Connect with us

News

The Law and the Use of Computers in Nigeria (1)

Published

on

Kindly share this post

People are currently serving jail terms in the UK and the US because they infiltrated other people’s computers that they weren’t told to. Similarly in Nigeria, some people’s liberty is currently being restricted because they use the computer to make   phony deals online. In Microsoft vs.  Alexander Pononsov, a  Russian court passed a  verdict  of  guilty  on a rural  school teacher  that  unknowingly  used  pirated Microsoft operating  systems.   The common denominator in the above scenarios is that the law took over, reduced all the computing technicalities into the desiccated vernacular of its trade and made prosecutions. But how effective and comprehensive are computers laws in Nigeria and  the  developing  world  at large as   compared to the advance countries. Remember we are all players in the same cyberspace, and hence faces the same threats.
The computer law in Nigeria is  way  underdeveloped and  hence  do not  meet  with the  contemporary  requirements of  the modern  information  and  technology age. We  lack  the  technical  resources,  expertise as  well as the  legal  framework to  tackle  cyber crimes  and  computer  crimes at  large. The  business environment  in  any country  is  greatly  strengthened by  the  security environment: therefore, serious  Techno-legal  ICT  training is required  for  judges, lawyers, law students, law  professors and corporate  executives in  Nigeria. A wise litigator now  in  Nigeria will be  looking  forth  to  writing  his MCP- Microsoft  Certified Professional which will  be  a stepping  stone  to  acquiring Techno-Legal  trainings. An MCP  attached  to  his   name  a  lone is an  intimidation  to  other litigator.
Now that the infrastructures in any country can no longer function without computers and networks, a well regulated computing industry instills a lot of confidence in computer related transactions and help guard against IT risk complexities. When the internet was  first introduced , it was  like a state of nature where internet browsers have unlimited freedom but gradually laws came up that limited what people can and cannot do on the computer. I often participate in a hackers forum on a website floated from Germany, today legislative laws  came up in Germany that  prohibited that site from being floated from Germany.
Computer law is mostly an eclectic amalgamation of concepts from existing law, which are applied to the relatively new technologies of computer hardware and software, e-mail, and the Internet. (Google tech Dictionary). However, there are several reasons why it is convenient to have a separate classification for computer law:
1. Solving legal problems that arose from the use of computers often requires some legal principles that are rarely encountered in the practice of law. For example:
A. Disputes about e-mail and web pages on the Internet extend across state lines, and may even extend across national borders. For example, there are technical issues in personal jurisdiction and which state’s law should be applied to the resolution of the dispute. To solve these legal problems, one must understand principles of an abstruse area of law, called Conflicts of Law. Instead of relatively firm rules with predictable results, as in most other areas of law, conflicts analysis can be characterized as choosing from a menu of possibilities.
B. Information stored on computers (e.g., software, data, trade secrets, confidential personal information) is generally much more valuable than the computer hardware. In order to protect this information, many of the concepts in the practice of computer law involve the specialized area of Intellectual Property Law, which includes copyrights, trademarks, and patents. Take the US for instance, in order to practice before the U.S. Patent Office; an attorney must have at least a bachelor’s degree in some area of science or engineering, a requirement that excludes nearly all attorneys.

2. Traditional concepts in law are being expanded by events in the area of computer law. For example:
A. Computer software is legally considered a "good". Unlike other goods, the "purchaser" only owns the floppy diskette or compact disk that contains the software, plus a license to use the software. The Uniform Commercial Code was amended by including Article 2B in the US patent  law to cover licensing of computer software.
B. Computer databases that contain erroneous information (e.g., false credit reports) can be harmful to people, which may give rise to a new class of torts, called infotorts
C. Hackers who use a modem to enter a computer without authorization and either (1) use its services or (2) alter records are committing a crime similar to burglary, but the traditional notion of burglary requires the criminal personally to enter the victim’s premises, which is not satisfied in the case of entry via data to/from a modem. Therefore, new laws were enacted to define computer crimes (Personally, I think it would have been preferable to change the definitions in existing concepts, instead of create new concepts, but no one would accuse the legal profession of honoring simplicity and economy.)
D. Authentication of evidence contained in files on a computer presents some new problems, because of the ease with which data in the file can be altered, and also because it is easy to alter the operating system’s date and time stamp in the directory.
E. Searches of computer databases provide access to information that was difficult to locate in the pre-computer age, which makes computer databases a major new threat to privacy of individuals.
The Internet has been revolutionary in giving anyone with a website the equivalent of a printing press or television transmitter: now anyone can broadcast their information or opinion to the whole world, without first going through formal review by a publisher. Many governments have reacted to the Internet with new censorship of both websites and readers’ access to the Internet. Furthermore, there has been widespread copyright infringement by people who post material at their website that was copied from other websites, or copied from books, without written permission of the copyright owner.

Law reacts slowly to new technology, With the exception of the telephone and typewriter, the technological revolution of the past century has left the law untouched. Law has dealt at arm’s length with technology, making new rules to cover air travel, genetic engineering, and the like, while the lawyers who do the work carry on with paper and pencil – until the advent of the computer.
The case in the developing world  need a deep focus, perhaps I might be wrong , maybe  a  deeper focus. Judging computer related crimes need  players with  adequate computer knowledge on  the technical  side. In Nigeria, law enforcement agent have little or no computer education  to combat  rising computer related crimes. We need a separate court for trials regarding computer related crimes and judges that are conversant with  bits  and  bytes, like  the juvenile court system in which lots  of  proceedings in the normal court  system doesn’t  apply  there. Surprisingly, the issue of laws  regarding computer crimes have not had adequate attention even in developed world. This is as a result  of  different interpretation of what  constitutes  a  computer  device and computer crimes at  large. For instance the newly elected state law in West Virginia  regarding computer crimes  states that :
Any person who, knowingly and willfully, directly or indirectly accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer services r computer network for the purpose of (1) executing any scheme or artifice o defraud or (2) obtaining money, property or services by means of fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises shall be guilty of a felony, and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned in the penitentiary for not more than ten years or both.
In the Alabama Computer Crime Act, the same issue has a different punishment and interpretation. Also, issues’ regarding definitions as regards to what is a data, computer network, computer programs etc have been interpreted in different ways under different State Laws in the US. This variance stress from Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated,, the State of Wisconsin Statutes, Washington Criminal Code in the revised code of Washington Annotated, and the Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated under Organized Crime and Fraud and so on.
Computer users and law enforcement agents in Nigeria need serious awareness by concerned agencies as regards to what constitute a computer crime locally and  in the cyberworld. Initially,  I  stressed on  the technical abilities  of all players involved in pinning  a computer crime, this  is  because  technical issues  are paramount  in both the investigation and prosecution  phase of  the crime . I was in a  cybercafé in Ikeja, then EFCC officials  stormed into  the café and instructed  every body  to pause, they  then  move  round to check  what  people are doing. I laughed because this is highly  unskillful and untechnical way of tackling a computer incident on the side of the law enforcement agents. People like us whether you shutdown your PC , we  can still backtrack what you were  doing . If you like unplug the power cord so that the system suddenly dies off I can still trace back your  activities  on the system. In fact format your hard drive I can still retrieve data from it.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

News

Kaspersky, AFRIPOL Conduct Joint Cybersecurity Training for African law Enforcement

Published

on

Kindly share this post

As part of a joint initiative with AFRIPOL, Kaspersky provided cybersecurity training courses for law enforcement representatives from 23 African countries, unfolding the fundamentals of Security Operations Center (SOC) activities and advanced threat hunting techniques.

As cyberthreats continue to grow in scale and complexity, strengthening the technical capabilities of law enforcement agencies has become an important priority worldwide. Through knowledge-sharing programmes, technology companies can contribute practical expertise gained from real-world cyber investigations and threat analysis.

Such collaboration helps equip law enforcement professionals with the skills and tools needed to investigate digital crimes more effectively and strengthen cybersecurity capabilities.

From November 2025 to March 2026, around 40 African officers from 23 countries* received “Security Operations and Threat Hunting” training, provided as part of the cooperation agreement between Kaspersky and AFRIPOL signed in 2024. During the training, African officers gained practical knowledge of Security Operations Center (SOC) activities and modern cyber-defence practices.

The programme covered key aspects of threat detection and incident investigation, including how to identify malicious activity in Windows and Linux environments, analyse attacker tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) and use threat intelligence to uncover advanced threats.

As part of the training, a series of online Q&A sessions were organised, providing participants with the opportunity to engage directly with experts and course authors from Kaspersky’s Security Services team. These sessions allowed attendees to clarify complex topics, discuss practical cases and receive additional insights, reinforcing the learning experience and ensuring a deeper understanding of key cybersecurity concepts.

“Cybercrime today is highly sophisticated, borderless and constantly evolving, which means no single organisation can tackle it alone. This is why cooperation and knowledge sharing between the private cybersecurity sector and law enforcement agencies are so critical. Our long-standing collaboration with AFRIPOL demonstrates the value of this approach.

“Over the years, Kaspersky and AFRIPOL have worked together to better understand the cyberthreat landscape across Africa and to support international efforts aimed at disrupting cybercrime. By continuing to invest in training and capacity building, we aim to support law enforcement professionals with the expertise they need to investigate digital crimes effectively and contribute to building a safer and more trusted digital environment for everyone,” says Yuliya Shlychkova, Vice President, Public Affairs, at Kaspersky.

“Strengthening the capabilities of law enforcement agencies is essential to effectively address the growing complexity of cybercrime across the African continent. Initiatives such as this training programme play an important role in equipping officers with the practical skills needed to investigate cyber incidents, analyse digital evidence and respond to emerging threats.

“Cooperation with partners from the private cybersecurity sector, such as Kaspersky, helps law enforcement agencies stay informed about the latest threat trends and investigative approaches.

“We highly value this collaboration and the opportunity it creates to further develop the cybercrime response capabilities of AFRIPOL member countries,” says Dr Mohammed Benaired, Head, Training and Capacity Building Division at AFRIPOL.

In 2024, to further enhance global efforts to combat cyber offenses, Kaspersky and AFRIPOL signed a cooperation agreement in preventing and fighting cybercrime.

Covering a period of five years, the document formalises and facilitates cooperation between the company and the law enforcement agency in sharing threat intelligence data on the latest cybercriminal activities and entails the provision of assistance and know-how in information security analysis.

Kaspersky Expert Training is used by numerous organisations and academic institutions to advance their skills in battling against cybercrime. Since the inception of this online training programme, Kaspersky experts have trained more than 3,000 specialists from 50 countries around the world.

Providing their expertise with 12 educational courses, they share their insights on advanced tactics and strategies in Reverse Engineering, Threat Hunting, Incident Response and more – each divided by the level of students’ experience.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Nigeria Spends $470m on AI-powered Surveillance Devices- Report

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria has emerged as the largest investor in artificial intelligence-driven surveillance systems on the continent, committing over $470 million to advanced monitoring technologies, according to a new report.

Nigeria Spends $470m on AI-powered Surveillance Devices- Report

Pic credit…bokysee.com

The study found that Nigeria, alongside 10 other African countries, has collectively spent no less than $2.1 billion on AI-powered surveillance infrastructure.

AI-powered surveillance devices represent a significant shift from passive recording to active, real-time monitoring and threat detection

The study, described as the most comprehensive account of smart city surveillance in Africa, examined deployments in Algeria, Egypt, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

These investments include facial recognition systems and automatic number plate recognition tools aimed at strengthening security and urban monitoring.

The report, titled “Smart City Surveillance in Africa: Mapping Chinese AI Surveillance Across 11 Countries,” was produced by the Institute of Development Studies and released in March 2026.

It highlights Nigeria’s position at the forefront of adopting smart surveillance technologies, reflecting a broader trend across Africa where governments are increasingly turning to AI solutions to address security challenges and improve urban management.

“This level of expenditure translates into an average spend in the region of $240m per country.

“Nigeria alone has documented public expenditure of $470m AI-enabled facial recognition and ANPR, making it the continent’s largest buyer of smart city surveillance technologies,” the report stated.

“In all cases, we know that the real total is significantly higher because surveillance spending is often secret; no figures were available for two of the 11 countries studied; the public accounts for the other nine countries were incomplete; and this study included only 11 of Africa’s 55 countries,” the researchers noted.

The report said most of the surveillance infrastructure deployed across the countries was supplied by Chinese firms and financed through soft loans from Chinese banks.

“The Chinese safe city surveillance package is typically financed by soft loans from Chinese banks.

“A typical package involves a loan of $250m from Eximbank tied to the purchase of surveillance cameras from Hikvision and a command and control centre built and serviced by Huawei or ZTE,” it said.

The report explained that the packages usually include thousands of smart closed-circuit television cameras capable of transmitting geo-located facial recognition and vehicle number plate data in real time.

“The Chinese safe city package typically includes installing thousands of smart CCTV surveillance cameras, which transmit geo-located facial recognition and car number plate data in real time for analysis using artificial intelligence at dedicated data centres that serve as command and control facilities for police and security operatives,” the report added.

The study further revealed that China supplied smart city surveillance technologies to all 11 countries reviewed, while South Korea and Russia supplied three countries each, and the United Arab Emirates supplied two.

It added that the actual spending across the region could be significantly higher due to secrecy around surveillance budgets and incomplete public financial records.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Metaverse Collapses, Horizon Worlds Shuts Down on Quest

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The metaverse, championed by Meta (formerly Facebook) in 2021, has largely collapsed due to low user adoption, technical limitations, and massive financial losses exceeding $80 billion.

Metaverse Collapses, Horizon Worlds Shuts Down on Quest

Mark Zuckerberg

Meta is shutting down its flagship VR platform, Horizon Worlds, in June 2026, marking a major shift toward AI and mobile-first strategies.

The app will be removed from the Quest store on March 31 and discontinued in VR by June 15, continuing only as a mobile service.

Horizon Worlds, launched in 2021, was central to Meta’s rebranding from Facebook and its vision of a fully immersive virtual environment.

Despite billions in investment and high-profile partnerships, the platform failed to attract a large user base and struggled with design limitations and weak engagement.

Reality Labs, the division behind the metaverse push, has accumulated nearly$80 billion in losses since 2020, including more than$6 billion in a single quarter.

Recent layoffs affecting around 10 percent of the VR workforce, along with the shutdown of related projects, underscore a broader pullback.

Competition and shifting priorities have accelerated the decline.

Rival platforms such as VRChat maintained stronger communities, while Meta increasingly redirected resources toward AI and hardware, including its Ray-Ban smart glasses.

Although Meta says it remains committed to VR, the closure of Horizon Worlds signals a strategic reset.

The company is repositioning its future around AI-driven products, marking a decisive shift away from its earlier metaverse vision.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending