Connect with us

General News

Subscribers Privacy and Unsolicited SMS

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Some weeks back Mr. Peter Igho, Director-General, National Lottery Regulatory Commission (NLRC) asked telecommunications operators to stop sending unsolicited text messages on their lottery promotions to subscribers. Though operators to large extent are heeding to this directive on promos but are consistently sending short message service (SMS) on other sundry issues such as urging subscribers to subscriber to one short code for daily motivational words as well as advertising products. Mobile phone spam is a form of spamming directed at the text messaging service of a mobile phone. It is described as mobile spamming, SMS spam, text spam or m-spam. As the popularity of mobile phones surged in the early 2000s, frequent users of text messaging began to see an increase in the number of unsolicited (and generally unwanted) commercial advertisements being sent to their telephones through text messaging. This can be particularly annoying for the recipient because, unlike in email, some recipients may be charged a fee for every message received, including spam. Mobile phone users often times queries how the organization or individual that generated such message got their mobile phone number, some often times accused their network operators of compromising on their privacy. However, network operators have argued that there are different ways through which such people gain access to such data as people fill forms for different purposes. But, as true this argument may be network operators’ staff could not be exonerated from conniving with those who generate these unsolicited mails to divulge data of subscribers. This writer sometime in December last year received an SMS from customer call centre of another network urging him to subscriber to its post paid package. The question that arises is how did the people that generated that message known that he is a post paid subscriber? Nigeria CommunicationsWeek had reported how some politicians were besieging SIM card registration centres in a bid to collate mobile phone numbers of subscribers in Lagos for campaign before last year elections. It is against this backdrop that the GSMA announced the publication of its Mobile Privacy Principles. The principles describe the way in which mobile consumers’ privacy should be respected and protected when consumers use mobile applications and services that access, use or collect their personal information. The principles are the result of close collaboration by leading mobile operators and input from other players in the wider mobile eco-system. The Mobile Privacy Principles will be used to develop more detailed guidelines and codes of conduct to address specific consumer concerns such as the use of private data or location details by applications. They pave the way for the development of clear and simple ways for customers to manage their information and their privacy on mobile phones. The key challenge is to find new mobile-friendly methods to help consumers make informed decisions about their privacy. One key principle relates to ‘transparency and notice’, which is about being open and honest with customers about what personal information is being collected and why. The principles also cover issues such as the need to provide consumers with control over how their personal information is used and by whom, and ensuring only a minimum amount of data for a given service is collected and that it is retained no longer than necessary. The GSMA is examining these issues in depth and reaching out to broader industry stakeholders to establish a broad consensus on how to ensure consumers’ privacy is treated more consistently across mobile applications and across platforms and services whilst continuing to support innovation. According to Tom Phillips, chief regulatory officer, GSMA, “The Mobile Privacy Principles are a significant first step but addressing mobile privacy is an ongoing challenge that requires the support and collaboration of the wider internet industry, civil society and regulators, working together, if we are to deliver real protection for consumers. This is a call to action to the broader industry.” Mobile phone spam is generally less pervasive than email spam, where in 2010 around 90% of email is spam. The amount of mobile spam varies widely from region to region. In North America, much less than 1% of SMS messages were spam in 2010, while in parts of Asia up to 30% of messages were spam. The lesser and geographically uneven prevalence of mobile phone spam is attributable to the higher cost (to spammers) of and technological barriers to sending mobile messages in some areas, and to law enforcement in others. Today, particularly in North America, most mobile phone spam is sent from mobile devices that have prepaid unlimited messaging rate plans. While the rate plans allow for unlimited messaging, in reality the relatively slow sending rate (on the order of magnitude of 1/s) limits the number of messages that may be sent before an abusing mobile is shut down. SMS spam is illegal under common law in most jurisdictions as trespass to chattels. Jurisdictions with specific SMS spam regulation and fines include Australia, the EU and others; in the US, violators face substantial costs; in a 2008 settlement, the violator agreed to pay $150 to each spam recipient. In a 2010 class action settlement of Satterfield v Simon & Schuster, a case that reached the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, plaintiffs agreed to pay $175 to each spam recipient. In response to Satterfield, entities who make money sending mobile phone spam formed the Mobile Advocacy Coalition (MAC) to lobby the government to legalize that activity. In the US, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expanded Phone Spam regulations to cover also Voice Spam—mostly in form of prerecorded telemarketing calls—commonly known as robocalls; victims can file a complaint with the FCC. However, in view of the policy of Sim card registration of subscribers, there should be legislation to protect such information from being compromised by operators or their agents.


Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

General News

Lawyer Drags FG Court over Controversial Health Data Sharing Agreement with US

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Okpi Bernard Adaafu, a legal practitioner, has dragged the federal government of Nigeria before the Federal High Court in Abuja, challenging the legality of a controversial health data sharing agreement between Nigeria and the United States of America.

Lawyer Drags FG Court over Controversial Health Data Sharing Agreement with US

The suit names the President of Nigeria, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, the Senate President of Nigeria, and the Speaker of the Nigerian House of Representatives as defendants.

In the originating summons filed before the court, Adaafu is asking the court to determine whether the bilateral health cooperation Memorandum of Understanding signed between Nigeria and the United States violates the constitutional rights of Nigerian citizens, particularly their rights to privacy and protection of personal data.

According to court documents, the agreement, signed on December 19, 2025, permits the collection and transfer of sensitive health information of Nigerians to the United States.

The data reportedly includes medical records, blood samples, pathogen testing information, and DNA or genetic sequencing data.

The plaintiff argued that while only a summarized version of the agreement has been made public, a related Specimen Sharing Agreement allegedly obliges Nigeria to provide biological samples and related data to the United States within five days of request and could remain in force for up to 25 years.

He contended that such an arrangement, if implemented, would violate the National Health Act 2014, which guarantees the confidentiality of patients’ medical records, as well as the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, regulating the processing and cross-border transfer of personal data.

The suit further argued that the agreement breaches Section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, which guarantees the privacy of citizens.

Adaafu also raised concerns about statements suggesting that the programme would provide substantial support to Christian faith-based healthcare institutions.

According to him, the inclusion or perceived emphasis on religious affiliation within a national healthcare framework is unnecessary, constitutionally questionable, and capable of triggering avoidable social tension in a multi-faith society such as Nigeria.

He argued that healthcare interventions funded through international cooperation must remain neutral, inclusive, and accessible to all Nigerians regardless of religion, ethnicity, or social background.

Another issue raised in the suit is the alleged exclusion of the National Assembly of Nigeria from the process.

The plaintiff maintained that international agreements with significant national implications must undergo legislative scrutiny and approval before implementation.

Among the reliefs sought, Adaafu asked the court to issue an order prohibiting discriminatory agreements based on religion, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics.

He also requested a declaration that the agreement violates both the National Health Act 2014 and the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023.

In addition, the plaintiff is seeking an order suspending the implementation of the agreement, which is scheduled to commence on April 1, 2026.

Explaining the reason for filing the suit, Adaafu said he decided to approach the court because of the potential implications of the agreement on the privacy, sovereignty, and constitutional rights of more than 200 million Nigerians.

He noted that the issues raised in the suit deserve public awareness and national discourse, stressing that transparency and accountability are necessary in matters involving citizens’ sensitive medical and genetic information.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Indomie Backs 15-Year-Old’s Guinness Record-Bound Ride to Raise Autism Awareness

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria’s leading instant noodle brand, Indomie, is backing a cross-country cycling journey by 15-year-old autism advocate Kanyeyachukwu Tagbo, who is embarking on a Guinness World Record-bound ride from Enugu to Lagos to raise awarenessabout autism and promote inclusion.

Tagged “Journey of Possibility, #RideWithKanye,” the expedition will see the young cyclist travel across several Nigerian cities as he advocates for greater understanding and support for individuals living with Autism Spectrum Disorder and their families.

The initiative represents an official attempt to set a milestone with Guinness World Records as the youngest autistic individual to complete a cross-country cycling journey.

The ride is scheduled to conclude in Lagos on World Autism Awareness Day, reinforcing the global call for empathy, acceptance, and opportunity for people on the autism spectrum.

Speaking on the brand’s involvement, Temitope Ashiwaju, Group Corporate Communications and Events Manager, said the initiative reflects Indomie’s enduring commitment to celebrating courageous Nigerian children and amplifying stories that inspire hope.

“At Indomie, we believe every child deserves the opportunity to dream boldly and achieve extraordinary things,” he said. “Kanyeyachukwu’s journey is a powerful reminder that determination and talent can transcend limitations. We are proud to support his mission to inspire understanding, acceptance, and hope for individuals living with autism.”

Kanyeyachukwu first captured national attention when he was recognised at the Indomie Heroes Awards, an initiative by Indomie that celebrates courageous Nigerian children who have demonstrated exceptional bravery, resilience, and impact in their communities.

Since receiving the recognition, he has continued to use advocacy, creativity, and public engagement to reshape perceptions about autism and inspire conversations around inclusion.

Through the “Journey of Possibility,” Kanyeyachukwu hopes to demonstrate that individuals on the autism spectrum possess extraordinary potential when given the opportunity and support to thrive.

As a key supporter of the initiative, Indomie will provide branded cycling kits and support materials for cyclists accompanying him throughout the route, alongside financial support and brand activations at designated stops along the journey.

These engagements will include community interactions aimed at educating the public, encouraging dialogue, and fostering broader participation in autism advocacy.

To ensure the young cyclist’s safety and well-being throughout the expedition, a dedicated safety, medical, and logistics team will accompany the ride.

Host communities along the route are also expected to organise welcome receptions and awareness activities as the team passes through their cities.

The journey will culminate in a celebratory reception in Lagos, bringing together supporters, advocates, community leaders, and partners to mark the completion of the ride and reinforce the call for greater awareness and inclusion for people on the autism spectrum.

Through initiatives like the Indomie Heroes Awards and its support for the “Journey of Possibility, #RideWithKanye,” Indomie continues to champion young Nigerians whose courage, determination, and achievements demonstrate the limitless possibilities that emerge when children are empowered to pursue their dreams.

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Interswitch Advocates Trust-Driven Infrastructure as Cornerstones of Africa’s Cross-Border Capital Future

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Interswitch Group, one of Africa’s leading integrated payments and digital commerce companies, has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing a seamless and inclusive financial ecosystem across the continent at the recently concluded Inclusive Fintech Forum 2026, which held at the Kigali Convention Centre, in Rwanda from 10 -12 March 2026.

Speaking during a high-level session themed “Financial Centres & the Future of Cross-Border Capital” Akeem Lawal, Managing Director, Payments Processing & Switching (Interswitch Purepay), highlighted the critical factors shaping the next phase of financial integration across Africa.

He noted that while rapid advancements in digital technology have made it possible for capital to move across borders at unprecedented speed, the ultimate destination and impact of such capital flows are determined by trust, robust infrastructure, and strategic collaboration.

According to Lawal, as Africa’s economies continue to digitize and integrate, stakeholders must prioritize building resilient payment systems and fostering partnerships that enhance transparency, interoperability, and shared prosperity.

He emphasized that sustainable growth in cross-border financial flows will depend not only on technological innovation but also on the collective ability of institutions to inspire confidence and enable seamless transactions at scale.

Throughout the forum’s engagements, Interswitch, as one of Africa’s leading and pioneering digital technology enablers reiterated its long-standing vision of fostering a prosperous and interconnected Africa. The company continues to champion the development of a secure, technologically advanced digital payments ecosystem designed to connect and empower individuals, businesses, governments, and communities across the continent.

Participation at the Inclusive Fintech Forum underscores Interswitch’s strategic focus on driving thought leadership, strengthening regional collaboration, and supporting initiatives that accelerate financial inclusion and economic resilience.

As Africa navigates the evolving landscape of digital finance and cross-border commerce, Interswitch remains committed to delivering innovative solutions and partnerships that unlock opportunities for growth and shared value creation.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending