Connect with us

E-Financial

Williams, Nigerian gets US Court Nod to Seize $21m from FG’s Account with JP Morgan

Published

on

Kindly share this post

United States District Court Southern District of New York, has given one Louis Emovbira Williams, a Nigerian businessman, the authorisation to withdraw $21 million from Nigeria’s bank account with JP Morgan, used to stash funds from crude oil sales to foreign entities.

Williams, Nigerian gets US Court Nod to Seize $21m from FG’s Account with JP Morgan

Bola Tinubu

Justice Liman Lewis, in August, denied Nigeria’s motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Mr Williams, who was scammed by the Nigerian government over a food importation business deal that cost him millions of dollars in 1986.

People’s Gazette reported that not only was Mr Williams swindled of $6.5 million by the Nigerian government, he said he was also tortured by the SSS and tried for “economic sabotage” after he returned to Nigeria from the UK to retrieve the funds. He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment in 1986 but left prison in 1989, having languished in jail for three years.

He got a presidential pardon from Ibrahim Babangida, then military head of statein August 1993 and a “Fidelity Guarantee and Abiding Memorandum of Understanding of Assurance” for him to be paid approximately $6.5 million at 17 per cent compound interest on a rollover basis since 1986 and N5 million including a 25 per cent compound interest.

However, the payment didn’t come. CBN’s unwillingness to pay the lump sum left the matter unresolved for decades until Nigeria returned to civilian rule and prompted Mr Williams to file a suit at the UK court, where the West African nation was ordered to refund the businessman with compensation.

In 2018, Justice Mary Clare Moulder of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice in UK okayed the seizure of $21,231,960.74 and £19,763.130 from the Central Bank of Nigeria’s account domiciled in JP Morgan.

The defendants include the federal government, the attorney general of the federation, CBN, JP Morgan & Co. and other parties who have yet to be named in the suit.

Having obtained a court order authorising him to seize millions of dollars from Nigeria’s account with JP Morgan, the businessman argued his entitlement to the funds before the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

But CBN requested that the suit be transferred from the Supreme Court to a lower court where Nigeria can plead sovereignty.

There, Nigeria argued it had sovereign immunity, which made it impervious to the UK court order in that a sovereign state cannot subject itself to the orders of other nations.

But Mr Liman of the U.S. District Court of New York court dismissed Nigeria’s argument and held that the West African nation had already waived its sovereign immunity per the terms of the Fidelity Guarantee issued to Mr Williams in 1993.

“Therefore for the avoidance of doubt, both the Nigerian State and CBN must be deemed to have waived any immunity from levying of execution on amount kept in the name of CBN or State of Nigeria or any institution of Nigeria (save diplomatic) to the extent to which any amount in [paragraph] (14) above remains unpaid,” stated the 1993 Fidelity Guarantee that the Nigerian government issued to Mr Williams.

“Neither the Nigerian State nor the CBN shall raise or invoke any defences so as to deprive Dr Williams of his monies in [paragraph] (14) above or make it financially onerous and burdensome such as requiring Dr Williams to suffer,” the Guarantee added.

Mr Liman determined that Nigeria could not turn around to contend for sovereign immunity, which had already been waived in the Guarantee.

“Accordingly, the Fidelity Guarantee reflects a waiver of sovereign immunity for any proceeding in any court to recognise and enforce a judgement pertaining to Plaintiff’s seized funds,” the U.S. judge stated on August 12.

But the Nigerian government, reluctant to part with its cash asset, already sought to appeal the ruling at the Second Circuit in New York as records have been transmitted to the appellate court where the arguments will again be re-examined and redetermined.

Nigeria has already lost on a similar ground from another court of appeals in the U.S., the one in the District of Columbia in Washington D.C., which ruled in favour of Zhongshan Chinese investors to seize Nigerian assets abroad over a botched free trade zone deal.

The appellate decision in the Chinese case in the District of Columbia Circuit is not binding on the courts under the Second Circuit, where New York falls.

