should embrace a new architectural approach to security that helps to mitigate risk and enable resilience.

“By applying the principles of Zero Trust – least privilege access, isolation, mandatory access control and strong identity management – organizations can drastically reduce the attack surface and secure the future of work.”

HP Wolf Security can help organizations defend against the plethora of new attacks and risks facing them in 2022. By combining hardware-enforced software and security features with industry-leading endpoint security services, HP Wolf Security provides defense-in-depth and enhanced protection, privacy, and threat intelligence, gathering data at the endpoint to help protect the business at large.


Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

E-Business

Survey Shows Gaps in Cybersecurity Policies and Employee Commitment Leave Organisations Vulnerable

Published

on

Kindly share this post

A recent Kaspersky survey entitled “Cybersecurity in the workplace: Employee knowledge and behaviour”, showed that 39% of professionals in the Middle East, Turkiye and Africa (META) region, consider cybersecurity rules in their company to be excessive or not fully appropriate.

While 7% noted that their organisations do not have cybersecurity rules or that they are not aware of them. These results show a disconnect between corporate cybersecurity policies and employee commitment to these rules, underscoring the risks associated with shadow IT and unmanaged device usage in the workplace.

Shadow IT is defined as the use of unauthorised software, devices, or services without IT oversight, and it has evolved into a critical business risk. While often driven by employee productivity needs, it creates blind spots for IT departments.

The rise of hybrid work environments, increased reliance on cloud-based tools and the spread of AI tools have accelerated this trend. Without robust cybersecurity management and oversight, organisations face heightened exposure to ransomware attacks, data leaks, and regulatory penalties.

19% of survey respondents in the META region said there are no policies regarding the use of non-corporate devices in their company. 35% of employees admitted that they can use their own devices to access business information, provided they have some type of cybersecurity protection, even consumer-grade software.

On the positive side, 21% said they can use their own device, but these must first pass more stringent corporate IT security checks; while 25% of respondents indicated that only devices provided by the IT function can be used for work purposes.

The situation is significantly better with permissions for employees to install software on corporate devices without IT department’s approval. 50% reported that only IT specialists in their company are allowed to install software, while in 31% of organisations only top management or designated users can do so. 11% of employees can install software that is approved by the IT team. However, 8% of respondents said that all users can install any software they need without IT agreement in their organisation.

At the same time 21% of professionals surveyed acknowledged that within the past year they installed software on their work devices without IT supervision. That highlights a persistent shadow IT challenge that continues to expose organisations to security vulnerabilities, compliance risks, and data breaches.

“Shadow IT is now a mainstream operational risk. When one in five employees installs software without IT oversight, it signals a policy gap. Many organisations already have security policies in place, but employee perception must also be considered.

Organisations should move beyond restrictive controls and instead implement intelligent, user-centric cybersecurity strategies that combine strategies that integrate technology with employee awareness and responsible use,” said Toufic Derbass, Managing Director for the META region at Kaspersky.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Microsoft Faces £1.7Bn Cloud Lawsuit in UK over Alleged Market Abuse

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Microsoft is facing a £1.7 billion ($2.3 billion) class action lawsuit in the United Kingdom over allegations that it abused its dominant market position in cloud computing.

Microsoft Faces £1.7bn Cloud Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Market Abuse

Microsoft

The case, filed before the Competition Appeal Tribunal, was brought by Maria Luisa Stasi on behalf of about 59,000 British businesses and organisations. It alleges that Microsoft unfairly imposed higher costs on customers running its Windows Server software on rival cloud platforms.

Stasi said the company’s practices have had a significant financial impact on both public and private sector organisations over several years.

In allowing the case to proceed, the tribunal ruled that it has a “reasonable prospect of success.” The judges noted that Microsoft is alleged to have abused its dominance in the paid server operating system market to undermine competition in the cloud services space.

If the claim succeeds, compensation for affected organisations is estimated to range between £1.7 billion and £2.1 billion.

Microsoft has rejected the allegations and confirmed it will appeal the ruling. A company spokesperson said the decision does not represent a final judgment on the claims and that it disputes the substance of the case.

The lawsuit comes as regulators in the UK and the European Union intensify scrutiny of Microsoft’s cloud business practices. UK authorities are currently assessing whether the company should be designated as having “strategic market status,” a move that would subject it to stricter competition rules.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Government, Industrial Sectors became the Primary Targets for Cybercriminals in 2025 – Report

Published

on

Kindly share this post

According to the global report by Kaspersky Security Services ‘Anatomy of a Cyber World’, the government sector has emerged as the most targeted sector for the second consecutive year, accounting for 19% of all high-severity incidents in 2025.

The industrial sector closely followed at 17%, while the IT sector rose to third place with 15%, displacing finance from the top three targeted industries.

The ‘Anatomy of a Cyber World’ is a comprehensive global report drawing on incident statistics from Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response, Kaspersky Incident Response, Kaspersky Compromise Assessment and Kaspersky SOC Consulting.

This report sheds light on the most prevalent attacker tactics, techniques and tools, as well as the characteristics of detected incidents and their distribution across regions and industry sectors.

Building on these findings, the report reveals that government bodies continued to be the most targeted sector in 2025. A deeper examination of the root causes of attacks within this sector uncovers that Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) were the most common, accounting for 33,3% of incidents.

This trend highlights the increasing sophistication of adversaries who persistently evolve their tactics to bypass automated protection. Additionally, 18,9% of government organisations experienced social engineering attacks, underscoring that employees remain a critical entry point for cyber threats.

This dual vulnerability, from both advanced persistent attackers and social engineering campaigns, underscores the need to strengthen not only technology but also organisational resilience.

Implementing measures such as role-based access control and limiting privileges can significantly reduce the impact of compromised accounts, particularly in large, distributed government environments.

The industrial sector presents a different but equally concerning profile. Threats in industrial environments are distributed with striking uniformity: APT-driven incidents constitute 17,8%, malware 14,9% and social engineering 13,9%.

This pattern suggests that industrial organisations attract a broad range of adversaries with different capabilities and objectives, rather than being primarily targeted by a single type of threat actor. Notably, confirmed cyber exercises like red teaming accounts for 22,8% of incidents in the sector, the highest share among the top three industries, reflecting growing investment in proactive security validation among industrial organisations.

In contrast, the IT sector shows a markedly different pattern. With 41% of incidents attributed to human-driven APT attacks, the highest rate across all sectors, IT organisations are clearly a priority target for sophisticated threat actors seeking to exploit trusted relationships and scale their impact through supply chains.

APT traces, which are artifacts from previous advanced persistent threat activity, were identified in an additional 17% of cases, while social engineering accounted for 11%. In contrast, red teaming represents only 9% of IT incidents, suggesting that proactive security testing remains underutilised relative to the sector’s actual threat exposure.

Interestingly, the finance sector was displaced from the top three targeted industries. According to the report, red teaming in this sector accounts for 36,1% of incidents, reflecting a mature, compliance-driven approach to proactive defence, while confirmed APT activity remains comparatively low at 11,5%.

This pattern indicates that sustained investment in security assessment can effectively enhance a company’s ability to identify vulnerabilities early, avoiding costly breaches and reducing the risk of significant damage to reputation and operations.

“Government, industrial and IT organisations consistently attract sophisticated adversaries because of the strategic value of what they hold, operate and connect to geopolitical intelligence, critical infrastructure and global supply chains respectively. The 2025 data confirms that these attacks are not opportunistic: they are targeted and often aimed at establishing persistent access.

Each of these sectors needs to operate on the assumption that determined attackers will find a way in, and focus their defences on early detection, rapid containment and minimising the window of exposure. So, proactive threat hunting, continuous monitoring and regular compromise assessments are no longer optional for organisations of any size across these industries,” comments Sergey Soldatov, Head of Security Operations at Kaspersky.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending