E-Financial
Court Orders First Bank to Pay Olisa Agbakoba N266m for Breach of Contract

First Bank of Nigeria Limited has been ordered by a federal high court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, to pay one of its customers, Mr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), a notable lawyer in the country, the sum of N266.4 million as general damages against the bank for mismanaging his share portfolio investment account.
The verdict of the court was as a result of a suit filed Mr Agbakoba against First Bank claiming sundry reliefs.
In his statement of claim filed before the court by a partner in the law firm of Agbakoba and Associates Babatunde Ogungbamila on behalf of the human rights lawyer, he alleged that as a result of bankers/customer relationship between him and the bank; sometime in 2008, the bank introduced its margin trading facility to him, which he accepted.
He said First Bank explained to him that the bank’s customers were to purchase shares with the advanced margin trading facility and pledge the shares to the bank.
The bank, for a management fee, was to professionally manage the advanced facility by selecting the broker and securities the facility would be invested into.
He said the bank would also prepare all the paper work needed, provide information about the funds’ holdings and performances and reserved the power to exit should the fund diminish to a threshold that could impair the economic underpinnings of the investment and left the bank’s exposure uncovered.
According to the customer, the bank claimed to possess the requisite knowledge, skills and expertise to seamlessly manage the investment in a win-win situation under terms and conditions that limited the exposure of the customers who were to rely on the expertise of the bank to manage the investment.
Consequently, the bank requested and encouraged him as a customer to take the margin loan contract.
On the strength assurance, the plaintiffs applied for a margin trading facility of N200 million with the plaintiff and the bank opening a joint special reserve lien account with the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS), whereby First Bank Limited was the sole signatory to the lien account.
The plaintiff said he also provided shares worth N60 million as his own contribution in line with the margin trading facility agreement.
Mr Olisa Agbakoba
It was fundamental to the margin loan agreement that if the plaintiff was unable to regularize the account within 5 days following the margin call, the bank has the duty to sell the shares and apply the value of the shares appreciate to cover the required margin.
However, the plaintiff averred that the bank did not take reasonable care to ensure the performance of the contract and observe compliance with all terms and conditions of their agreement in relation to the transaction as the bank failed to monitor the stock market and advise the plaintiff accordingly as it was obliged by the margin loan agreement, while the value of the shares continued a steady decline the plaintiff was utterly left in the dark regarding the value of the share portfolio in spite of repeated demands by the plaintiff for information from the bank.
In a particular of the fraudulent inducement, First Bank held itself out as possessing the requisite knowledge, skills and expertise to seamlessly manage the investment in a win-win situation while offering the plaintiff the product, consequently the breach of the margin trading facility agreement, fraudulent misrepresentations and mismanagement of the plaintiff’s account by the bank occasioned huge loses to the plaintiff.
The principal sum of N200 million was completely lost, the plaintiff paid a total sum of N250,434,639.13 in liquidation of the margin loan account excluding interest and other charges.
It was disclosed that the plaintiff’s 30 percent equity contribution valued at N60 million was completely lost and N40 million out of this would have been saved if the shares were sold at the second trigger point, N768,454,85 cost of cancellation of transfer of the debt to AMCON.
During hearing of the case, Mr Agbakoba testified for himself and tendered 22 exhibits.
However, in amended statement of defence filed before the court by Professor G. Elias (SAN), First Bank, while denying almost the claims of Mr Agbakoba, contended that it is not in any way liable to the plaintiff either in contract or tort as the plaintiff was aware of the volatility of the operations of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) and the speculative nature of the price of the stocks traded thereon and voluntarily assumed the business risks involved therein by applying for the loan from the bank and applying for the loan proceeds to buy shares, thereon the bank has never been the plaintiff’s investment manager.
He said the bank’s obligations were limited to the administrative of the facility itself, not the shares. The said administration involved the bank taking steps to ensure payments of the principal sum and the interest and monitoring movements on the bank’s lien account not share account by debiting and crediting relevant accounts towards repayment of the facility.
He said the bank was never a “joint venture” participant in the shares investment business undertaken by the plaintiff with the facility proceeds.
According to him, the bank’s role in the facility transaction was that of a lender and not that of a co-investor or asset manager.
Consequently, the bank denied that it acted in breach of contract or breach of any legal duty, therefore the plaintiff is not entitled to any sum as the plaintiff’s claims against the bank are vexations and without merit and should be dismissed with substantial costs.
In his judgment, Justice Muslim Hassan held that, “I am in agreement with the submission of learned counsel for the plaintiff that the bank failed to honour its contractual obligation as contained in the margin loan agreement and as a result the plaintiff suffered damages.
“The position of the defendant is akin to a situation where a party to a contract in the absence of any agreement to the contrary takes a benefit of a contract and refuses to accept liability as a result of his inaction or negligence, no court in Nigeria would allow that.
“From the foregoing, I hold that the plaintiff has proved his case against the defendant. I hereby make the following orders.
“An order is made against the bank for the payment of N20 million as general damages against the bank for mismanagement of the plaintiffs share portfolio investment.
“An order is made against First Bank for the payment of the sum of N200 million principal sum lost by the plaintiff as a result of the bank’s breach.
“An order is made against the bank for the payment of the sum of N40 million to the plaintiff which would have been saved out of the plaintiff equity contributions were the shares sold at the second trigger point.
“An order is made against the bank for the payment of the sum N768,454,85 to the plaintiff being the cost of cancellation of transfer of the debt to AMCON.
“An order is made against the defendant for the payment of the sum of N5.6 million for loss of dividend that accrued from plaintiffs Diamond Bank shares in April 2008.
“Payment of the sum of N5 million as a cost of this action is refused as the plaintiff failed to prove how he arrived at that figure, more so the plaintiff cannot transfer his legal fees to the bank.
“An order for the payment of interest on the judgment sums awarded against the bank in favour of the plaintiffs from the date of judgement at the rate of 17 percent per annum until judgment sums are paid.”
E-Financial
AI-Powered Loan Recovery Pilot Rakes in N69m for VeendHQ

VeendHQ has said that its AI-powered credit platform, Vida AI, helped recover N69 million from a N172.5 million portfolio of loans that were more than 90 days overdue, in a pilot that highlights the growing role of technology in loan recovery and portfolio management.

The result comes at a time when lenders are under increasing pressure to improve recovery outcomes while managing the cost, reputational risk, and operational burden associated with overdue loans.
For many credit providers, the challenge is no longer only how quickly loans can be approved, but how effectively repayment can be monitored and delinquent loans can be recovered after disbursement.
According to VeendHQ, the pilot delivered a 40 percent recovery rate on the overdue loan portfolio.
The company said the result significantly outperformed traditional recovery benchmarks, where a five percent recovery rate on a similar loan book would amount to about N8.6 million.
VeendHQ said the pilot demonstrates how Vida AI can support lenders beyond credit assessment, extending into repayment monitoring, collections, and recovery.
“Credit access is only one side of lending. The bigger challenge for many lenders is what happens after disbursement,” said Olufemi Olanipekun, co-founder and CEO of VeendHQ.
“Vida AI helps lenders make smarter decisions across the credit lifecycle, from approval to repayment and recovery.”
VeendHQ, a Nigerian fintech company building digital credit infrastructure, developed Vida AI as an artificial intelligence-powered platform for lenders, merchants, and financial institutions.
The platform supports credit assessment, identity verification, repayment collections, and loan management workflows.
With the recovery pilot, the company is positioning Vida AI beyond loan origination, as a tool for lenders seeking to improve repayment performance and manage overdue portfolios more efficiently.
Delinquent loans remain a major cash-flow challenge for lenders.
Once loans exceed 60 to 90 days past due, recovery becomes more difficult, expensive, and unpredictable. Traditional approaches such as manual calls, recovery agents, and legal escalation often increase costs without significantly improving recovery rates.
VeendHQ said Vida AI’s recovery workflow enables lenders to upload overdue loan records, verify borrower information, assess repayment capacity, and trigger automated recovery actions.
This gives lenders better visibility after disbursement and allows recovery teams to prioritize overdue portfolios more effectively.
“If lenders cannot recover efficiently, they become more conservative with lending. That affects consumers, small businesses, and the wider credit market,” Olanipekun said.
“Better recovery infrastructure gives lenders more confidence to lend, manage risk, and keep credit flowing.”
The company said the recovery use case is especially relevant for banks, microfinance institutions, digital lenders, cooperatives, and merchants managing loans that are 60 to 180 days past due.
It added that it plans to deepen Vida AI’s recovery capabilities for credit providers seeking to improve recovery performance without relying solely on manual methods.
“As lending expands across Nigeria and Africa, recovery infrastructure is becoming as critical as origination,” Olanipekun said. “Tools that improve both will define which lenders can scale sustainably.”
The pilot, VeendHQ says, points to a broader shift in the credit market: approval speed alone is no longer enough. Increasingly, lenders will be defined by how effectively they monitor repayment, recover overdue loans, and manage portfolio risk over time.
E-Financial
CBN Orders Banks, Fintechs to Host Payment Data Locally

The Central Bank of Nigeria has directed banks, fintech firms, and other payment service providers to store payment transaction data generated within the country on local servers from January 1, 2027, as part of new measures to strengthen oversight of the fast-growing digital payments ecosystem.

The directive was contained in a circular issued by the Payments System Supervision Department of the CBN on Monday and addressed to deposit money banks, microfinance banks, mobile money operators, switching and processing companies, payment terminal service providers, payment solution service providers, super agents and other licensed operators in the payments industry.
The circular, signed by the Director of the Payments System Supervision Department, Rakiya Yusuf, also introduced new market structure rules, beneficial ownership disclosure requirements and systemic oversight measures for payment service operators.
According to the apex bank, the reforms became necessary following the rapid expansion of electronic payments and digital financial services across the country.
The CBN said it had observed “significant structural developments within the Nigerian Payments ecosystem, characterised by rapid growth in electronic payments, increasing adoption of digital financial services, and the emergence of operators with substantial market presence across key payment activities.”
It noted that while the growth had improved innovation, efficiency and financial inclusion, it had also created concerns around market concentration, operational dependence, ownership transparency and the storage of critical payments data.
To address these concerns, the regulator ordered all financial institutions facilitating payments in Nigeria to ensure that transaction data generated within the country are stored domestically.
The circular stated, “All Financial Institutions and participants facilitating payments within Nigeria shall ensure that payments transaction data generated within Nigeria are stored and managed in Nigeria in accordance with data protection laws and regulations applicable in Nigeria.”
It added that “all affected Financial Institutions shall fully comply with this requirement effective January 1, 2027.”
The move is expected to strengthen regulatory oversight, enhance data sovereignty and ensure that sensitive payment information remains within Nigeria’s jurisdiction.
It also aligns with broader efforts by regulators globally to localise critical financial data and reduce reliance on offshore infrastructure.
Beyond data localisation, the CBN ordered banks, payment service providers and other financial institutions with digital payment operations to disclose the ultimate beneficial ownership of significant shareholders.
According to the circular, institutions must maintain accurate and up-to-date records of their ultimate beneficial owners and make such information available to the apex bank upon request.
The regulator said the disclosure requirement must comply with existing anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing and counter-proliferation financing regulations.
The directive builds on previous CBN efforts to strengthen beneficial ownership transparency as part of wider measures to combat money laundering and illicit financial flows in the financial system.
The central bank also introduced fresh competition rules aimed at limiting excessive market dominance in the payments industry.
Under the new framework, any financial institution that controls more than 25 per cent of the card-issuing market in a rolling 12-month period will not be allowed to hold more than 15 per cent of the merchant-acquiring market during the same period.
Similarly, operators with more than 25 per cent market share in merchant acquiring activities will be restricted to a maximum of 15 per cent market share in card issuing activities.
Merchant acquiring refers to processing card payments on behalf of merchants, while card issuing involves providing payment cards to customers.
The CBN said all regulated entities would be required to submit monthly market share returns based on prescribed templates and timelines.
It further directed affected institutions to take the necessary measures to achieve full compliance with the market structure requirements by December 31, 2026.
The apex bank said the new measures were designed to “improve transparency through beneficial ownership disclosure, address concentration risk, promote a fair, competitive, and resilient payments ecosystem.”
According to the regulator, the reforms are also intended to “safeguard the integrity of the Nigerian payments system and ensure the localisation of payments transaction data within Nigeria.”
The CBN warned that it would closely monitor compliance and impose sanctions where necessary.
“The CBN shall monitor compliance with the provisions of this Circular and may, where necessary, impose supervisory sanctions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines,” the circular stated.
The latest directive comes amid a rapid expansion of Nigeria’s digital payments industry, with electronic transactions reaching record levels and regulators increasing oversight of banks, fintech firms and other payment operators to address operational, cybersecurity and systemic risks.
E-Financial
Analysts Warn of Growing “Crowded Trade” in Foreign Exchange Markets

Foreign exchange markets are entering a phase where how traders are positioned may matter as much as the economic fundamentals driving those positions, according to a new market analysis from JustMarkets.

JustMarkets
The brokerage’s latest commentary points to a build-up in trades tied to the US dollar and to carry strategies, bets that exploit interest rate differentials between currencies, as a growing source of risk heading into the coming weeks.
The dollar has been supported by elevated US interest rates and pushed-back expectations for rate cuts, conditions that have encouraged more traders to pile into similar carry positions. While the macro case behind these trades remains intact for now, JustMarkets cautions that when positioning becomes this lopsided, even sound trades can become vulnerable to sudden, sharp reversals.
A “crowded trade” isn’t inherently a red flag, the analysis notes, it can simply reflect a widely shared, fundamentally sound view. The danger emerges when too many participants are leaning the same way and conditions shift: traders rush to exit together, stop-loss orders cluster around similar price levels, and liquidity can evaporate just as prices move fastest. The combination, JustMarkets says, often produces a cascade effect that accelerates price moves in the opposite direction.
Notably, the analysis argues that reversals in crowded trades rarely require a major shock. Instead, minor developments, a softer-than-expected economic print, a subtle shift in central bank language, or fresh geopolitical headlines, can be enough to make traders question whether their positions still make sense. Once that doubt spreads, unwinding tends to happen in unison, amplifying both the speed and scale of the move.
Carry trades are singled out as particularly exposed in this environment. They tend to perform well during calmer periods but can unravel quickly once markets shift from “risk-on” to “risk-off,” triggering rapid liquidations and sharp corrections in carry positions.
JustMarkets argues that the current backdrop, marked by elevated geopolitical tension, persistent inflation, and lingering uncertainty over the path of monetary policy, leaves markets more exposed to positioning-driven swings than in previous cycles. Trader sentiment, the analysis suggests, is playing an outsized role alongside the usual response to economic data and headlines.
With crowded conditions raising the odds of fast, disorderly moves, the quality of trade execution becomes more consequential, the analysis notes, citing slippage, wider spreads, and order delays as factors that can compound losses during volatile swings.
On managing risk, JustMarkets’ analysts recommend that traders: Avoid overexposure to the dominant macro narrative of the moment, pay closer attention to positioning and sentiment indicators, maintain disciplined stop-loss orders ahead of potential downturn and pPrepare for higher volatility and faster price action than usual.
Markets become crowded periodically, and when they do, the risk of a sharp, sudden reversal rises with them. For now, JustMarkets’ broader message to traders is one of caution: with positioning levels elevated across USD and carry trades, vigilance on execution and risk management will likely matter more than usual in the weeks ahead.
E-Business2 days agoAI-Powered Cyber Threats Put Nigerian Banks on Alert
E-Business2 days agoCSOs Raise Alarm over Nigeria’s Data Protection Crisis
General News2 days ago₦5m up for Grabs as 10 Startups Clash at the Gathering on 100 Pitchathon Aba
E-Financial2 days agoCBN to Expand eNaira for Salaries, Pensions and Welfare Payments
General News2 days agoCBN Moves to Stop Banks From Using Customers’ Money for Fintech Subsidiaries
E-Financial2 days agoCBN to Bar HoldCos from Influencing Banks’ Lending Decisions
Telecom2 days agoNITDA Reveals Why AI Could Be Nigeria’s Biggest Wealth Creator, Not Oil
Telecom2 days agoNASENI Unveils Ambitious Plan to Produce 600 Million Diagnostic Kits Annually