The case adds to the mounting list of litigations that sully Nigeria’s reputation among its international counterparts as courts in France, UK and Canada have similarly given orders greenlighting the confiscation of Nigerian assets abroad.

Mr Williams said the funds, when recovered, would be used to improve children’s health and education in Nigeria.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

E-Financial

CBN Sets October 31 Deadline for Payment Companies to Comply with ISO 20022

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has issued a fresh directive mandating all participants in the country’s payment ecosystem to complete migration to the ISO 20022 messaging standard and implement mandatory geo-tagging of payment terminals by October 31, 2025.

In a circular published on its official website on Tuesday, the apex bank reminded Deposit Money Banks (DMBs), Microfinance Banks (MFBs), Mobile Money Operators (MMOs), Switching and Processing Companies, Payment Terminal Service Providers (PTSPs), Payment Solution Service Providers (PSSPs), Super Agents, and other licensed operators that ISO 20022 is now the global benchmark for payments messaging.

The circular was signed by Dr Rakiya O. Yusuf, Director of the Payments System Supervision Department at the CBN and dated August 25, 2025.

According to the document, the move aligns with SWIFT’s global migration timeline and is intended to standardise quality data across Nigeria’s financial system.

“All payment transaction messages exchanged domestically or internationally must be formatted in ISO 20022 in line with CBN and SWIFT specifications,” the circular noted.

Institutions are also required to ensure accurate population of mandatory data elements, including payer and payee identifiers, merchant and agent identifiers, and transaction metadata.

The CBN stressed that compliance with these requirements is not optional, warning that all in-scope institutions must complete migration activities and achieve full compliance before the October 31 deadline.

Beyond messaging standards, the circular also introduces mandatory geo-tagging of payment terminals to enhance oversight and curb fraud in the electronic payments space.

All existing and newly deployed payment terminals are required to have native geolocation services enabled, supported by double-frequency GPS receivers. Terminals must also be registered with a Payment Terminal Service Aggregator (PTSA) with precise latitude and longitude coordinates tied to merchant business locations.

Also, the CBN mandated that Android OS version 10 is now the minimum software requirement for all terminals to ensure compatibility with the National Central Switch’s geolocation monitoring system.

Terminals not directly routed through a PTSA will not be permitted to transact, while geo-location data is to be captured at the point of transaction and included in the message payload as a mandatory reporting field.

“All existing terminals must be geo-tagged within 60 days of this circular; new terminals going forward must be geo-tagged before certification and activation,” the CBN stated.

Also, the regulator announced that compliance validation exercises will commence from October 20, 2025.

The circular emphasised that these reforms are aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s payments infrastructure, boosting transparency, and aligning with international best practices.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

NIIRA 2025, New Law Offers N2m Medical Compensation for Uninsured Accident Victims

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA) 2025, the new insurance law, has provided up to N2 million in medical compensation for  victims of road accidents involving uninsured vehicles.

NIIRA 2025, New Law Offers N2m Medical Compensation for Uninsured Accident Victims

This law aims to ensure that accident victims are not left without financial support for their medical treatment simply because the at-fault vehicle was uninsured.

It provides a safety net to protect innocent victims and ease their burden during recovery.

According to NIIRA 2025, any person involved in a motor accident caused by an uninsured vehicle or unidentified driver will henceforth be entitled to hospital expenses that shall not exceed N2 million.

Section 99 of the Act stated that the amount may be reviewed by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM).

It said a fund known as the Road Accident Victims Compensation Fund was established, and insurers are to pay 0.5 per cent of the underwriting profit on motor business to the fund’s pool.

The Act established the Road Safety and Accident Victims Compensation Committee (RSAVCC) which would be responsible for overseeing the management of the fund, even as it stresses that, NAICOM shall pay compensation in accordance with its regulations to any person in respect of death or bodily injury following a motor vehicle accident caused by an uninsured vehicle or unidentified driver.

The Act stipulates that expenses reasonably incurred by a hospital known to have treated any person involved in any motor accident by an uninsured vehicle or unidentified driver must be settled from the fund.

The NIIRA 2025 is a transformative new law signed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu aimed at modernising and strengthening Nigeria’s insurance sector.

It consolidates several outdated insurance laws into a single, modern legal framework designed to drive financial stability, economic development, and inclusive growth in the insurance industry while supporting Nigeria’s goal of becoming a $1 trillion economy.

Key features of the NIIRA 2025 include: Higher capital requirements for insurance companies to ensure their financial soundness, with minimum capital thresholds set based on risk profiles (e.g., non-life insurance operators must have at least N25 billion); Mandatory enforcement of compulsory insurance policies, expanding coverage categories to include sectors like agriculture, public infrastructure, and cyber liability; Digitisation mandates improving access, reducing inefficiencies, and combating insurance fraud through digital value chains from underwriting to claims processing; Strict enforcement of timely claims settlements to enhance consumer protection.

Creation of policyholder protection funds to safeguard customers in cases where insurers become insolvent; More demanding licensing requirements and penalties for acting without proper authorisation in the insurance business as well as Expanded participation in regional insurance schemes, including the ECOWAS Brown Card System, to promote cross-border insurance cooperation.

The Act is designed to boost investor confidence, increase insurance penetration across Nigeria, and position Nigeria as a leading insurance hub within Africa.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Miden Systems Drags Bank to Court over  Alleged Forgery, Misappropriation

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Miden Systems Limited, an Abuja-based firm, has dragged Sterling Bank Limited and some of its management staff before the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Wuse Zone 2, Abuja, over allegations of conspiracy, forgery, fraud, criminal breach of trust, and misappropriation of funds running into over $200m.

Miden Systems Drags Bank to Court over  Alleged Forgery, Misappropriation

The case, presided over by Magistrate Njideka Duru, was slated for hearing on Monday but was stalled due to the ongoing Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Conference in Enugu.

The matter was subsequently adjourned to September 10 for mention.

In a 29-page charge filed through its counsel, Louis Alozie, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Miden Systems accused the bank, its Chief Executive Officer, Sterling Financial Holdings Company Plc, and four others of using the company’s name to illegally open accounts and siphon its domiciled funds.

The complainant alleged that the defendants diverted foreign currency revenues meant for loan settlements for their personal gain, carried out massive unauthorized debits on its account, and deliberately denied it access to account statements despite repeated requests.

According to Miden, the bank unlawfully placed a lien on all its accounts without notice, shut it out of internet banking, and even refused to issue cheque books, all in a bid to conceal suspicious transactions.

One instance cited in the charge revealed that when Miden remitted dollar revenues at a period when the exchange rate stood at N150/$1 (with the market rate at N198/$1), the bank allegedly stockpiled over N2bn in its account.

By the time the naira had depreciated to nearly N500/$1, the bank reportedly sold the funds at the higher rate, rendering the original value of the dollars “almost worthless.”

The company also accused the bank of fabricating a N30m loan facility in its name barely three months after it had cleared all outstanding loans in 2017. It contended that the loan was unsolicited, unauthorized, and approved with forged signatures purportedly belonging to its Board of Directors.

Within days of booking the loan, the bank allegedly disbursed over N30m to a single beneficiary identified only as “AA.”

Similarly, Miden claimed that a separate $3m loan was fraudulently booked to another firm, Chasewood Limited, which later denied ever applying for such.

The facility was then shifted to Miden’s account on the pretext that both companies were “sister companies” — a claim Miden insists is false since the two are independent entities with no ownership ties.

In another revelation, Miden said it discovered forged documentation linked to a loan facility allegedly granted to the defendants by Afrexim Bank, involving what it described as “massive identity theft.”

The company also accused the bank of opening additional accounts in its name using a fictitious office address in Wuse 2, Abuja, unknown to it.

The company noted that after several failed attempts to resolve the matter directly with the bank, it petitioned the House of Representatives Committee on Public Petitions.

Following its review, the committee referred the allegations to the Inspector-General of Police (IGP). An investigation was carried out, and in February 2025, the police reportedly indicted the defendants in their report.

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending