General News
Nigeria is Not an Internet Ready Country – Adeleke
Sam Adeleke is an electrical and communications engineering consultant and currently president of the Internet Service Providers Association of Nigeria (Ispan).
He spoke to chike onwuegbuchi.
Ispan
Ispan is the Internet Service Providers Association of Nigeria. It was established as an agitation of NCC licensed ISPs. You have to be an NCC licensed ISP before you can come in and we have quite a lot of ISPs that were licensed by the NCC and it was a common forum to formulate policies to help the industry grow and to assist one another in having a voice in dealing with regulators, government, customers and to have an avenue where the industry can be self regulated.
By and large, it was an opportunity for us to put our resources together, share ideas and benefit one another as well as benefit our customers.
Addressing the Challenge of ISP Dedicated Services
First of all let me say we have had a number of cases which we have handled in the past but let me analyse clearly that it is easy to say the problem is that of ISPs, but in most cases that we have found out, the problem is that of Nigerians themselves.
I tell you what; we are always in a hurry. Ordinarily, there should be a signed contract. When you sign up with an ISP, it is usually a one year contract so people do not understand the terms of the one year contract. The details of what they want or what they also do, they are ignorant of. What they do is to look at the bottom line which is the cheapest. For instance, most people would say I want to have a service that will serve 10 systems. If you have 10 systems in a corporate office, the bandwidth requirement may not be as much as that of five systems in a cybercafé. When people advertised and said five to 10 systems which I expect should be okay. When an individual opens 10 sites at once and chats at the same time, that individual’s capacity is that of 10 systems. The resultant effect is that the users themselves overload what they actually asked for. In advertisements, they do not specify whether it is dedicated or shared service. In shared bandwidth, there is what is called the contention ratio. Contention ratio is for instance, on the K-U band I am, I have a contention ratio of one to eight and on the C band, it is one to four. Even when I say 64 by 256 on the C band and 64 by 256 KU, you will not get the same thing because the contention ratio is different. People do not bother to find out what their contention ratio is when they are sharing. The second type of bandwidth is the Burstible. Burstible means for your up-link, you have a dedicated bandwidth but for your down-link, you have a contention ratio of one to two. That means if you are on 64 by 256, your up-link is 64 dedicated all the time but your down-link is 128 guaranteed but you can burst up to 256. Whereas if it is dedicated, it means you have allocated to you all the time 64 by 256. You will agree with me that the price of one to eight, one to four, one to two and one to one cannot be the same. What most people now look at is for example, I want 64 by 256, this man offers it at $100, yours is $500, it is too expensive so people don’t buy from you. But the man who is offering it at $100 buys from the same place as the man who offers it at $500 so they cannot offer the same service. In this area, there is need for understanding and dedication.
The second aspect where many people fall into is that of the volume of traffic that you pay for. Many people thought with their understanding of GSM and CDMA for instance, you pay N500 for Zain and they give you one Gigabyte, you pay N1,000 and you get three Gigabyte, the same with MTN. These are some of the things many people do not realize. If I am using this in a home, I may not utilize my one Gigabyte in a month whereas if it was a cybercafé, an individual can download loads of pictures, music and within 10 days utilize all the Gigabyte. What it means is that once it is finished, they cut you off, then they start discussing ISPs. The bottom line for many that were reported to us which we looked into, we found that it is lack of knowledge rather than cheating. Of course, we know that in advertising marketers know how to present the good side and not tell the down side. It is for buyers to beware. They are playing on people’s intelligence and people run to whichever one is the cheapest.
ISPs and Internet Exchange Point
Let me trace a little bit of history, we have been having association between us both in Lagos and Ibadan but the NCC said they wanted a good national internet exchange and they asked for proposals. Ispan presented a proposal just as many others presented. The model presented by Ispan was bought by NCC, a design was made, a consultant was engaged and fund was released for the implementation. All over the world, the internet exchange concept is the association of various communication or Internet providers so that they can exchange principally local contents and that is the only way the Internet can be cheap for local users. When it as done, the likes of the big wigs like MTN and the rest snobbed it, they were not part of it. When it was established, a board was set up and the likes of the big wigs were brought in. But since then ask me what happened, we were one step forward and we moved 10 steps backwards. For a whole year, in order to encourage everybody to come in, it was decided that nobody pays to join. Of course there were charges that were made there. Internet exchange is supposed to be a member exchange, in order words, it is not a profit making organization. Members are to determine charges and also decide the day to day running of the affairs of the exchange but it is now run like a profit oriented enterprise. The situation we have on ground is that there is lack of focus, we have lost the vision we had originally, rather than been a member organization, it has now become a regulatory organization. If it was member driven, nobody would be forced to join. There is a Corporate Affairs Commission paper on how the board should be chosen, how members are to join but these steps are not followed. It is not an organization that should seek subventions from the government like a ministry or parastatal. It is not a profit making organization, rather is it an arm of government. It is supposed to be an independent organization for participants in the exchange. Unless this is addressed, then we are going top have the Nigerian version of the Internet exchange which is different from what operates in the world.
Local Content
In the first instance, I want to say there are so many local contents already. An example is the case of the GSM and there are so many people who are doing various local contents and are making a lot of money from it and there are still a lot more that can be done. It is the atmosphere that determines the growth and otherwise of such contents. For instance, we were thinking of places like the Galleria. With the content they already have and they are linked to the Internet exchange which can be anywhere in Nigeria and their access is not necessarily going through the Internet but through the local Internet exchange, it would be a lot cheaper. You will not be heavily charged and Internet radio stations will spring up. We have the Nollywood movies which we can ride on, news can be gotten from the Internet bit the situation is if I have to download a film from the Galleria and I am going through the Internet, the cost of my bandwidth will increase because it is going to be so sluggish that I will not be able to bear the cost. But if it was through the local internet exchange, if it was working, the cost would be cheaper. Until that is working, the cost of using local content will be the same as getting it from abroad. Nigeria is a country where we have people with talents and innovative ideas, let someone come up with it and then you see others rushing to do it. It is not difficult to have increasing in local contents but the cost of delivery is the problem.
CDMA and GSM Internet Services at Cheaper Rates
I disagree that CDMA and GSM operators offer Internet services at cheaper rates. The technology of the CDMA and the GSM is to provide Internet as a secondary service not as a primary service, as a quick service not as a bulk service. For example, when Internet services were offered by radio for a 32 by 256 shared bandwidth, I was offering it for N20,000 a month with a cybercafé running 10 to 15 systems on it. You can imagine 10 to 15 people simultaneously working round the clock as it were because they do it day and night for a whole month. Then people had faster service relatively compared with a situation now where I pay N10,000 and I have a slow service that I cannot download on, which is just good enough for e-mails. The problem we are having is in two folds, we are not an Internet-ready country and we are not yet hungry for it. We are Internet users but not an Internet hungry society. If you take statistics of youths who use the Internet, you will find out that they use it only for e-mails, chatting and “yahoo yahoo”. If you take the statistics of the working class, they use it primarily for their businesses only. In the academics, you will be surprised that they do not use it even for research. We have over the years been preaching Internet penetration; I want to say that our attitude to the internet is akin to our attitude to reading. We need a change of orientation that has to start with the academic institutions be it primary, secondary or tertiary. We need to change our use of the Internet from just e-mails and chatting to proper research application in our day to day life. The CDMA or GSM as the case may be is used for just mobility.
The second problem is that of the big fish swallowing small fishes. The ISP business started as a small scale business and close to 500 ISPs were registered at a stage. The statistics which was done about one and a half years ago revealed that we have just about 100 surviving ISPs. Today, I doubt if we can boast of 20 to 30 ISPs because the big has swallowed up the small. This is an area where we have been talking to ourselves in the past. You will not like to sign up with an ISP where all access you have is at a location whereas if you sign up with a CDMA operator that has access in 100 cities across the country, you can move about with your laptop. This is what we could not offer as small companies but we came together that we might be able to offer this under the NCC’s sponsored Sabi programme which we also would have completed with MTN on one hand and the IXPN on the other hand because they were granted the same rights. That would have made us big players but the communication business in Nigeria is not a small man’s business.
Mergers
The issue of merger has been discussed over and over; it is something that is almost impossible. It would have been possible if there was a voice from the NCC just like there was from the CBN to the banks. But the NCC decided not to do it that way, they want to encourage Internet penetration even to where it may be unprofitable for the big players and that is only by allowing smaller organizations to play. That was why the NCC encouraged the establishment of cybercafés anywhere in Nigeria at a time without requiring them to be registered. The idea was to focus on Internet penetration. In Nigeria, businesses are not easy to merge especially when it is one man businesses. If there has been a voice to say this is the standard I expect of ISPs you either reach it or leave it and there is a set time for its implementation, then for us to remain in business, there would have been at least been legally binding marriages but this is what the NCC was not able to do.
Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the Federal Government’s alleged tax evasion case against Binance Holdings Ltd. cryptocurrency exchange, until September 24, 2026, to allow both parties more time to pursue an out-of-court settlement.
Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the new date on Thursday after Moses Ideho, counsel to the Federal Government, informed the court that discussions aimed at resolving the dispute amicably were still ongoing.
Ideho, a deputy director of Legal and Prosecution at the Nigeria Revenue Service (formerly the Federal Inland Revenue Service), told the court that the matter, which had been scheduled for a report on settlement or continuation of trial, could not proceed.
According to him, one reason for the delay was the reported elevation of Justice Nwite to the Court of Appeal, while the second was the continued reconciliation efforts between the parties.
“The parties are still exploring settlement in the charge that led to this case,” Ideho told the court.
Sunday Agaji, counsel to Binance, did not oppose the application for adjournment, following which Justice Nwite postponed proceedings until September 24 for either a report on the settlement discussions or continuation of trial.
The case was previously adjourned on May 12 after both the Federal Government and Binance informed the court that negotiations were underway to settle the matter outside the courtroom.
Binance had first indicated its willingness to pursue an amicable resolution on March 24.
The cryptocurrency company was re-arraigned on July 12, 2024, on a four-count charge bordering on alleged tax evasion.
Ayodele Omotilewa, Nigerian representative, pleaded not guilty on behalf of the company.
The re-arraignment followed the removal of Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan and his colleague, Nadeem Anjarwalla, from the charge after the Federal Government amended the case to make Binance Holdings Ltd the sole defendant.
Justice Nwite had, on June 14, 2024, discharged and struck out the names of Gambaryan and Anjarwalla after the prosecution filed the amended charge.
Binance is also facing a separate criminal prosecution by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which accuses the company of laundering about $35.4m.
In addition, the Nigeria Revenue Service is pursuing a separate civil suit against Binance before another judge of the Federal High Court, seeking approximately $79.5bn in alleged economic losses linked to the company’s operations in Nigeria.
Oodua Youth Coalition (OYC), a Yoruba socio-cultural group, has issued a notice to stage peaceful picketing at MTN Nigeria offices nationwide.
This action stems from the company’s alleged failure to publicly condemn recent xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa.
This is coming despite statement by Karl Toriola, chief executive officer, MTN Nigeria, who recently said that MTN may have originated from South Africa, he explained, but MTN Nigeria is a Nigerian publicly quoted company, managed by Nigerians and with a Nigerian board.
However, in a statement jointly signed Olatunji Adejuwon and Olaoye Abolaji,vice president and national secretary respectively of OYC, described MTN Nigeria’s silence as unacceptable, given the company’s South African roots and the patronage it enjoys from Nigerians
The coalition said it would proceed with a peaceful protest if the telecommunications company continued to ignore its demands, stressing that the action was intended to draw attention to the need for corporate responsibility and moral leadership in condemning xenophobic attacks against fellow Africans.
