E-Financial
Payment Service Banks in Nigeria, Lessons from the Past

By Emmanuel Okoegwale
Ten years ago, there was great optimism that the licensing of mobile money providers will usher in a new era in the drive for greater financial inclusion and fill the vacuum that the banks failed to fill for many years.
Ten Years after, the country has recorded some decent incremental improvements in the financial services sector through the mobile money operators but not the expected transformational leap, we had hope for. On the march again, the country has created a new category of financial services providers to be called, Payment service Banks.
The CBN in furtherance of its mandate to deepen financial inclusion in Nigeria is actively seeking to license Payment Service Banks in Nigeria which had been similarly deployed in other jurisdictions such as India.
Both countries are similar in areas of regulation that excluded mobile networks from mobile money and Banks that are cannot fill in the gaps, in serving the hard to reach places.
What’s difference between PSB and mobilemoney?
Permissible services for both in Nigeria are similar with few advantages for the PSB such as ability to mobilize deposits from individuals and small businesses, issue debit and pre-paid cards, invest in FGN bonds while both cannot give out loans, provide insurance underwriting and trade on foreign exchange market. No cap was mentioned in the framework on deposits mobilization allowed for PSBs.
Many reasons had been raised for the slow uptake of mobile money in Nigeria from low capitalized operations, fragmented agency network, exclusion of mobile network operators and some underlying bottlenecks like extensive delays in granting mass access channels like USSD and Sim tool kit channels to mobile money operators, were major hindrances to early take off and adoption.
The operational levers to drive a successful deployment are network effects, lack of financial access points in many rural areas, available mass market access channels, heavy marketing, channel leverage and incentives to drive last mile operations.
These are domain areas of mobile networks and these are some of the levers that mobile money operators lacked in India and Nigeria because they are non-Telcos however some of them, still managed to keep their heads, above the waters.
The Indian story so far
In 2015, 11 organizations were approved to commence payment service Bank services in India however three dropped out even before launch, with one of them citing, increased competition and time to recover profit on investments.
Some of the operators had been clamped by the regulator, due to inappropriate Know-you-customer implementation and some of the providers struggle to convert their huge subscriber base as envisaged to bank customers, the license also excluded the providers from lending.
Due to its limited offering, the commercial viability was no longer appealing to providers hence they struggle to stay afloat.
Shape of things to come in Nigeria
As Africa’s most populous nation, prepares to soften the ground for mobile network operators to participate in the financial services sector which had predominantly been the turf of the banks, it will be interesting to see how they will successfully convert their network assets to serve the large unbanked population in the country.
With MTN Nigeria woes seeming to be coming to an end over tax dispute with the Central bank of Nigeria and a planned listing on the Nigerian Stock Exchange later this year and armed with an approval -in-principle to launch payment service Bank, it will be the honey on the cookie pie for local and international stock investors.
The challenge non-telco operators of PSB will face, will be similar and may even be more than what the mobile money operators faced with them in the early days and even till date.
Why will the mobile network operator give equal-footing access to a competitor? What will the regulator do to enforce fair competition? What are the risk of granting non-telcos PSB licenses only for them to face similar challenges faced by licensed mobile money operators for ten years?
Some recommendations
The regulator may consider to upgrade some of the mobile money operator’s license to PSB if they have proven ability, maybe on a regional basis so that they don’t have spread themselves very thin to compete with what will be a significant competition (mobile networks) with lower paid-up capital requirements to compensate for their investment as frontier providers.
Addition of retail and low value lending approval to their license while they isolate the customer deposit pool if possible or allow only for a small percentage of the deposit pool for retail lending.
A proper assessment of non-telco and non-mobile money applicants for the PSB license to ensure they have compelling business cases, well capitalized and ability to overcome the challenges that almost muscled the mobile money operators in the last ten years.
In view of many initiatives in the market place that are driven largely by industry associations and regulations, innovations should be allowed to rather drive these initiatives, fair completion are enforced by the regulator for all technology access channels from telcos and access to government standard setting agencies for BVN, National ID for robust KYC and risk management purposes.
Emmanuel Okoegwale is Principal Associate, MobileMoneyAfrica
E-Financial
CBN Proposes 30-Member Mediation Panel for Loan Disputes

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has released an exposure draft proposing the establishment of a 30-member Mediation and Dispute Resolution Panel (MDRP) aimed at strengthening consumer protection and boosting confidence in Nigeria’s financial system.

Pic credit….aequitasjuris.com
According to a circular signed by Paul Oluikpe, acting director of the Development Finance Advisory Department of the CBN, the establishment of the MDRP, is in furtherance of efforts to strengthen the financial ecosystem, ensure compliance with extant legislation, and enhance the efficiency of financial intermediation.
The draft guidelines and modalities for the operation of the MDRP are in line with the Secured Transactions in Movable Assets (STMA) Act, 2017, which established a MDRP as the first recourse for mediation and settlement over any civil dispute which may arise between the creditor and the grantor in the course of implementing the Act.
The act also mandates the Governor of the Bank to issue guidelines that will set out the modalities and regulate the Panel’s functioning, among others. The circular further noted that the “MDRP is intended to provide a specialised, cost-effective platform for resolving disputes arising from creation, perfection and enforcement of security interests in movable assets.
“The key objective of the MDRP guidelines is to establish a clear and standardised procedure for managing STMA-related disputes, while ensuring transparency, fairness and efficiency to bolster confidence in the secured transactions in movable assets system.”
According to the draft guideline, the CBN will “appoint 30 persons from whom panels shall be constituted, with each panel comprising 3 members.
The members shall serve on a rotational basis for an initial term of four years.
“Upon satisfactory performance, determined through an evaluation by the CBN, members may be reappointed for an additional term of four years. The tenure of members shall not exceed two terms of four years each, which need not be consecutive.
“Members shall be professionals with a minimum of 10 years of relevant experience in any of law, banking, finance, mediation, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, or financial regulation. Members shall be persons of proven integrity, professional competence and sound judgement.”
E-Financial
NDIC Seeks Court Nods to Liquidate 89 Failed Banks

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) said that it has commenced the process of liquidating 89 closed Microfinance Banks (MFBs) and Primary Mortgage Banks (PMBs).

This followed their successful acquisition by new owners under the Purchase and Assumption (P&A) resolution model executed by the Corporation.
The corporation disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday, signed by Hawwau Gambo, head of Communication and Public Affairs.
It explained that the affected institutions were part of the 179 MFBs and four PMBs whose licences were revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), on May 22 and 23, 2023.
According to the corporation, under the P&A arrangement, 89 new eligible institutions were subsequently licensed by the CBN to assume the assets and liabilities of the defunct banks.
It noted that the new banks had since commenced operations under different names.
“To legally conclude the liquidation process, the NDIC, in its capacity as liquidator, will file applications at various divisions of the Federal High Court for orders of dissolution of the closed banks and its discharge as liquidator,” the statement said.
NDIC added that the move was in line with provisions of its enabling Act and other relevant laws guiding bank resolution in the country.
The corporation said the exercise would ensure proper closure of the defunct institutions while safeguarding financial system stability.
It reiterated its commitment to protecting depositors and sustaining public confidence in the banking sector.
The affected banks were located across several states, including Lagos, Anambra, Oyo, Kaduna, Kano and the Federal Capital Territory.
E-Financial
IMF Downgrades Nigeria’s GDP Outlook, Warns of Rising Risks

Nigeria’s economy is projected to grow at 4.1 per cent in 2026 and strengthen slightly to 4.3 per cent in 2027, even as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that the ongoing Middle East conflict is clouding the global outlook.

The projections, contained in the IMF’s April 2026 World Economic Outlook released at the ongoing IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings in Washington DC, the United States, show a relatively stable trajectory for Nigeria despite rising external risks, particularly from energy market disruptions triggered by the war.
The IMF had earlier projected stronger growth of about 4.4 per cent in early January before the latest global shock, reflecting the impact of domestic reforms and improving macroeconomic conditions.
While Nigeria’s growth outlook remains steady, the IMF warned that countries like Nigeria face growing vulnerability from higher global energy prices, inflation pressures and tighter financial conditions.
The war, which has disrupted oil supply routes and pushed up fuel costs, is already feeding into domestic inflation and cost-of-living pressures.
Recent data show petrol and diesel prices have surged sharply since the conflict began, straining households and businesses.
Although higher crude prices may support government revenues, the broader macroeconomic impact remains mixed, with inflation and exchange rate pressures posing downside risks.
The IMF also cut global growth to 3.1 per cent in 2026, with only a modest recovery to 3.2 per cent in 2027 as the Middle East conflict disrupts trade and energy markets.
Emerging markets and developing economies, including Nigeria, are expected to grow at 3.9 per cent this year before recovering to 4.2 per cent in 2027, reflecting the uneven impact of the shock across regions.
Sub-Saharan Africa is projected to expand by 4.3 per cent in 2026 and 4.4 per cent in 2027, placing Nigeria slightly below the regional average but still among the stronger performers.
South Africa, the continent’s largest economy, continues to lag with growth forecast at one per cent in 2026, rising modestly to 1.3 per cent in 2027.
Among major economies, the U.S. is projected to grow by 2.3 per cent in 2026 before easing to 2.1 per cent in 2027, while China is projected to grow by 4.4 per cent and four per cent respectively.
India remains the fastest-growing major economy at 6.5 per cent through 2027, while the Euro Area continues to struggle with weak growth, particularly in Germany and France.
The IMF warned that many developing economies, particularly energy importers, remain vulnerable to rising costs and external shocks.
The IMF urged central banks to prioritise price stability, warning against easing policy prematurely in response to supply shocks. It stressed the need for clear communication and strong institutional independence.
On fiscal policy, the Fund cautioned against broad-based energy subsidies, describing them as costly and inefficient. It recommended a targeted and temporary support for vulnerable households, funded within existing budgets.
The IMF also warned against the use of trade restrictions to address external imbalances, noting that such measures tend to weaken output without resolving underlying issues. It called instead for coordinated global action to stabilise trade and restore energy supply chains.
E-Financial3 days agoFidelity Surges Ahead in Recapitalisation Drive with ₦564bn Capital
General News2 days agoGuinness Nigeria Surpasses ₦1Trillion Market Capitalisation, Signalling Strong Investor Confidence and Sustained Value Creation
Telecom3 days agoAfDB Grants Project BRIDGE $200m Facility for Nationwide Internet Access
Telecom3 days agoQualcomm Unveils Startup Selection for Qualcomm Make in Africa 2026
E-Financial3 days agoDigital “Pickpockets” Compromise Over a Million Banking Accounts – Kaspersky
Telecom3 days agoNigeria Seeks Stronger Digital Sovereignty, National Software Infrastructure
E-Business3 days agoNigeria Needs Some 480,000 Local DPOs for Data Protection
E-Financial3 days agoEFCC Warns Banks against Loans without Credible Collateral















