E-Financial
The Collapse of FTX

By Oluseyi Akindeinde
FTX recently valued at $32 billion dollars, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US. The filing in Delaware federal court on Friday 11th November, 2022 included the main FTX international exchange, FTX US a US crypto marketplace, Sam Bankman-Fried’s proprietary trading group Alameda Research and about 130 affiliated companies.
In this piece I try to dissect what went wrong at FTX, and discuss possible ramifications for the crypto industry.
The Players
- Sam Bankman-Fried aka SBF (The self proclaimed Crypto White Knight and member of the inner caucus. Darling of Washington DC).
- Caroline Ellison aka CE (His Girlfriend).
- Changpeng Zhao aka CZ (The Outcast Dark Crypto Lord).
The Entities
- Alameda Research (AR). The Trading company founded and OWNED by SBF but managed by CE. Revenue earned through market making (ie providing liquidity to crypto exchanges) as well as trading/speculating on cryptocurrency futures using a high degree of leverage.
– FTX (FTX.com). Cryptocurrency
Futures Exchange (brokerage and derivatives platform) OWNED and CONTROLLED by SBF. Revenue earned through customer transaction fees who trade and speculate on cryptocurrency futures and derivatives(day traders). The trading platform was called FTXPro.
– Binance. A rival crypto Exchange OWNED & CONTROLLED by CZ. The Biggest cryptocurrency spot exchange in the world by volume.
Quick Summary
- AR and FTX were meant to be separate entities even though they were founded by the same person SBF.
– FTX had a market-cap (networth) of $32 billion having raised funding from well known
VCs in Silicon Valley including Sequoia Capital.
- AR allegedly owed FTX $8 billion after taking loans apparently funded by deposits of FTX customers.
- AR used these borrowed funds to trade cryptocurrencies with leverage and also to bail out struggling crypto companies (Voyager and BlockFI) who had liquidity issues.
– FTX declared bankruptcy with loads of customer funds gone with it.
How Money Disappeared – Summary
– SBF founded AR and FTX.
– FTX also issued FTT tokens which they gave to early investors that included AR.
– As an exchange, customers deposited their funds on FTX to trade with.
– SBF basically gave these customer deposits to AR as loans to be used for their trading activities and in return accepted FTT tokens (originally issued by FTX) as collateral for the loan.
– A report then came out that pointed out that AR’s balance sheet was basically made up largely of FTT tokens issued by FTX.
– CZ (who once bought a stake in FTX but later divested because he had a bone to pick with SBF) upon getting wind of this development announced he would de-risk his entire $500M of FTT position.
- On the back of this, other customers also started to dump their FTT tokens and immediately started withdrawing their funds on FTX. It led to a bank run.
- AR then started selling assets presumably on other exchanges to send back to FTX to shore up capital in order to meet the customer shortfall.
- When SBF realized the liquidity squeeze, he then reached out to CZ for a bail out of FTX wherein CZ accepted the offer of bail out subject to corporate due diligence.
- CZ later pulled out of the deal because his due diligence on FTX had come up short.
- FTT price tanked as FTX had no liquidity in reserve to meet customer withdrawal obligations and subsequently paused withdrawals.
– From being illiquid, FTX became insolvent since the value of the collateral held (FTT) had fallen below the value of their liabilities.
- SBF basically thought he could print money (FTT) out of thin-air using FTX as the mechanism and use it as collateral against real assets.
- FTX, AR and SBF filed for bankruptcy protection post- haste.
How Money Disappeared – Details
Background
- SBF, an MIT physics graduate and a former Wall Street futures trader made a lot of money trading crypto arbitrage. He founded AR but gave CE the reins of power when he founded FTX a crypto futures and derivates trading company.
- FTX as part of its operations issued a token called FTT. It is like airline miles or reward points as you don’t get any ownership stake in FTX itself.
- FTT token allowed the holder to obtain discounts on trading fees when they trade on FTXPro. It could also be pledged as collateral for futures trading on FTXPro.
- FTX used a portion of profits (trading fees) generated to buy back and burn a portion of FTT in circulation.
- So indirectly FTT token was tied to the profitability of FTX – that is the more profitable FTX was, the more FTT tokens FTX would buy back leading to an increase in the price of the FTT tokens (the reverse was also the case if FTX wasn’t profitable).
– Burning FTT would also lead to reducing its supply which further increases its price. This also made FTT behave somewhat like a company stock. But it wasn’t legally a stock.
– There were over 400,000 holders of FTT at the last count.
– Word got out about AR’s balance sheet which had $14.6 billion but it’s biggest asset was
$3.7bn worth of “unlocked FTT” and its other biggest asset was
$2.2bn worth of FTT that were pledged as collateral. Basically nearly half of AR’s balance sheet was made up of FTT tokens – an asset created by FTX.
- AR’s balance sheet liability also carried $7.4bn worth of liabilities (loans).
- From purely a risk management point of view, this was rather bad because AR was using it’s own equity as collateral for borrowed money. If the company became unprofitable, this would be bad in itself but if the collateral (FTT tokens) backing those loans were to fall in value, this would become a disaster for AR.
Relationship Between FTX and AR
- SBF founded both companies. FTX being the exchange. AR was the trading company using FTX to conduct its trading activities.
- FTX and AR claimed they were completely separate entities. Speculation however started to spread on social media that the two companies were one and the same and customer funds on FTX were finding their way to AR behind the scenes.
– It was later gathered that FTT token’s price was being propped up by AR. Not only that, AR was further using FTT it got issued by FTX as collateral to the same FTX to fund its own operations.
– It was bad enough that AR carried a lot of illiquid assets on their books (FTT), it became even worse when FTX started giving a huge portion of their customer funds to AR as loans which were collateralised and secured by the very same FTT tokens issued by FTX.
– Remember that FTX issued FTT tokens in the first place. So, they were getting back what they issued as collateral. Like plugging an extension plug into itself. Simply means if the price of FTT went down, FTX would be seriously impacted.
Crisis Brewing
- FTX’s primarily business was being a broker dealer. They were listing and selling
perpetual crypto futures and allowing AR and other traders/ speculators to trade crypto derivatives often with huge leverage.
- As a result, they needed a reserve of money to lend to AR and speculators.
- And because FTX and AR were one and the same, customer funds deposited on FTX were diverted to AR for leveraged trading operations.
- Once suspicion started to filter
through that FTX didn’t have enough crypto on hand to honour all customer withdrawals, customers started demanding for their funds and FTX started having liquidity issues as there wasn’t enough reserve on hand to meet up with customer’s withdrawals.
- AR in turn started withdrawing funds (stable coins and crypto)
they had on other exchanges to send to FTX. This served to further confirm that FTX was really facing a liquidity crisis.
Denials
- SBF denied the liquidity crisis and basically said everything was fine and customer funds were intact. He even claimed it was all the work of competitors trying to spook them.
- At the same time CE (who ran AR) took to twitter to say that AR had $10bn in liquidity not reported on the balance sheet.
Enter CZ
- CZ who was a former investor in FTX had over $500M worth of FTT. It was paid in part as
settlement when CZ divested from FTX in 2021.
- Actually SBF bought back CZ’s stake in FTX and paid him $2.1bn in BUSD and FTT tokens.
- When CZ got wind of the report of AR’s balance sheet and its asset makeup, he made a public declaration to offload his entire $500M worth of FTT in what he called a “de-risking” process.
- This piece of public declaration naturally spooked the markets as speculators who held FTT tokens started de-risking (selling) as well.
The Death Spiral
- With speculators selling, FTT price began to plummet.
- It was made worse when CE incredibly made a public offer to CZ that AR were willing to buy Binance’s entire FTT stake at $22 each over-the-counter.
- This further fuelled the fire that AR and FTX were using FTT as collateral for crypto loans and feared getting liquidated.
- This caused hundreds of millions of dollars in FTT liquidations on FTX and because
of low liquidity it further crashed the price. AR and FTX also started selling off the other crypto assets they held to prevent FTX from collapsing.
This caused other cryptocurrency prices to tank. A ripple effect.
- Traders also started rushing to pull their funds off FTX exchange for fear that the exchange would collapse. This essentially led to a bank run.
The Aborted Rescue Mission
- People just couldn’t believe that FTX, a company that had raised a combined $1.8bn in VC money could be facing insolvency.
- The unthinkable then happened – SBF publicly reached out to CZ and asked to be bailed out.
- CZ accepted by signing a non- binding letter of intent (LoI) to buy FTX pending due diligence.
This served to further confirm that FTX was indeed neck deep in trouble.
- The following day, however, CZ through Binance made it known that they wouldn’t be taking up the offer of buying FTX as the issues were simply too many.
FTX had failed their process of corporate due diligence.
Binance also cited risks related to pending regulatory investigations on FTX and reports of internal FTX funds mismanagement.
- FTX then paused withdrawals of customer funds. There was already an $8bn shortfall.
- SBF attempted a last ditch effort at raising funds but no offer of a bail-out was forthcoming.
Bankruptcy Filing
- FTX and AR are now insolvent and SBF has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
- They imploded in a wave of scuttlebutt and were brought down in truly exceptional circumstances.
- The fallout of this is still unravelling and will most likely take a few months to sort out. Until then there will still be blood on the crypto streets so tread with caution. Brace yourselves for more bloodbath.
- A lot of people lost loads of money on FTX. Here’s a Never leave your funds on an Exchange. Get a non-custodial wallet and move your funds there. Exchanges are centralized entities.
Wrap up
Naturally people will be more skeptical of crypto but this, in fact isn’t crypto problem.
This was caused by a few self- absorbed, irresponsible and incompetent individuals like SBF and CE running centralised entities engaging in blackbox-like business practices, mis-using customer funds to run opaque financial institutions under a cloak of invincibility with no oversight regulation.
These guys basically ran a huge fraudulent operation which could have gone undetected for a long time.
The system needs sanitization. Some regulation needs to be enforced to bring a semblance of order to the industry.
A lot of Nigerians lost money in this debacle and I truly sympathize with you if you did. These are truly extraordinary times.
At the end of the day nothing is wrong with crypto. It’s just a medium and a tool in the hands of nefarious individuals. Going forward though, always remember: Not your keys. Not your coins.
I round off with these words from CZ
Oluseyi Akindeinde is the Chief Technology Officer, Digital Encode.
E-Financial
SEC Alerts Public on Silverkuun, Trending Dubious Investment Schemes

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has warned the public against investing in unregistered investment schemes, including Silverkuun Investment Cooperative Society/Silverkuun Limited.
In a circular issued in Abuja, yesterday, the commission said its attention had been drawn to the activities of these entities, which falsely present themselves as investment advisers and fund managers in the Nigerian capital market.
“The attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission has been drawn to the activities of Silverkuun Investment Cooperative Society/Silverkuun Limited which holds itself out as an Investment Adviser/Fund Manager.
“The Commission hereby informs the public that Silverkuun Investment Cooperative Society/Silverkuun Limited is not registered to operate in any capacity in the Nigerian Capital Market.”
SEC advised the public to refrain from engaging with Silverkuun Investment Cooperative Society/Silverkuun Limited or its representatives in respect of any business in the Nigerian capital market.
“The Commission uses this medium to reiterate that transacting in the Nigerian Capital Market with unregistered and unregulated entities exposes investors to financial risk including fraud and potential loss of investment.
“The investing public is therefore reminded to verify the status of companies and entities offering investment opportunities on the Commission’s portal before transacting with them,” the SEC added.
Dr. Emomotimi Agama, director-general of the SEC, recently warned that the Commission would not hesitate to shut down the operations of such unregistered entities while also ensuring that the promoters are made to face the full weight of the law.
Agama said, “we will shut down their operations and the promoters will be made to face the full weight of the law.
“In a major reform, ISA 2025 officially brings digital assets under the SEC’s regulatory purview, defining them as securities and mandating registration for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and digital asset exchanges. This development aims to close the regulatory vacuum that has allowed many Ponzi-style platforms to thrive under the guise of cryptocurrency and digital finance.”
Agama also emphasized the Commission’s education-focused strategy to combat fraud through podcasts, digital campaigns, and the introduction of capital market literacy in schools and universities, the SEC aims to equip Nigerians with the knowledge to detect and avoid dubious investments.
E-Financial
Africa Cross-border Payments Set to Hit $1 trillion by 2035

Africa’s cross-border payments market is on track to hit $1 trillion by 2035, according to a new report by venture capital firm Oui Capital. Titled “Africa’s Cross-Border Payment Landscape—a deep dive into the systems, players, and shifts shaping Africa’s cross-border payment flows,” the report states that the market is currently valued at $329 billion and growing at a compound annual growth rate of 12%.
It identifies Africa’s booming digital adoption, increasing intra-African trade, and a surge in mobile money usage as the key growth drivers.
Despite the impressive growth, the report highlights systemic inefficiencies.
“Legacy rails, double currency conversions, and fragmented regulations still siphon billions in hidden costs,” Oui Capital states, noting that the continent continues to have the highest global remittance costs, averaging 7–8%.
However, digital innovation is helping reshape the landscape. Mobile money is now a key channel, with 30% of Sub-Saharan remittances flowing through mobile wallets.
In 2022, Africa accounted for 66% of global mobile money transaction value, demonstrating the rapid formalisation of what was once a predominantly informal cash ecosystem.
Oui Capital sees significant investment potential in addressing these inefficiencies. “Infrastructure plays—interoperable API layers, decentralised FX liquidity pools, and PAPSS integrations—represent $10 billion-plus opportunities,” the report says.
The Pan-African Payment and Settlement System is one such initiative pushing for local currency settlements and reduced reliance on USD/EUR clearing, which presently adds around $5 billion in annual costs.
According to the report, cryptocurrencies and Stablecoins are emerging as promising alternatives, cutting remittance costs by up to 60% in markets with clear regulations.
“Fintech APIs are already pushing fees as low as 1.5–3%,” the report notes.
Still, the venture capital firm warns that challenges persist as only 55% of African jurisdictions allow full electronic KYC, limiting the scalability of fintech solutions.
The report urges founders to go beyond peer-to-peer transfers by embedding services like lending and insurance.
“Africa’s payments race is now a scale game. Those that solve for liquidity, compliance and cost will define the continent’s digital trade backbone over the next decade,” it concludes.
E-Financial
SANEF, CIBN Partner to Expand Agency Banking Certification

Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria has expanded its Agency Banking Certification Programme through a tripartite collaboration between the Institute, FIC, and SANEF Limited.
This partnership according Prof. Pius Deji Olanrewaju, President/Chairman of Council the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria, CIBN, is timely and strategic, “as we aim to broaden the reach of the certification across Nigeria’s agent banking sector. With SANEF’s deep integration in the financial inclusion ecosystem and established relationships with leading super agents, we are confident that this collaboration will strengthen the quality and visibility of the programme.
“The goal is clear, to enhance professionalism among agent bankers, support the national financial inclusion strategy, and contribute to building trust and integrity within this growing segment of the financial services sector. This collaboration presents an excellent opportunity for further implementation of the competency framework for the banking industry in Nigeria”.
He noted that the collaboration among others is part of his LEGACY agenda which highlights the multifaceted role of financial institutions in shaping Nigeria’s economic future.
The letter C in the LEGACY agenda refers to Competence in the banking and Finance industry, which is a very crucial factor in the banking and finance sector. Competent individuals in this industry are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage financial resources. Individuals with expertise in this field can contribute to the growth and stability of the economy.
Mrs. Uche Uzoebo, Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Shared Agency Network Expansion Facilities, SANEF, described the memorandum of Understanding, MoU, as a visionary partnership that seeks to expand Financial Inclusion through Agent banking training, Financial Literacy and knowledge impartation, an objective that forms a key pivot of what SANEF represents.
“Over the years, SANEF, in strong collaboration with our key stakeholders, Banks and Licenced Super-Agents/Mobile Money Operators and other Financial Service Providers, have continued to deepen the frontiers of Financial Inclusion and agent bank. Financial Literacy and training have remained a key part of this objective.
“This MOU ceremony is a fulfillment of a shared vision through the expansion of Agent Banking, Financial Literacy, capacity building, thought leadership, training and competency.
She further explained that the agreement provides a training structure with well-curated and knowledge filled training modules and materials that will deepen the knowledge and capacity in agent banking.
“It will go ahead to deepen and expand the knowledge and capacity of all participants that will take part in this training and we believe that with the quality and cooperation of all parties present, this very important objective of impartation of knowledge and thought leadership, grooming and training minds to be empowered and learned and contributing our quota to nation building and be a better place,” she added.
- Telecom2 days ago
Glo, Huawei, Communications Ministry Bring Digital Services to Abuja Village
- E-Financial2 days ago
SEC Alerts Public on Silverkuun, Trending Dubious Investment Schemes
- General News2 days ago
Tripoint Travels Hosts Pre-GEC Brunch for Nigerian Delegates Ahead of Global Entrepreneurship Congress 2025
- E-Financial2 days ago
Africa Cross-border Payments Set to Hit $1 trillion by 2035
- News2 days ago
PalmPay Launches CSR Initiatives to Empower Women, Foster Financial Literacy in Northern Nigeria
- Telecom2 days ago
Experts @ ABoICT 2025 Warn of Digital Disaster Risks in Nigeria Without AI Governance
- E-Financial2 days ago
SANEF, CIBN Partner to Expand Agency Banking Certification
- Broadcasting2 days ago
DStv Makes History: Inducted into Brand Africa Hall of Fame as Africa’s Most Admired Media Brand