Connect with us

E-Financial

IFRS 15: The New Revenue Framework: What Corporates Need To Know

Published

on

IFRS.jpg
Kindly share this post

The financial reporting landscape will witness significant changes in 2018 as the two major standards on Revenue and Financial instruments (IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments) become effective.

For many reporting entities, the new revenue accounting principles is a paradigm shift that require care in implementation.

The investment community including auditors, regulators, financial analysts, financial reporters and the investing public at large need to be aware of the changes the new standard brings and its impact on the financial statements of reporting entities otherwise there may be a systemic wave of miscommunication, misinterpretation and analysis of company’s financial performance and position if the knowledge gap is not filled.

IFRS 15- Revenue from contracts with customers was issued on May 28, 2014 as a result of the joint effort of the International Accounting standard Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB)’s response to the concern in the investment community on the differences in accounting for similar revenue transactions using the different reporting framework.

Before the convergence of the revenue accounting, a huge deal of reconciliation effort went into attempting to make a meaningful comparison of financial information for most multinational companies operating in different jurisdictions and applying different GAAPs.

 Revenue is a crucial metric in performance reporting and there was need to achieve a level of comparability and enhance the quality and consistency of how it is being measured.

Notwithstanding the convergence that has been achieved in reporting revenues by the new standard, all reporting entities have to deal with managing the changes that results from the adoption of the new standard.

The changes have impacts on the nature of financial information that will be produced (in terms of disclosures, measurements, and presentations) and the processes, controls, systems that will generate the financial information.

One of the critical areas to highlight is the degree of managerial judgment that is required in complying with the standard. For instance, IFRS 15 requires companies to include in the measurement of revenue, variable considerations that it will be entitled to so far there will not be significant future reversals (constraining revenue).

A significant degree of judgment is required in determining the timing, the amount, the estimation method in arriving at the revenue to be recognized.

The principle of unbundling transactions to determine the performance obligations within each contract is another area where judgement is required.

Companies are now required to allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation provided on a relative standalone basis. There are a number of obligations within a contract that may not have a standalone transaction price or selling price or a comparable price for a similar transaction.

The application of the standard will requires a degree of judgment in the allocation process and the determination of revenue to be recognized.

In addition to the degree of judgements required in the application of the standard, there is the introduction of some new and unique assets lines in the balance sheet that will require accounting policies and process set up. The nature of these assets have to be carefully understood and interpreted.

IFRS 15: 91 requires the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer to be recognized as an asset if the entity expects to recover those costs. The incremental costs are costs incurred to obtain a contract with a customer that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained.

For instance, sales commissions can be capitalized as assets. This new class of assets need to be carefully understood and interpreted as they are subject to specific principles on amortization and impairments.

For SEC regulated entities with December reporting period, the first time adoption of IFRS 15 will be reported in their first quarter financial statements in March, corporates have to brace up for the decisions that need to be made especially in term of measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements of revenue transactions.

The new standard gives room for alternative approaches and options for transitioning and the impact of each transition approach has a huge impact on the financial information provided in those first set of accounts.

For instance a company that chooses to apply the full retrospective approach and no practical expedients will be required to assess the impact of the adoption of the new standard on revenue contracts that dates back to as far as possible and to adjust the impact of the changes in principles to financial statements presented for the affected periods while companies that choose the modified approach will only be required to adjust the effect of the adoption on the opening balances of their current reporting period with no restatement of the comparatives.

This invariably implies that the companies that choose to apply the retrospective approach without any practical expedient will present a minimum of three (3) statement of financial position on transition and will have more elaborate notes and disclosures than those who choose not to.

Although the financial results of the companies that choose to adopt the retrospective approach will show less volatility in the revenue profile overtime and will have more comparable results than those who do not.

Although IFRS 15 gives room for judgments and subjectivity, the standard, however, requires companies to make more elaborate disclosures than the existing guidance. Companies will be required to provide both qualitative and quantitative information about its contracts with customers, the significant judgements, and changes in the judgements made in applying [IFRS 15] to those contracts and any assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfil a contract with a customer in accordance with [IFRS 15:91] in addition to other more elaborate requirements on disclosures that explain the impact that new accounting standards are expected to have on an entity’s financial statements .

This will aid the understanding of the financial statement impact of the adoption of the new revenue standard.

The investment community needs to continue to re-orientate itself to understand the intricacies and peculiarities of the application of the new revenue standard; it is quite obvious that areas that will potentially require more attention will be the application of judgement and the use of significant model estimates, the peculiarities of the new assets lines created and for first time reporters, the impact of transition decisions on trend analysis.

The post IFRS 15: The new revenue framework – What corporates need to know appeared first on Deloitte Nigeria Blog.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

E-Financial

Zenith Bank Gets Regulatory Approval for Full Takeover of Paramount Bank

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Zenith Bank, Nigeria’s second biggest lender by market value, has received approval from the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) to acquire 100 percent of Paramount Bank Limited, clearing a key regulatory hurdle in its East African expansion drive.

In a statement on Thursday, CAK said the transaction is “unlikely to lead to a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the market for the provision of banking services in Kenya” and would strengthen Paramount’s financial position, helping it meet enhanced core capital requirements over the long term.

The Kenyan regulator noted that the deal poses no risk of reduced competition in the country’s banking sector. Zenith currently has no banking operations in Kenya, while Paramount is a Tier III lender with a modest 0.2 percent market share.

“The approval is based on the Authority’s determination that the transaction is unlikely to harm competition, while any negative public interest concerns regarding employment can be addressed through mitigating remedies,” CAK added.

Paramount met the Central Bank of Kenya’s KSh3.0 billion core capital requirement in November last year, reporting KSh3.118 billion after raising KSh332 million from shareholders, according to Mwango Capital, a Nairobi-based research firm.

The deal reflects a broader shift among banks in East Africa’s largest economy as lenders seek growth opportunities beyond increasingly saturated home markets marked by weak credit expansion, rising regulatory costs, and intense competition.

While several global banks — including Standard Chartered and HSBC — have scaled back African operations over the past decade, Zenith’s move signals confidence in selective regional expansion, particularly in East Africa, where economic growth and financial inclusion trends remain supportive.

The banking group is also widening its continental footprint. Last month, the lender disclosed plans to expand into Ethiopia, Africa’s second most populous country, as it targets generating up to half of its profits outside Nigeria over the medium term.

Historically, Nigeria, the continent most populous nation contributed as much as 90 percent of the bank’s earnings, a dominance that is now gradually easing.

Data cited by The Africa Report show that profit contributions from foreign subsidiaries rose to 27 percent in the first nine months of 2025, up from 14 percent in 2024.

Nigeria’s banking recapitalisation drive is also pushing large lenders such as Zenith to deploy capital beyond their home market. In January 2025, Zenith — which holds an international banking licence — raised N350.4 billion ($242 million), lifting its paid-up capital to N614.6 billion ($425 million).

With higher capital buffers in place, banks are reassessing how best to deploy fresh funds as domestic earnings normalise following two years of windfall gains.

As part of the approval, Zenith has been required to retain Paramount’s 78 employees for at least 12 months after the transaction is completed.

The bank is listed on the Nigerian and London stock exchanges and operates across corporate, commercial, retail, and investment banking. Its international subsidiaries span the United Kingdom, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Gambia, the UAE, and China.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Court Jails Ogiemwonyi, Stockbroker for Theft of $80,000, N953m Shares Proceeds

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Victor Ogiemwonyi, a Lagos stockbroker, and Partnership Securities Limited, his company, have been convicted for allegedly stealing shares worth N953 million and $80,000 belonging to one Mr. Arnold Onyekwere Ekpe, a former managing director of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI).

Court Jails Ogiemwonyi, Stockbroker for Theft of $80,000, N953m Shares Proceeds

Ogiemwonyi was convicted after he was found guilty of two-count charges bordering on stealing, contrary to Section 285(1), (9) (b) and (c) of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2011 slammed on him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Ekpe, through Messrs Margaret Onyema, his counsel, has sometimes in October 2016 in a petition to the EFCC alleged that he instructed the defendants to sell his 96,077,872 units of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI) shares, which were sold at the rate of N1,296,885,311.02.

But he said out of the proceeds of the sale, the stock broker paid only N300,000,000.00 to him while he dishonestly diverted the balance for personal use.

Following investigations, the defendants were charged with two counts of stealing.

Count one reads:

”Victor Ogiemwonyi and Partnership Securities Limited between the months of June, 2016 and September, 2016 at Lagos within the jurisdiction of this honourable court dishonestly stole the sum of N953, 535,861.57 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Three Million, Five Hundred and Thirty Five Thousand, Eight Hundred and Sixty one Naira Fifty Seven Kobo) being part of the proceeds of sale of 96, 077, 872 Ecobank Transnational Incorporated Shares, property of Mr. Arnold Onyekwere Ekpe”.

Count Two reads:

“Victor Qgiemwonyi and Partnership Securities Limited sometime between June, 2016 and July, 2016 at Lagos within the jurisdiction of this honourable court dishonestly stole the sum of USD$80,000.00 (Eighty Thousand United States of America Dollars) which formed part of the accrued dividends on 96, 077,872 Ecobank Transnational incorporated Shares, property of Mr. Anold Onyekwere Ekpe”.

At trial, the prosecution, led by Ola Sesan, called five witnesses and tendered 67 exhibits, all of which were admitted and marked by the court.

The defence, on its part, called three witnesses, including the first defendant.

Delivering judgment on Wednesday, Justice Modupe Nicole-Clay of the Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos convicted Ogiemwonyi and his company, Partnership Securities Limited, guilty on all counts.

The court sentenced the first convict to pay a fine of N10 million, while the second convict was ordered to pay a fine of N20 million.

Also, the court directed the convicts to pay back the entire money stolen from the petitioner, both in naira and dollars.

Recall that Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, had in 2017 banned Victor Ogiemwonyi, from operating in the capital market for life over alleged unprofessional conduct in the Nigerian capital market.

He was also banned for life from holding directorship position in any public company in Nigeria.

He was also ordered to pay a penalty of N100,000.

SEC said Ogiemwonyi was banned after he was found guilty of breaching Rule 1(iii) of the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and Their Employees as contained in its Rules and Regulations made pursuant to the Investments and Securities Act 2007.

The ban also followed petition by EFCC to SEC accusing Ogiewonyi of misappropriation of about N1.24 billion, $80,000.00, stealing and dishonest conversion of proceeds of share sale belonging to an investor.

It was alleged that he used his company to dupe over 300 investors over N4.8 billion with Arnold Ekpe a former Managing Director of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated, ETI, being one of his victims.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

FCCPC Delists Non-Compliant Digital Lenders Post-January 5 Deadline

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has commenced enforcement actions against Digital Money Lending (DML) operators that failed to regularise their operations under the Digital, Electronic, Online and Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations, 2025 (DEON Regulations).

FCCPC Delists Non-Compliant Digital Lenders Post-January 5 Deadline

FCCPC

The commission withdrew the conditionally approved status of non-compliant DML firms and removed them from its official register of approved digital lenders, effective immediately after the January 5 compliance deadline.

FCCPC Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr Tunji Bello, announced the measures on Wednesday, emphasising their role in upholding regulatory standards and ensuring certainty in Nigeria’s digital lending sector.

Mr Bello stated that the compliance window provided under the DEON Regulations, which took effect on July 21, 2025, had closed, paving the way for fair, orderly and due process-driven enforcement.

He noted that the actions target persistent issues such as exploitative loan recovery tactics, data privacy breaches, harassment of borrowers and anti-competitive practices that have plagued the sector.

The DEON Regulations, issued on September 3, 2025, under the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, mandate all non-bank digital lenders to register, adhere to fair interest rates, ethical debt recovery and robust data protection measures.

Non-compliance now attracts severe penalties, including fines up to N100 million or one per cent of annual turnover, operational restrictions, app store delistings and potential director disqualifications for up to five years.

As of late 2025, the FCCPC had granted full approval to 438 digital lending companies, with recent data indicating over 521 firms now under regulatory scrutiny post-deadline.

The commission’s phased crackdown involves collaboration with the Central Bank of Nigeria, Google and Apple for account freezes and global app removals targeting unregistered platforms.

Industry watchers described the enforcement as a landmark move to sanitise Nigeria’s fast-expanding digital credit market, which has seen rising borrower complaints despite earlier 2022 interim guidelines.

The FCCPC reiterated its commitment to balancing innovation with consumer protection, urging affected operators to swiftly meet requirements for reinstatement.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending