Telecom

Social Pressure Bane of Poor QoS- Operators

Published

17 years ago

November 17, 2008

Kindly share this post

Telecommunications operators especially Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) are faced with quality of service issues. In line with our promise of offering stakeholders in the industry opportunity to be heard, Mr. Gbenga Adebayo, chairman Association of licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (Alton) explains to subscribers and other stakeholders why quality of service is not getting better.

Persistent Poor Quality of Service
The persistent poor quality of service in spite of sanctions by Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) means that the factors responsible for poor service delivery have not been addressed. Unstable power supply remains the major challenge on improving service delivery. Last year a litre of diesel was sold at N80 but today a litre of diesel is sold between N140 and N170 depending on where you buy and where you are transporting it to. Today, the road networks we have in the country is worst than it was a year ago, operators need to move their things by road. This means that if an operator orders diesel in Abuja, he will have to move it to farest part of the North by road, same in West, if diesel is ordered in Lagos it has to be moved to the farest part of the West by road.
Take for instance, Lagos to Ibadan is a journey of about one hour ten minutes when the road is good, but today one spends about five hour on the same road. Operators are not operating outside the social framework of Nigeria. The fact remains that those issues we are faced with two years ago has gone worst by the day, it is convenient to come out and say ‘we blame operators for every thing,’ because operators have the least voice.
More so, blames, sanctions and discipline of operators can’t address the problem until we begin to isolate the problems one after the other, we won’t make any head way. We are concerned as an association, because today, we see more threat to issues of service of quality than we have seen in the years past. Why? Infrastructures that operators have built are now being attacked by contractors of government. Take a drive to Lekki/Epe expressway you see how many fibre cable that has been excavated that are still on the side of the road. Those are infrastructures that were built two years ago not ten or fifteen years ago. The rebuilding of those infrastructures is to be bowed by operators without recourse to the owners. Dualisation, expansion and rehabilitation of roads is going on across the country, operators have laid optic fibre to improve network backbone across the country, those infrastructure are suffering major attack due to road works by contractors of government, without regard to valid ‘right of way’ for which operators paid several millions of naira to government.
You don’t receive any notice that there will be road works all of a sudden network goes down, visit to site or location of failure, government contractors on site. We have contract from Abuja, we are going to dualise the road. To that end, you start the journey of recoil you don’t know how many points of failure. Because they are government contractors you can’t do anything, government has the power, and operators can only count their losses. It is the consumer that suffers at the end of the day.
We have been on Abuja issue for more than three years; there has not been the right number of service stations and cell sites required to cover the traffic in Abuja, not because operators are not willing to do, but authorities there will not allow operators to install cellular stations.
Telecom is terrestrial. It doesn’t work in the air, it works with physical infrastructure and you must lay the infrastructure for it to work. If government refuses to allow operators lay infrastructure in Abuja I wonder how service quality won’t be poor. It is ‘Ok’ for government to say service quality is very poor in Abuja, and can sanction operators from now till tomorrow; if those fundamentals are not addressed we cannot improve service quality.
About stakeholders forum on vandalization
We are glad that the problem is been discussed, which means that the regulator admits that there is problem in that regard. For the fact that Nigerian Communications Commission called stakeholders meeting means that it has been identified now as a problem. All the time we made representation to the government on the challenges of quality of service has been treated with a wave of the hand. They said “what are you talking about? Who is damaging your infrastructure?” Now that the issue is been discussed, it begins to draw attention of government to some of those things we’ve always spoken about that are treat and impact on quality of service. Until such a time when telecom is classified as national security infrastructure it will not deter people from damaging our infrastructure that is what we are clamouring for.
Let it be known that telecom infrastructure is national security infrastructure and we need to enact a law to support that. It is then that people will be deterred from tapering with the infrastructure. In the Nigeria Telecommunications Limited (Nitel) days, there is miscellaneous offenses decree, where people found liable of damaging Nitel and Power Holding Company infrastructure are sentence to long term imprisonment of up to 21 years. Today, nothing is protecting the service providers.
