General News
Case for Intervention Fund in Telecom

In few years, Nigeria has grown from being one of the most under-served telecommunications market in Africa to one of the fastest growing in the world.
The licensing of digital mobile and fixed wireless operators unleashed a wave of local and international investment for over a decade now with the pace still showing no sign of slowing down.
As a result of this, Nigeria is now the largest mobile telephony market in Africa in terms of subscription figures as the country recently, crossed the milestone of 101million connected phone lines.
However, despite the massive increase in subscribers’ lines, Nigeria’s huge population and land mass has created a situation in which market demand is still running way ahead of supply.
As operators have struggled to meet market demand, one of the most noticeable challenges is the infrastructure deficit that is prevalent in the telecommunications sectors as in many other areas of the economy.
This led the Nigerian Communications Commission to initiate the Wire Nigeria project, (WiN) under its Universal Service Provision Fund, USPF.
USPF is a special fund set up by the Federal Government under the National Communications Act 2003, designed to provide telecommunications and ICT services to unserved, underserved and deprived groups and communities in the country.
The fund comprises one per cent levy of annual profit of telecom operators in Nigeria. The USPF has been involved in promoting ubiquitous connectivity in Nigeria, facilitating community communication centers in underserved and unserved areas of Nigeria, facilitating among other projects.
As a scheme under USPF, WiN is a telecom subsidy project aimed at expanding the transmission network across the length and breadth of the country.
The project is focused at cabling the whole country in the shortest possible time with the objective to ensure that no place in the country should be farther than 30 miles from the backbone infrastructure.
By this, all hinterlands can be connected with the hope of boosting commerce and trade in those places as well as meeting basic communications needs. So far, hundreds of KM’s of new optic fiber cables have been installed under the WiN programme.
This is obviously an unsung story of subsidy success in Nigeria.
Globally, government subsidy has always been a way to aid faltering businesses. During what was called ‘The Great Recession’, the United States government subsidized many vital sectors of the country’s economy.
To aid the development and exploration of the energy sector, the U.S government provided subsidies for businesses in the energy sector.
A broad variety of tax accounting allowances, credits, exemptions, deductions, depreciation and other financially beneficial tax breaks were given by the federal government to energy producers.
Up till now, in order to assure power availability at lower than market price, the U.S government owns certain dams which generate hydroelectric power.
The government also still provides subsidy to the agricultural sector. Some of the agricultural subsidies include direct cash payments, loans with no penalty, and payments from government insurance.
The U.S government subsidizes many elements of the transportation sector to assure the fast, efficient, reliable, and economical movement of people, commercial goods, and mail from one place to another.
Generally, government subsidies of critical business sectors have promoted profitability in many enterprises and assure a general national prosperity and domestic well-being.
Despite these positive benefits, critics have complained that subsidy gives unfair competitive advantages to some businesses.
With the dearth of telecommunication infrastructure in Nigeria and the need to quickly get telecommunication services to the nooks and crannies of Nigeria industry experts have opined that the move decision by NCC to initiate the WiN project is a welcome development.
One of those who identified the need for telecom intervention fund is the immediate past President of the Association of Telecommunication Companies of Nigeria, Mr. Titi Omo-Ettu. According to him, it is a good thing that subsidy already exists in the form of the Universal Service Provision Fund, (USPF).
He noted that this has helped in taking services to places which would ordinarily have taken some time before being reached.
According to research carried out by Streamz Media, a Nigerian telecom research firm, while the sector is currently recording impressive subscriber growth and also the introduction of increasing variety of services, further gains can be made if government can sustain subsidy for capacity expansion into underserved and unserved areas. It is also said that a change of the scope of coverage of current subsidy programmes would facilitate enhance benefits under the fund.
Mr. Lanre Ajayi, the President of ATCON, noted that USPF is already doing a lot in bringing access to many deprived communities, adding that this shows success in government-private sector subsidy programmes.
Omo-Ettu, however, added that there is an urgent need to change the workings of USPF to deliver further benefits to Nigerians. According to him, the definition of some areas as unserved and underserved must be changed to promote increasing service usage in the country.
“The existence of telephone service in an area does not mean that it is not underserved. Under the current definition, we cannot use USPF for certain class of projects in Lagos because the state does not fall under underserved areas. But if you take the University of Lagos where there are over 30,000 students, you see that we can put extensive fibre on the school and promote use of telecommunication in more innovative and cost-effective ways. This can be done under USPF.”
Omo-Ettu noted that the need to provide such a service has been realized by Google, the world’s leading Internet Company, which is currently working at putting fibre in a number of Nigerian universities.
He added that the fact that Google is trying to do it shows that there is some form of value in embarking on such subsidized projects. Omo-Ettu advised that government should see the move by Google as a challenge for it to do more in facilitating similar projects.
Another aspect of subsidy that was identified is in the area of taking services beyond basic voice and facilitating access to the most recent technologies.
Mr. Olusola Teniola, the Chief Operating Officer of Phase3 Telecom, noted that while millions of Nigerians now have mobile phones, the shift in telecommunications development must be towards actual number of citizens that have access to broadband services.
He noted that while the country had achieved a lot in bringing basic services to people, adding that the move now must be towards delivering broadband services.
Teniola called for greater support of USPF in order for the fund to succeed and deliver further gains to Nigerians especially in the backdrop of its potential.
According to him, subsidy in telecommunications is different from what obtains in the power and transportation sectors.
“The Nigerian Communications Commission has done a great job by helping to set up the USPF. In the coming days and years, we must all support the fund to record greater success to Nigerians,” he stated.
Mr. Austin Egbunike, chief executive officer of CANE Digital Services, said while USPF is helping to support in infrastructure sharing, if government had helped in providing facilities right from the onset, operators would just utilize for their base transceiver stations and the distress suffered by CDMA operators could have been averted. He noted that subsidy is a necessity in every liberalised economy
.
He said: “Every economy, almost all over world, has some form of subsidy programme. In the Nigerian aviation industry, we see an obvious need and the recent events have further exposed this need. In the United States, the intervention of government in General Motors is what prevented the firm from going under during the global financial meltdown.
“While the telecommunications industry may be doing well today, we must not be fooled into thinking that all is well in every aspect of the industry. If USPF were not set up with the aim of providing finance for the project expansion, many places that have services today would remain unconnected.”
Egbunike added that it is commendable that in the power sector government had also realized the need for some form of subsidy. He however warned that it should not be looked at in the same way as the fuel subsidy which has been badly managed. He commended the new steps taken by USPF management to facilitate infrastructure sharing and construction of new ones, noting that it showed that the NCC was on top of its game in the sector.
General News
PayPal Goes Live in Nigeria Through Paga
Paga, Nigeria’s pioneering fintech company, and global payments leader PayPal have launched live account linking for Nigerian users, unlocking seamless cross-border payments and local Naira access after years of limited service.
The integration allows Nigerians to directly connect PayPal accounts to Paga wallets, receive funds from PayPal’s vast network spanning over 200 markets and 436 million active users, shop with international merchants, and withdraw balances for everyday needs like bill payments, bank transfers, or Visa card spending.
This ends longstanding “send-only” restrictions, empowering freelancers, online sellers, and small businesses to earn globally and spend locally without cumbersome workarounds.
Nigerian merchants gain a competitive edge, tapping PayPal’s 400 million-plus customer base to accept payments in up to 25 currencies, with funds settling swiftly via Paga’s nationwide infrastructure. Currency conversions occur at market-driven willing-buyer-willing-seller rates, positioning the service against informal channels and crypto alternatives. Paga’s upcoming merchant gateway enhancements will support larger business transactions directly.
Paga Founder and Group CEO Tayo Oviosu described the rollout as transformative: “Whether you’re a freelancer receiving international payments, a business selling online, or a consumer shopping globally, this collaboration makes it easier to access and use global funds locally, in a way that’s simple, secure, and built for our markets.” PayPal’s Senior Vice President for Middle East and Africa, Otto Williams, added: “We’ve been intentional about partnering with local innovators like Paga… to expand financial inclusion and enable more consumers and businesses to participate confidently in the digital economy.”
The move bolsters Nigeria’s explosive digital payments sector, where 2023 transaction values hit ₦657.8 trillion ($730.9 billion)—averaging ₦54 trillion monthly—and active mobile wallet users exceed 30 million. Backed by Central Bank of Nigeria reforms like IMTO guidelines and fraud protections, it taps a $25 billion annual remittance flow and projects an $18.3 billion digital economy by year-end.
Paga, with over 21 million users, CBN nationwide licensing, and a $250 million valuation, serves as the ideal partner through its API ecosystem and settlement network. To start, users log into the Paga app or site, link their PayPal account (personal or business via individual Paga setup), and begin transacting instantly.
This partnership not only bridges global finance to local realities but also accelerates Nigeria’s fintech dominance, fostering SME growth and diaspora remittances in Africa’s largest economy.
General News
Facebook Powers Connection, Creativity at African Creators Summit 2026

Facebook will be live at the 2026 African Creators Summit, delivering immersive on-ground experiences designed to connect with and empower Africa’s growing creator ecosystem. The summit will take place on Thursday, January 29, 2026, at the Federal Palace Hotel, Victoria Island, Lagos.

The African Creators Summit (ACS) is one of Africa’s leading gatherings for creators, storytellers, innovators and digital entrepreneurs. This year’s summ]it theme, ‘Building a Sustainable Ecosystem Where Africa Trades Its Swag’, aligns with Facebook’s focus to empowering creators with tools that support monetisation, audience reach, discovery and community building.
“We are dedicated to empowering creators in the communities they’re already active in so they can succeed and grow on Facebook while sharing original and engaging content,” said Oluwasola Obagbemi, Head of Communications, Sub-Saharan Africa at Meta. “Events like the African Creators Summit, which bring together creators, storytellers and innovators, provide a platform to demonstrate that Facebook is all about connecting people.
“We are excited to showcase the opportunities Facebook offers to reach a massive global audience, connect more deeply with real people and earn real money across all content formats.”
The event will bring together creators, young adults and Nigerian celebrities to connect, collaborate and create memorable moments at the Facebook-themed booth. Attendees will engage in interactive experiences that highlight authentic connection, community-building and the power of real relationships on Facebook—reinforcing the platform’s role as the largest network for meaningful connections across Africa.
“Creators are the teachers and architects of modern culture. What they build today becomes the standard tomorrow — shaping how we dress, how we think and how we show up in the world.
“That is why we introduced the African Creators Summit: to create the bridge between creators, businesses, platforms, policymakers and partners across Africa, so we can truly understand each other and build together.
“Facebook’s continued support of ACS reflects a long-standing belief in creators — their stories, their businesses and their power to drive global impact from Africa.
“It’s a clear commitment to creativity as a catalyst for cultural influence and economic growth.” – Oladapo Adewunmi (Convener African Creators Summit)
Over the years, Facebook has evolved to meet changing needs by building strong experiences across Groups, Video and Marketplace. With the African Creators Summit positioned not just as an event but as a catalyst powering a diverse, inclusive and future-focused Pan-African creative ecosystem, Facebook continues to power creativity and connection across the creator community.
General News
Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital

By Blaise Udunze
Despite the fragile 2024 economy grappling with inflation, currency volatility, and weak growth, Nigeria’s banking industry was widely portrayed as successful and strong amid triumphal headlines. The figures appeared to signal strength, resilience, and superior management as the Tier-1 banks such as Access Bank, Zenith Bank, GTBank, UBA, and First Bank of Nigeria, collectively reported profits approaching, and in some cases exceeding, N1 trillion. Surprisingly, a year later, these same banks touted as sound and solid are locked in a frenetic race to the capital markets, issuing rights offers and public placements back-to-back to meet the Central Bank of Nigeria’s N500 billion recapitalisation thresholds.

The contradiction is glaring. If Nigeria’s biggest banks are so profitable, why are they unable to internally fund their new capital requirements? Why have no fewer than 27 banks tapped the capital market in quick succession despite repeated assurances of balance-sheet robustness? And more fundamentally, what do these record profits actually say about the real health of the banking system?
The recapitalisation directive announced by the CBN in 2024 was ambitious by design. Banks with international licences were required to raise minimum capital to N500 billion by March 2026, while national and regional banks faced lower but still substantial thresholds ranging from N200 billion to N50 billion, respectively. Looking at the policy, it was sold as a modern reform meant to make banks stronger, more resilient in tough times, and better able to support major long-term economic development. In theory, strong banks should welcome such reforms. In practice, the scramble that followed has exposed uncomfortable truths about the structure of bank profitability in Nigeria.
At the heart of the inconsistency is a fundamental misunderstanding often encouraged by the banks themselves between profits and capital. Unknown to many, profitability, no matter how impressive, does not automatically translate into regulatory capital. Primarily, the CBN’s recapitalisation framework actually focuses on money paid in by shareholders when buying shares, fresh equity injected by investors over retained earnings or profits that exist mainly on paper.
This distinction matters because much of the profit surge recorded in 2024 and early 2025 was neither cash-generative nor sustainably repeatable. A significant portion of those headline banks’ profits reported actually came from foreign exchange revaluation gains following the sharp fall of the naira after exchange-rate unification. The industry witnessed that banks’ holding dollar-denominated assets their books showed bigger numbers as their balance sheets swell in naira terms, creating enormous paper profits without a corresponding improvement in underlying operational strength. These gains inflated income statements but did little to strengthen core capital, especially after the CBN barred banks from using FX revaluation gains for dividends or routine operations. In effect, banks looked richer without becoming stronger.
Beyond FX effects, Nigerian banks have increasingly relied on non-interest income fees, charges, and transaction levies to drive profitability. While this model is lucrative, it does not necessarily deepen financial intermediation or expand productive lending. High profits built on customer charges rather than loan growth offer limited support for long-term balance-sheet expansion. They also leave banks vulnerable when macroeconomic conditions shift, as is now happening.
Indeed, the recapitalisation exercise coincides with a turning point in the monetary cycle. The extraordinary conditions that supported bank earnings in 2024 and 2025 are beginning to unwind. Analysts now warn that Nigerian banks are approaching earnings reset, as net interest margins the backbone of traditional banking profitability, come under sustained pressure.
Renaissance Capital, in a January note, projects that major banks including Zenith, GTCO, Access Holdings, and UBA will struggle to deliver earnings growth in 2026 comparable to recent performance.
In a real sense, the CBN is expected to lower interest rates by 400 to 500 basis points because inflation is slowing down, and this means that banks will earn less on loans and government bonds, but they may not be able to quickly lower the interest they pay on deposits or other debts. The cash reserve requirements are still elevated, which does not earn interest; banks can’t easily increase or expand lending investments to make up for lower returns. The implications are significant. Net interest margin, the difference between what banks earn on loans and investments and what they pay on deposits, is poised to contract. Deposit competition is intensifying as lenders fight to shore up liquidity ahead of recapitalisation deadlines, pushing up funding costs. At the same time, yields on treasury bills and bonds, long a safe and lucrative haven for banks are expected to soften in a lower-rate environment. The result is a narrowing profit cushion just as banks are being asked to carry far larger equity bases.
Compounding this challenge is the fading of FX revaluation windfalls. With the naira relatively more stable in early 2026, the non-cash gains that once flattered bank earnings have largely evaporated. What remains is the less glamorous reality of core banking operations: credit risk management, cost efficiency, and genuine loan growth in a sluggish economy. In this new environment, maintaining headline profits will be far harder, even before accounting for the dilutive impact of recapitalisation.
That dilution is another underappreciated consequence of the capital rush. Massive share issuances mean that even if banks manage to sustain absolute profit levels, earnings per share and return on equity are likely to decline. Zenith, Access, UBA, and others are dramatically increasing their share counts. The same earnings pie is now being divided among many more shareholders, making individual returns leaner than during the pre-recapitalisation boom. For investors, the optics of strong profits may soon give way to the reality of weaker per-share performance.
Yet banks have pressed ahead, not only out of regulatory necessity but also strategic calculation.
During this period of recapitalization, investors are interested in the stock market with optimism, especially about bank shares, as banks are raising fresh capital, and this makes it easier to attract investments. This has become a season for the management teams to seize the moment to raise funds at relatively attractive valuations, strengthen ownership positions, and position themselves for post-recapitalisation dominance. In several cases, major shareholders and insiders have increased their stakes, as projected in the media, signalling confidence in long-term prospects even as near-term returns face pressure.
There is also a broader structural ambition at play. Well-capitalised banks can take on larger single obligor exposures, finance infrastructure projects, expand regionally, and compete more credibly with pan-African and global peers. From this perspective, recapitalisation is not merely about compliance but about reshaping the competitive hierarchy of Nigerian banking. What will be witnessed in the industry is that those who succeed will emerge larger, fewer, and more powerful. Those that fail will be forced into consolidation, retreat, or irrelevance.
For the wider economy, the outcome is ambiguous. Stronger banks with deeper capital buffers could improve systemic stability and enhance Nigeria’s ability to fund long-term development. The point is that while merging or consolidating banks may make them safer, it can also harm the market and the economy because it will reduce competition, let a few banks dominate, and encourage them to earn easy money from bonds and fees instead of funding real businesses. The truth be told, injecting more capital into the banks without complementary reforms in credit infrastructure, risk-sharing mechanisms, and fiscal discipline, isn’t enough as the aforementioned reforms are also needed.
The rush as exposed in this period, is that the moment Nigerian banks started raising new capital, the glaring reality behind their reported profits became clearer, that profits weren’t purely from good management, while the financial industry is not as sound and strong as its headline figures. The fact that trillion-naira profit banks must return repeatedly to shareholders for fresh capital is not a sign of excess strength, but of structural imbalance.
With the deadline for banks to raise new capital coming soon, by 31 March 2026, the focus has shifted from just raising N500 billion. N200 billion or N50 billion to think about the future shape and quality of Nigeria’s financial industry, or what it will actually look like afterward. Will recapitalisation mark a turning point toward deeper intermediation, lower dependence on speculative gains, and stronger support for economic growth? Or will it simply reset the numbers while leaving underlying incentives unchanged?
The answer will define the next chapter of Nigerian banking long after the capital market roadshows have ended and the profit headlines have faded.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
News2 days agoAnambra Cuts Monday Pay to Kill Sit-at-Home
News2 days agoLIRS to Invoke NTAA to Recover Unpaid Taxes from Bank Accounts, Others
E-Financial2 days agoFirst Asset Management Receives Upgraded Ratings from Agusto &Co and DataPro
General News2 days agoNigeria Treats Religious Violence as Attack on State – NSA Ribadu
E-Financial2 days agoNIBSS, Others Flag 13,417 Nigerian Fraudsters on Person of Interest Portal
E-Financial2 days agoCBN Prepares Fresh Debit Card Rules to Improve ATM Services
News1 day agoTech Executives Double Down on AI, Talent and Adaptive Strategies to Lead in the Intelligence Age
General News1 day agoWEBINAR: Techeconomy Business Series Hosts Experts from MTN, Interswitch, BusinessPlus, others this Wednesday