“Consequently, the Oodua Youth Coalition hereby gives notice that we shall, without hesitation, commence a peaceful picketing of MTN Nigeria’s offices if the company continues to ignore our legitimate demands.
“Our action is intended to draw attention to the need for corporate responsibility and moral leadership in condemning acts of xenophobia against fellow Africans,” the statement said.
The group renewed its call on MTN Nigeria to immediately convene a press conference, with representatives of the coalition in attendance, to unequivocally condemn the xenophobic attacks and reaffirm its commitment to the safety, dignity and unity of all Africans.
It maintained that the proposed protest would be peaceful, orderly and in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
According to the coalition, relevant security agencies have been notified of the planned action, while appropriate communications have also been sent to the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria.
“We once again call on MTN Nigeria to immediately convene a press conference, with representatives of the Oodua Youth Coalition in attendance, to unequivocally condemn the xenophobic attacks and reaffirm its commitment to the safety, dignity and unity of all Africans.
“We emphasise that our proposed action shall remain peaceful, orderly and in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Relevant security agencies have been duly notified, and appropriate communications have also been sent to the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria.”
Reaffirming its commitment to defending the rights and dignity of Nigerians, the coalition vowed not to relent until its concerns received the desired attention.
“The Oodua Youth Coalition remains committed to defending the dignity of Nigerians and promoting African solidarity. We will not relent until our concerns receive the attention they deserve,” the statement added.
Responding to the controversy, Toriola further condemned all forms of xenophobia and violence against Africans living in South Africa, insisting that MTN Nigeria is a Nigerian company with substantial local ownership.
“We unequivocally condemn any form of xenophobia, violence or attacks against any community in the world. We’re a Nigerian company, through and through. We’re listed on the stock exchange with over 201,000 retail investors, and 11 million people hold shares through their pension funds in MTN Nigeria.
“We provide the digital backbone of the economy, and we have a completely Nigerian entity.
“Yes, MTN was founded in South Africa, and the parent company that is the majority shareholder is South African. But let’s also look at it objectively. The shareholding of MTN Holding South Africa is only 50 per cent African.
“The remaining 50 per cent is from across the world — 27 per cent from the United States, with the rest from the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region,” Toriola said.
By Bidemi Oke
Every civilisation has been built on one invisible infrastructure. The Romans built roads. The Industrial Revolution built electricity. The Internet built information. The next economy may be built on something far less tangible.
Trust
That sounds counterintuitive because we have spent centuries believing that money is the foundation of every economy. It isn’t. Money has never been the foundation; it has simply been the mechanism through which trust is exchanged. Every major financial innovation, from coins and paper notes to credit cards, online banking and blockchain, has been humanity’s attempt to solve the same problem: “how do we help strangers trust one another without ever meeting?”
Seen through that lens, today’s financial revolution looks very different.
Most discussions about digital finance revolve around whether cash will disappear. We debate mobile wallets, central bank digital currencies, cryptocurrency, real-time payments and digital banking. Yet these conversations often mistake the visible change for the actual transformation.
The real shift is not that money is becoming digital. The real shift is that trust is becoming programmable. That single idea explains why the financial landscape is changing faster than many people realize.
For decades, finance has depended on institutions to create confidence. Banks verified identities, governments authenticated currencies, contracts relied on lawyers, payment networks validated transactions and every exchange involved an intermediary whose primary role was to reassure two parties that the system could be trusted.
Technology is quietly rewriting that arrangement
Today, identities can be verified digitally. Transactions can be authenticated within seconds, smart contracts can execute agreements automatically once predefined conditions are met, and artificial intelligence can detect suspicious activity before humans notice it. Increasingly, confidence is being built into the infrastructure itself rather than added afterwards.
This is why I believe we need a new way to think about the evolution of finance, not as a journey from cash to digital payments, but as “three generations of financial trust”.
The first generation was Physical Trust. Trust was tied to tangible assets like gold, paper currency, handwritten signatures and face-to-face interactions. Confidence came from what people could physically see and hold.
The second generation was Institutional Trust. As economies expanded, institutions became the guarantors of financial confidence. Banks, regulators, payment networks and financial intermediaries enabled transactions at a scale impossible through personal relationships alone. Trust shifted from physical objects to established organisations.
We are now entering the third generation: Programmable Trust.
Here, trust is embedded directly into technology. Verification happens automatically. Payments settle in real time, financial services become integrated into everyday experiences instead of existing as separate destinations. Increasingly, people interact with trusted systems rather than trusted institutions alone. That distinction is more profound than it first appears.
Many organisations still measure digital transformation by counting how many services have moved online, but digitising an existing process is not the same as redesigning how trust flows through an economy. Converting paperwork into an application does not automatically create a digital financial ecosystem.
This explains why some economies process millions of digital transactions every day yet continue to face friction, inefficiency and limited financial inclusion. The missing ingredient is rarely another payment platform. More often, it is interoperable infrastructure, trusted digital identity, consistent regulation and systems capable of working together seamlessly.
In other words, the future of finance will not be determined by who builds the fastest application. It will be determined by who builds the most trusted ecosystem.
This has significant implications for Africa. The continent has rightly earned global recognition for accelerating digital financial adoption. Yet the next opportunity extends beyond increasing transaction volumes. The greater challenge is designing financial infrastructure where payments, identity, data, compliance and commerce interact intelligently rather than operating in isolation.
That is where long-term competitive advantage will emerge. Perhaps the greatest irony of all is that the more advanced finance becomes, the less visible it will appear.
People rarely think about the internet protocols that power a video call or the cloud infrastructure supporting an online purchase. Likewise, future generations may hardly think about payment rails, settlement networks or blockchain architecture. Financial experiences will simply happen securely, instantly and almost invisibly.
History suggests that successful technologies eventually disappear from our attention not because they become less important, but because they become so reliable that we stop noticing them altogether.
So, are we entering a fully digital financial economy? Perhaps that is no longer the right question.
A more useful question is whether we are entering an economy where trust itself becomes digital infrastructure because if that is true, then the organisations shaping the future of finance are not merely moving money more efficiently.
They are redesigning how entire economies create confidence at scale and that may prove to be the most valuable innovation of all.
Bidemi Oke is the Chief Executive Officer of FlashChange, a fintech platform focused on secure digital asset exchange. He is an entrepreneur and vibrant leader, recognized for driving innovation and redefining access in the financial technology industry.
Court Adjourns Alleged Binance Tax Evasion Case over Settlement Talks
Fixed Wired Internet Market Lags as Mobile Gains Ground
Xenophobic Attacks: OYC Threatens to Picket MTN Nigeria Offices
New NIMC Act Strengthens Data Protection, Privacy – Director
BON Establishes Six Ad Hoc Committees to Modernize Broadcasting
NASENI Moves to Digitize CCB’s 5m Assets Declaration and Operations
Mobile Internet Gender Gap Widest in Africa – GSMA
Nigeria Launches FreeTV Nationwide
CANAL+ Partners Samsung to Pre-Load DStv Stream on New Samsung TVs In Nigeria, Other African Countries
Lebara Nigeria Launches Lebara Play, Africa’s First Telecom-Owned Micro-Drama Platform
News3 days agoNRC, Ponzi Scheme Collapses Resulting Loss of Billions of Naira
News3 days agoNSITF Partners South African Insurer on Digital Transformation
E-Financial3 days agoFCT-IRS Unveils New Digital Platform, Taxporta
General News3 days agoKPMG Urges Africa’s Most Innovative Tech Entrepreneurs to Enter the Global Tech Innovator 2026 Competition
E-Business3 days agoFG Suspends New Internet Regulations to Prevent Overlapping Rules
E-Business3 days agoNIN Enrollment Hits over 136m as New ID Law Takes Effect
Telecom2 days agoNCC Seeks Cost-Based Pricing Framework for Ducts
E-Business3 days agoPlateau PCC Collects Nigerians’ Data without Privacy Policy – FIJ