Is it normal for operators to operate their own power networks? Is also normal to operate under the kind of environment that we operate? Where people go to site and bring down infrastructure on site with impunity, stealing of diesel, generators as well as critical components on cell site. These things that are stolen are sold in the market.
Today, telecom service providers run their main core telecom networks; we run electricity network and diesel supply network and all other kinds of support services to backup the infrastructure. It is difficulty. Until these fundamentals are addressed, we will continue to talk about quality of service.
Another issue is that some states and local government have all kinds of revenue laws that service providers must comply with, failure to comply results in we not accessing our sites, our vehicles cannot move in those States, we can’t maintain existing sites and fibre networks.
Let government do its own, we will do our own. Part of responsibilities of government is to provide enabling environment and to protect operators in the environment. If you go to central Lagos area, when you land a diesel truck, there you have to pay for landing the truck, when you discharge you have to pay for discharging the truck, and when you are taking away the truck from site you have to as well pay for taking away the truck from site. It is called dispatch money; otherwise you don’t come next time. This happens in many other local governments in the country. All these are on the neck of service providers.
Who bears the cost of excavated infrastructure on roads under construction?
The cost of rebuilding the excavated telecom infrastructure is bowed by the operators whose infrastructure is affected. In some cases we have to pay to the same road contractors to allow us to build trenches on the road edges, because in most cases the design of our roads does not make provision for service infrastructure.
As an engineer, I’m worried that by the time we have to rebuild the last mile on our electrical networks all these roads we are building the power people will come and cut it again. This is likely to happen in the next three years.
Operators and sharing of fibre optic cable
Today, the industry is embracing co-sharing, and we are in full support of co-sharing. Alton has championed the issue of co-sharing, and we are glad that our members are embracing it to very large extent. Presently, we have a number of roads where fibre infrastructure is being co-shared. Our concern is not that one operator will not allow the other to co-share infrastructure, but when you co-share and there is damage to that common infrastructure the impact is more. We agree with the idea of co-sharing, we are supporting it, and encouraging our members to embrace it. After the infrastructure is co-shared, how to collectively protect the co-shared infrastructure that those brought together will not have colossal damage is an important issue.
Congestion and inexperienced technical workers
The issue of operators not using the right manpower might not be correct, what might be correct is the loss of competent manpower to other countries. Most competent manpower, trained hands have left this country because of better attraction in other countries. For instance, take a brilliant Nigerian train him on a switch that is made by a major world manufacturer, send him to best training centres across the world, you bring him back, he works here for two or three years. He becomes a specialist in that equipment, which is common equipment across the world, and he find attraction in another country, he leaves without regard to the training you gave to him. That is an issue that the industry is facing today. If you ask the people why they are leaving they complain about the social problem. One could have a good job with fat salary but the problem of social pressure is making us to loss good hands to developed markets.
The problem is high mobility of people who have being trained that is suppose to be specialist now handling core network elements here and we are losing them on account of failure of our social infrastructure.
When people talk about congestion, they are in different ways. The engineering is not something one can easily explain to one who does not have the background. Today, no network operator is working without the right ‘headroom,’ this is the tolerance you have to coup with when there is upsurge in subscriber demand or capacity demand. Operators work with suitable ‘headroom.’ What happens is that, the demand for services sometimes prove wrong of the entire world known theories on projections for ‘headroom’ and others. There are a number of issues when you come to the point of expansion of the network, for example, if you have enough headroom of about 70% the international standard is that you allow for headroom of about 15% but we allow for 70%. In no distance time it is consumed, and you have to begin a process of expansion, so from commissioning it takes a minimum of six months before it is consumed.
As a player and representative of the operators I’m saying that telecom remains the most functional infrastructure in the country today.

Kindly share this post

Telecom

From Import Dependency to Local Capacity: Nigeria’s Tech Manufacturing Journey

Published

1 day ago

April 7, 2026

Ugo Onwuaso

Kindly share this post

The recent escalation in the US-Israel conflict with Iran has delivered a sharp reminder of Nigeria’s economic vulnerability. As oil prices surged past $100 per barrel and fuel costs climbed by 35% at Nigerian pumps, a troubling paradox emerged: Nigeria, a major crude oil producer with Africa’s largest privately-owned refinery now operational, still found itself buffeted by global energy shocks originating thousands of miles away.

From Import Dependency to Local Capacity: Nigeria's Tech Manufacturing Journey

Zinox

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and resulting disruptions to global energy markets exposed the deeper structural challenge facing Nigeria’s economy. Despite domestic crude production and the operational Dangote Refinery, Nigeria has struggled with rising inflation, which reached approximately 27% in 2025. The crisis illuminated an uncomfortable truth: decades of import dependency have left Nigeria’s economy precariously exposed to external shocks, even in sectors where the country possesses natural advantages.

This vulnerability extends beyond energy. Nigeria’s technology sector offers a particularly instructive case study in the costs of import reliance, and the transformative potential of local capacity as the pathway to economic stability and technological sovereignty.

Against this backdrop, Zinox Technologies stands as a compelling counternarrative. Founded in 2001 by technology entrepreneur Leo Stan Ekeh, Zinox operates West Africa’s only computerized digital assembly plant. As Nigeria’s first indigenous computer manufacturer, Zinox demonstrates what becomes possible when vision, investment, and commitment to local capacity converge.

The company’s reach extends beyond traditional computing. Zinox’s innovation spans renewable energy through iPower and home electronics with iTEC, addressing Nigeria’s chronic power challenges with locally-assembled solar solutions and backup systems designed for Nigerian conditions. This diversification reflects sophisticated understanding: true technological sovereignty requires integrated capabilities.

Zinox’s journey offers a clear case study in how indigenous companies can drive transformation. By focusing on local assembly and manufacturing of computer hardware and digital devices, the company has contributed to building a domestic technology ecosystem that supports government institutions, educational systems, and private enterprises. This approach not only reduces reliance on foreign imports but also creates jobs, transfers knowledge, and strengthens national capacity.

The implications are significant. Every locally assembled device represents a step away from foreign exchange exposure. It also signals a shift in mindset — from consumption to production. In a country where demand for technology continues to rise, especially with the acceleration of digital adoption, the importance of local manufacturing cannot be overstated.

Beyond economics, there is also a strategic dimension. Technology is no longer just a commercial tool; it is a defense tool and a national asset. Countries that control their technology supply chains are better positioned to innovate, secure their data, and compete globally. In this context, companies like Zinox are not merely businesses; they are enablers of national development.

Furthermore, local capacity development has a multiplier effect. It stimulates ancillary industries such as logistics, retail, maintenance, and technical services. It also fosters entrepreneurship, as more Nigerians gain access to affordable and reliable technology tools needed to participate in the digital economy.

Yet, while progress has been made, there is still work to be done. Scaling local manufacturing requires sustained policy support, infrastructure investment, and a deliberate focus on skills development. It also calls for stronger collaboration between the public and private sectors to create an environment where indigenous innovation can thrive.

Encouragingly, the momentum is building. There is a growing recognition that Nigeria must move beyond being a consumer market to becoming a production hub. This shift is not only necessary, it is urgent. Global uncertainties will continue to test economies, and only those with strong internal capabilities will remain resilient.

The current global crisis offers clarity. If the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened or supply chains to imports are fractured, only countries with strong domestic manufacturing capacity will weather the storm. Those dependent on imports suffer disproportionately.

The story of Zinox Technologies underscores what is possible. It shows that with the right mix of vision and execution, Nigeria can chart a new course, one defined by self-reliance, innovation, and sustainable growth. As the country navigates an increasingly complex global landscape, the message is clear: the future belongs to economies that build, not just buy.

Kindly share this post

Telecom

Airtel Becomes World’s Second Largest Telco as Global Customer Base Surpasses 650 Million

Published

2 days ago

April 7, 2026

Chike Onwuegbuchi

Kindly share this post

Bharti Airtel has announced a major milestone in its global operations, crossing 650 million mobile subscribers worldwide, a scale that now positions the company as the second-largest telecommunications operator on the planet by customer base.

Crossing this threshold reflects a network of immense scale, the capacity to reach customers across diverse markets with consistent quality, and the ability to deliver experiences shaped by sustained innovation.

In Nigeria, Airtel has continued to scale infrastructure at a pace unmatched in its recent history. Over the past three years, the company has increased its national site count from just above 13,000 to nearly 17,200 sites, including more than 1,560 added in the last twelve months. This expansion deepens capacity in high-demand corridors and extends high-speed coverage to previously underserved regions.

The latest industry data from the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) underscores the significance of this growth. As of December 2025, Nigeria recorded 145,141 base stations across 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G layers. Of this national infrastructure, Airtel accounts for 46,918 base-station layers, reflecting its substantial contribution to the country’s radio access network and its push to absorb rising data consumption.

Nearly 99 percent of Airtel Nigeria’s sites are now 4G-enabled, positioning the operator as one of the few with a near-ubiquitous high-speed broadband footprint. Thousands of sites have been upgraded for capacity in the past year alone, enabling improved speeds and more stable performance during peak usage.

That expansion underpins Nigeria’s rising internet adoption. According to the latest regulator figures, Nigeria’s internet penetration recently climbed above 50%, with Airtel recording among the largest monthly increases in new internet subscribers, driven by network upgrades across states and rural corridors.

Strategic Connectivity and Redundancy

Airtel is also tackling a critical infrastructure challenge for the Nigerian digital economy: reliance on a single international internet gateway. The company is advancing plans for its second submarine cable internet breakout point at Kwa Ibo in Akwa Ibom State, early in the 2Africa cable system rollout, to provide faster and more resilient national connectivity across regions. This significant investment aligns with global best practices in network diversity and redundancy, ensuring a more stable digital experience for consumers and enterprises alike.

Digital Finance at Scale: SmartCash

Airtel’s digital finance arm, SmartCash, has gained traction in Nigeria’s competitive mobile money ecosystem, now serving over 3 million active users. The platform is supported by an expansive agent network and digital services that lower barriers for everyday financial transactions and savings.

Outstanding Human Touch: Retail Reach

Across Nigeria, Airtel’s retail distribution network stands as one of the sector’s most extensive, with approximately 4,000 exclusive outlets bringing services, support, and products closer to customers in small towns, communities, and high-traffic urban hubs. That footprint drives both access and engagement in a market where localized presence remains a competitive differentiator.

As Nigeria’s digital economy continues to evolve, Airtel is committed to sustained innovation — from expanded fibre backbones and advanced mobile broadband to future-ready services that include satellite-enabled solutions and enterprise-grade digital platforms. These efforts help ensure that connectivity, commerce, and creativity thrive across Nigeria and beyond.

Kindly share this post

Telecom

Compensation for Poor Service Quality is Automatic- NCC

Published

3 days ago

April 6, 2026

Ebere Melum-Nwogbo

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has said that compensation of subscribers for poor service quality, such as persistent network outages or failed calls is automatic.

Compensation for Poor Service Quality is Automatic- NCC

This initiative aims to ensure fairness by mandating that operators provide automatic compensation, such as airtime credits, for failing to meet regulatory Quality of Service Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

According to the NCC, operators are required and mandated to identify affected subscribers and provide compensation directly.

In a framework for compensation of consumers published on its website, NCC said that it has directed Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) to compensate subscribers affected by prolonged or repeated poor quality of service experience within specific Local Government Areas where operators fail to meet regulatory Quality of Service Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

The NCC also stated that the directive does not replace existing consumer protection mechanisms.

The NCC, said the directive adds a direct compensation mechanism for affected subscribers and aligns with measures set in existing legislations such as the Consumer Code of Practice Regulations 2024 and the Quality of Service Regulations 2024.

This directive applies to only Mobile Network Operators licensed and operating in Nigeria that have failed to meet their Key Performance Indicators on Quality of Service. For Internet Service Providers (ISPs) operating in Nigeria, a compensation framework is already in place.

To be eligible to receive compensation

. You experienced poor network service in an affected Local Government Area; and

You made at least one outgoing revenue generating event (billed call, SMS, or data session) during the relevant period.

The compensation covers service failures affecting voice, data, or SMS services.

Operators are required and mandated by existing regulations to monitor their network performance across locations and service disruptions against Quality of Service KPIs.

This enables them to identify affected subscribers without the need for individual complaints.

Only service failures that fall below the defined thresholds set by the Quality of Service Regulations issued by the NCC will qualify for compensation.

Short, isolated interruptions and immediately remedied interruptions may not qualify

Compensation will be provided in the form of airtime credits.

This airtime credit will not have utilisation restrictions, and subscribers will be able to use it for voice calls, USSD sessions, data subscriptions, etc on the operators’ network.

Kindly share this post