Connect with us

Telecom

Indo-Africa ICT Expo, Nigeria to Cooperate with India on ICT – Minister

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Barr.Adebayo Shittu, Minister of Communications has assured of Nigeria’s readiness to forge closer cooperation with India, to achieve meaningful growth in the ICT sector.

 

Shittu made this known in Abuja while briefing newsmen about the proposed 4th edition of the Indo-Africa ICT conference and expo organised by Indian High Commission.

 

This year’s edition is scheduled to hold from May 22 to May 23 in Lagos.

Advertisement

 

According to the Minister, this expo is very important because its being organised at a time Nigeria had made investment in its ICT at the front burner.

 

Adebayo said “Nigeria being the fastest growing ICT market and with a young population that have capacity and innovative mind, we stand to partner and learn from India.

 

Advertisement

“The Federal Government’s campaign on encouragement and patronage of locally produced goods and services is on course.

 

“Government also put the spotlight on local manufacturers when, via three strategic executive orders, it compelled MDA’s to channel at least 40 per cents of procurement to locally-made goods and services.

 

“This expo will enable Nigeria’s start-ups, entrepreneurs and businesses to form partnerships with their foreign counterpart and pitch innovative creations for public/commercial acceptance.

Advertisement

 

“Government is more than ever before prepared to patronise made-in Nigeria goods, instead of buying foreign products, to grow faster and stimulate economic growth.”

 

Adebayo urged Indian investors to key into the numerous untapped resources and huge potential market in the country, to promote business cooperation between the two countries.

 

Advertisement

He described Nigeria to be among the fastest growing markets in African and by extension the world that had improved in macroeconomic indicator, comfortable business environment and population.

 

He, however, reiterated that the nation’s policy thrust is to step with reality of digital and fourth revolution, create viable environment for investment in network infrastructure.

 

Earlier, the High Commissioner of India to Nigeria, Mr Shri Reddy, said that the Third edition of the event took place in Lagos in September 2017

Advertisement

 

According to him, the holding of the 4th edition of the expo is reflective of commitment of India to engage with African countries, to promote use of ICTs in national economic development.

 

Reddy said “the choice of Lagos for this event for a second time is a recognition of the vast potentials that exists in Nigeria.

 

Advertisement

“It is also because of the nation’s importance as gateway to the West-Africa and other parts of the continent.”

 

He said that India and Africa would forge closer cooperation in an effort to accelerate growth in ICT with the view to boost economies through the use of advanced technologies and services.

 

He said that ICT would provide business opportunity for local entrepreneurs to pitch their solutions and products to over 50 Indian companies expected to attend the forthcoming event.

Advertisement

 

The expo is an initiative of Telecom Equipment and Services Export Promotion Council (TECP), an organisation set-up by government of India, to promote telecom services.

 

 

 

Advertisement

Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Telecom

Starbase Technologies Introduces Yolly, a Reward-Based Social Entertainment Platform

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Starbase Technologies has launched Yolly, a new social entertainment platform designed to reward users for watching, streaming and creating content while promoting wholesome digital engagement.

Starbase Technologies Introduces Yolly, a Reward-Based Social Entertainment Platform

Starbase Technologies

The company said the platform was developed to redefine participation in the digital economy by enabling viewers, creators and brands to earn value from meaningful online interactions.

According to Starbase Technologies, Yolly introduces a reward system powered by Stars, its native digital rewards currency, which users accumulate through activities such as watching videos, live streaming and creating content.

The company said the initiative was built on the belief that everyone contributing to the digital ecosystem should have the opportunity to benefit from the value they help generate.

Unlike conventional social media platforms where monetisation is often restricted to creators with large followings, Yolly allows creators to begin earning from their first stream without meeting follower thresholds.

The platform also provides emerging creators with features including gifting, Boosts and a Founder Creator badge to help them grow their communities from the outset.

Advertisement

Viewers are also eligible to earn Stars through the platform’s Watch+ feature, which rewards users for watching content from their first session.

For brands, the company said Yolly offers an alternative to traditional impression-based advertising by providing verified engagement metrics, real-time performance dashboards and brand safety controls to improve campaign measurement and audience interaction.

Speaking on the launch, the Head of Business at Yolly, Emeka Okenwa, said the platform was designed to create a more inclusive and rewarding creator economy.

He said the rewards ecosystem prioritises wholesome content and genuine community engagement rather than content driven solely by algorithms or viral trends.

“The platform has been developed on the premise that the future of the creator economy should be more inclusive, more rewarding and built around genuine communities rather than algorithms alone,” Okenwa said.

Advertisement

He added that Yolly was created to encourage family-friendly content while providing viewers, creators and brands with a trusted environment to connect, create and grow.

According to the company, the platform features content across entertainment, sports, lifestyle, education, technology and live events.

Starbase Technologies said the launch forms part of its broader vision of connecting creators and innovators through technology solutions that expand opportunities within the global digital economy.

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

Isolation Is Economic Suicide – Jonas Warns Stronger African Nations Against Self-Delusion

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Mcebisi Jonas, Chairman of MTN Group, has called on African leaders and businesses to deepen regional cooperation, warning that no country on the continent can achieve lasting prosperity in isolation.

Isolation Is Economic Suicide - Jonas Warns Stronger African Nations Against Self-Delusion

Mcebisi Jonas, Chairman of MTN Group

Jonas made the call during the MTN Y’ello Chair event held on Aug. 2, where he urged Africa’s largest economies to work together to unlock the continent’s economic potential.

He said the fortunes of businesses operating across Africa were closely linked to the continent’s overall economic performance.

“Our fortunes as MTN are intertwined with the fortunes of the continent. If the continent goes down, we go down. If the continent is lifted up, we also are lifted up,” he said.

According to him, corporate success cannot be sustained where regional economies remain weak or fragmented.

Jonas cautioned major African economies, particularly Nigeria and South Africa, against adopting inward-looking economic policies, stressing that their long-term prosperity depends on stronger collaboration with neighbouring countries.

Advertisement

“If the continent is to be propelled beyond where it is, trade between South Africa and Nigeria must improve.

“If the big economies of the continent are not working together, are not aligned in terms of agenda and are not trading with each other, then you have a problem,” he said.

He advocated the creation of a pragmatic coalition of Africa’s leading economies, comparable to the Group of Seven (G7), to coordinate economic priorities, strengthen regional integration and accelerate development across the continent.

Jonas also called for increased investment in cross-border infrastructure, including energy, transport, logistics and financial systems, to facilitate trade and improve economic resilience.

According to him, Africa’s long-term growth will depend on its ability to function as a cohesive and interconnected economic bloc.

Advertisement

Recent trade figures indicate growing commercial activity within the continent.

According to the African Trade Report 2025 published by the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank), intra-African trade increased by 12.4 per cent to 220.3 billion dollars in 2024.

The report showed that South Africa remained the continent’s largest intra-African trading nation with 42.14 billion dollars in trade, while Nigeria’s intra-African trade rose significantly to 18.43 billion dollars, from 8.1 billion dollars recorded in the previous year.

Despite the progress, Jonas noted that regulatory bottlenecks, infrastructure deficits and other cross-border barriers continued to limit the full potential of trade among African countries.

He urged governments to pursue policies that encourage greater regional integration, describing continental cooperation as essential for sustainable economic development.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

Adefolarin Ogunsanya and the Allegations of Shareholder Interference and Self-dealing @Pan African Towers

Published

on

Kindly share this post

As multiple legal disputes arising from the acquisition of Pan African Towers unfold before Nigerian courts, one name consistently appears across the proceedings: Adefolarin Ogunsanya.

Court filings involving the Board Chairman and DPI partner raise broader questions about shareholder influence, corporate governance and executive independence following the 2023 acquisition.

The relationship did not begin in conflict. According to court filings, former Pan African Towers CEO Azeez Amida played a leading role in identifying and engaging investors after the company’s shareholders decided to pursue a sale.

The filings state that negotiations led by Amida culminated in the acquisition of Pan African Towers by Development Partners International (DPI), Verod Capital Growth Fund III LP and African Development Partners International LLP in a transaction later recognised as African Deal of the Year. Less than three years later, the same acquisition has become the subject of three separate court cases, bringing its governance arrangements under judicial scrutiny.

According to separate Federal High Court filings, the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) was more than a compensation proposal—it was a key factor in Amida’s decision to select the DPI, Verod and African Development Partners consortium to join him in acquiring Pan African Towers from Chapel Hill Denham, Nigeria Infrastructure Debt Fund and Prime Infrastructure West Africa.

Advertisement

The affidavit states that Amida held discussions with several investment firms before ultimately recommending the consortium.

He alleges that he made it clear from the outset that management would retain a minimum 5% equity interest following the acquisition, a proposal the consortium accepted through the MIP and accompanying Term Sheets. According to the pleadings, that arrangement distinguished the consortium from competing investors and ultimately secured Amida’s support for the transaction.

The court documents place Board Chairman Adefolarin Ogunsanya at the centre of those negotiations. Among the exhibits is an email from Ogunsanya forwarding a document titled “PAT – MIP analysis.xlsx,” described as “an excel working of the incentive scheme,” together with an invitation to walk Amida through the proposed structure.

The MIP projected that Amida’s proposed 5% equity participation could generate returns exceeding $30 million, which he alleges formed a significant part of his decision to proceed with the consortium.

According to the claimant, those equity arrangements were never implemented after the acquisition closed, giving rise to the separate Federal High Court action in which he seeks damages exceeding $30 million.

Advertisement

DPI, Verod and their respective limited partners are yet to file a substantive defence more than twelve months after the suit was commenced.

According to filings governance tensions emerge after acquisition which Amida’s defence is in contention that governance dynamics changed significantly after the acquisition.

The filings allege that shareholder representatives and board members became increasingly involved in operational matters ordinarily reserved for executive management, particularly procurement and commercial negotiations, including advocating sourcing decisions involving companies in which they held interests.

The defence identifies Board Chairman Adefolarin Ogunsanya as one of the directors involved in those discussions, alleging that governance and procurement disagreements became a defining feature of the relationship between management and the new ownership structure. Those allegations remain disputed and will ultimately be determined by the court.

According to the filings, following the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer, Amida deliberately stepped away from final expenditure approvals because of governance concerns and the potential for conflicts of interest.

Advertisement

Instead, the defence states that payments followed the company’s established approval process, with departmental reviews culminating in final approval by the Chief Financial Officer, who was hired by the consortium and remains in the company till date.

The defence argues that many of the expenditures now challenged were processed under that framework. It further notes that the Chief Financial Officer responsible for those approvals remains with Pan African Towers and has since been promoted, a fact Amida contends is relevant to the court’s assessment of responsibility for the approval process.

The defence disputes that the transactions were unilateral decisions by the former CEO, arguing that the expenditures passed through multiple approval layers involving Human Resources, Finance, Procurement, Executive Management and, where necessary, the Board. Internal emails, approval workflows, WhatsApp communications and financial records have been listed among the evidence to be relied upon at trial.

The defence further contends that the hospitality, investor engagement and related business expenses were recognised in the company’s audited financial statements and approved through established corporate processes before later becoming the subject of litigation.

Board Chairman Adefolarin Ogunsanya’s recurring role across the various proceedings is one of the more notable features of the litigation.

Advertisement

According to the pleadings, he participated in negotiations surrounding the Management Incentive Plan, later signed the October 2024 query issued to Amida before the Mutual Separation Agreement, and subsequently declined a demand for an amicable settlement in the National Industrial Court dispute.

Amida now alleges that Pan African Towers’ Federal High Court action is retaliatory and intended to pressure him in connection with his earlier proceedings against DPI, Verod and other parties involved in the acquisition. Those allegations remain contested and will ultimately be determined by the courts.

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending