General News
Over 50% of African Countries do not have National Privacy Legislation – Jean-Francois

Jean-Francois’s career in ICT spans 20 years mostly in international roles with a focus on public policies and regulatory affairs.
Before joining GSMA as Policy Director for Sub-Saharan Africa in November 2017, Jean-Francois was Regulatory Affairs Director for Africa at Millicom supporting all its Tigo operations across the continentsince 2015.
He shares his thoughts with UgoOnwuaso on the data protection laws in Africa and a whole lot on issues affecting national privacy legislations
You were in Mauritius recently for the Data protection summit; could you tell us the relevance of this summit viz-a-viz absence of data protection law in some African countries?
I think that a fair majority of the African population are concerned that more than 50% of African countries do not have national privacy legislation in place. We are witnessing several governments from around the continent rallying to put such legislation in place with Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania and Rwanda either amending or seeking to implement the much needed legislation. We foresee a trend over the next 12 months whereby more African governments will follow suit as data protection laws play a vital role in the safety and security of our continent.
This is important because cross border data flow internationally has a direct impact on GDP growth. Furthermore, Africa’s digital future will depend on countries that are taking action in order to avoid any violations in data protection laws that could hinder trade or innovation.
About cross border data flow, what arethe challenges of cross border data transfer?
Cross border data transfer has some inherent challenges including the lack of uniform standards and legislationspertaining to protection. Consent would also need to be sought by the person sending the data so that it can be utilized as intended andthe same levels of data protection applied in the countries in question.
This is wherelegal provisionsthat ensure uniform level of protection to the consumerwhen data is transferred within and outside of the country come into play. Regional frameworks are useful for this, and ECOWAS for example, has a supplementary act on data protectionfor this type of transaction.
Could you explain the role of data protection in facilitating the African Single Digit Market?
Data protection is vital in facilitating the African Single Digital Market.If the objective is to have services addressing a variety of African markets at the same time, one needs to make sure that digital services are able to share data across borders.Cross border data costs are really critical to establish the African single digital market and that is where the importance of data protection comes into play.
Looking at GDPR, how would you assess African data protection landscape in view of implementations of European Union Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)?
I believethat the focus on protection and privacy legislation today in Africa is thanks to the external push that we’ve seen through the enforcement and enactment of GDPR. It’s important for African countries to take what is good from GDPR and also pass a solution that’s robust enough to work intheir realities.
Today what’s interesting with the enforcement and enactment of GDPR is that a lot of African governments realize they need to close the gap; equip themselves with national legislation if they haven’t done so and strike a balance between the burdens put on SMEs to register with personal dataregistrars. This iscompared tothe industryapproach being enforced by theGDPR sothat if a data breach occurs, companies are able to document the level of protection they had in place.
There are also other regional frameworks that are interesting, such as the Asian circular framework which supports cross border privacy rules to enable uniform level of protection in the regions that have privacy legislation in place. There are different models and it’s important for Africa to identify and utilize what is relevant.
Is Africa ripe for continental data protection regulation?
I will defer the question to you as a Nigerian citizen and consumer, are you ready to have your personal data protected? I’m sure your answer will be yes. I imagine the judiciary has embarked on a project to pass a national legislation on data protection. I think it’s in the interest of consumers, businesses, companies, and individuals. Mobile network operators are also keen to have clear rules to abide by.The worst thing that can happen for businesses is when the rules of the game are not clear, orthere is a legal vacuum.So, I think there is a call for the adoption ofgood, smart national privacy legislation and options to make sure that data can flow and fuel the digital economy.
Today there’s a mobile economy in sub-Saharan Africa made up of 440 million unique mobile subscribers. This is larger than $10 billion in terms of economic value last year and its 7.1% of sub-Sahara Africa’s GDP.
The mobile and digital economies haveanopportunity to play a strong role in our region. Internet subscribers have quadrupled in the region since 2010so mobile is really transforming lives in an increasingly connected world.
Looking more specifically at what it means for the data economy, and international data flows have increased the global GDP by 10% and if we consider their contribution to a new global GDP which is expected to be around 2.8 Trillion, it’s a larger share than the global trade in goods.
Coming back to your question about the African single market, its digital dimension has a high probability to groweven quicker than the physical goods component which has been historically low in Africa.
You talked about data privacy, what should we do in order to create data management framework that will protect citizen’s privacy?
On one hand, we havethe legislation and the regulatory framework but another important factor is the actual data management and how companies go about it.
I will go back to the Asian model I was referring to earlier. The cross border privacy rule is a model or approach where companies can commit to each other, even though there is no national legislation on what level of protection they will give to data protection.The data management framework which you’re referring to, can be set up in the private sector in practical ways.
I think it’s also important for governments and we usually insist that the rules of data protection are the same for private businesses and government alike. This is because we see in some legislative projects different sets of obligations applicable to private and public sectors. Itneeds to be a cross cutting, andoverarching approachwith rules applicable to both because I forecast that data management frameworks will have to talk to each other.
What are some of the adverse effects, if Africa does not create a strong data protection landscape?
Absence of a conducive and smart data privacy law implemented ora protectionframework will hinder trade and innovation. Mobile and digital technology presents a lot of opportunity for growth across the African continent. It is providing a platform for innovation, creating new companies, new services and providing employment opportunities.So in order to be able to join the fourth industrial revolution data protection needs to become a reality.Furthermore, we need to be able to leverage the economic power with reference to data growth.Regulating people’s informationwith a patchwork of geographically born privacy laws will only restrict how African companies can innovate and bring better products and services to consumers in the future.
It’s an important time for all countries to take actions to bridge the differences in their privacy regulations if any, and to acknowledge the fact that a regional approach is important in the process to equip themselves with national legislation. So embracing the existing regional privacy framework is very important and working towards a Pan African approach to data privacy is critical to protecting the rights of individuals and unlocking their economic potential.
Where do you see Africa in the next few years with regards to data privacy policies?
I wish to see all African countries havingtheir data privacylegislationsenforcedand I’m confident that we will see in the very near future, a significant number of African countries passing privacy legislations.
There is a need to update data frameworks, as some of them have remained in use for over 10 years.
Regional economic communities will also have an opportunity to review those frameworks and provide a new template for the remaining countries to adopt national legislation.
There is anongoing discussion around which level of data localization should be implemented and the value of cross border data flows. I think it’s easier for neighboring countries to recognize the value of those cross border data flows, so ECOWAS started it and we hope that in otherAfrican countries where no regional framework has been adopted yet, one will be put into place soon.
The question has also been raised as to the slow pace of signatories joining the African Union core convention on cyber security and professional data protection.Whether International public law instruments are the right solution because of the heavy processfor adoption, what opportunities exist for more modern legislations orfast law approaches to supplement at aPan- African level and what can be done to speed up the process?The right answers to these questions canbe explored by the network of African data protection authorities and these answers couldshape discussions moving forward.
In Nigeria, there is a litany of information silos here and there, they not harmonized. How can all of these data sets be harmonized and protected?
I think you are referring to data collected by multiple agencies. The general challenge in data protection and privacy is that when you interconnect different data sets, the rule that’s applicable to one data set is sometimes not sufficient to guarantee the interconnection of a variety of data sets. Therefore, for data sets to be combined, it’s important to review the situation for the data subject – the owners of the personal data – and it’s important that they are aware,so that there will be a more general approach to the pursuit. This is why those principles need to be enshrined in national legislation.
General News
Airtel Africa Foundation Calls for Applications for “DigiLeap” Tech Training for Young Women

The Airtel Africa Foundation, through Airtel Nigeria, has officially opened the application portal for the DigiLeap Tech Drive, a core initiative in the Foundation’s digital inclusion agenda. The application portal will be open until 8th May 2026.

Targeting 200 underserved young women in the Ikorodu Local Government Area of Lagos State, the programme is designed to bridge the gender divide in the digital economy by providing intensive, industry-standard technical and digital literacy training at no cost to the beneficiaries.
The DigiLeap Tech Drive is a strategic collaboration between the Airtel Africa Foundation, the ISHK Tolaram Foundation, and Co-Creation Hub (CcHub), with implementation carried out by the SAIL Innovation Lab, a leading centre for digital talent development in Nigeria.
Strategically engineered to transform high-potential individuals into workforce-ready professionals, this high-impact project will provide technical instruction, mentorship, and job-placement linkages, directly tackling regional unemployment and the systemic underrepresentation of women in the global technology sector.
Commenting on the project, Dr Segun Ogunsanya, Chairman of the Airtel Africa Foundation, emphasised that the partnership between the Foundation, Ishk Tolaram, and CcHub is central to the Foundation’s holistic mission of advancing both digital and gender inclusion across the continent.
“Our mission at the Airtel Africa Foundation is to accelerate digital inclusion across the continent,” he said. “By bringing the DigiLeap Tech Drive to the women of Ikorodu alongside Ishk Tolaram and CcHub, we are providing 200 young women with a definitive competitive advantage in the modern economy. This initiative ensures the digital revolution is truly inclusive; it isn’t merely a training session, but a professional pipeline designed to transition these women directly into internships and sustainable careers.”
In his remarks on the flag-off, Dinesh Balsingh, Chief Executive Officer, Airtel Nigeria, highlighted Airtel’s dedication to ensuring that women are integrated into the country’s rapidly evolving digital economy.
“At Airtel Nigeria, we believe that empowering women with digital skills is a fundamental catalyst for national economic growth. With the DigiLeap tech training, we are creating a sustainable pathway for young women in underserved communities to move from the sidelines of the digital economy into the heart of the tech workforce. This initiative reflects our deep-rooted commitment to social impact and our belief that when women lead in technology, entire communities thrive,” he said.
Focusing on industry-standard competencies that enhance both employability and entrepreneurship readiness, application entry into the programme is now live and open to women aged 18–35 living in Ikorodu.
General News
Cross River State Isolates 10 More Persons with COVID Symptoms

Cross River State Government said it has identified and isolated 10 persons who interacted with a Chinese national who reimported COVID-19 into Nigeria.

Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) while confirming a case of COVID-19 in the state, assured the public that there is no evidence of widespread transmission.
But, Dr. Inyang Ekpenyong, state epidemiologist, disclosed that the individuals were traced through contact tracing after interacting with the index case (Chinese national) and have since been placed under movement restriction.
“We’ve restricted their movements to their homes, so that they do not spread the symptoms to other persons,” Ekpenyong said, noting that the contacts were under close monitoring by health officials.
She added that surveillance teams had visited the expatriate’s workplace in Akamkpa to track possible exposure and prevent further transmission.
The affected Chinese national is currently receiving treatment at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), where authorities said he was responding positively.
Ekpenyong reminded residents that COVID-19, despite first emerging about six years ago, has not been eradicated, urging continued adherence to preventive measures.
She advised the public to maintain regular hand sanitisation, use face masks where necessary, and follow public health guidelines issued by experts.
But, Dr. Jide Idris, director general, NCDC, said, “Public health surveillance systems remain active nationwide, and we are working closely with state authorities to ensure early detection and swift response to any case.”
In a statement on Wednesday, Dr. Idris, said there is no cause for alarm, adding that “We are monitoring the situation closely and our response systems are active and working,”.
Earlier, Dr. Henry Egbe Ayuk, state commissioner for Health, confirmed the first case and assured residents that all necessary containment protocols had been activated.
According to Ayuk, the index case involves a 53-year-old Chinese national who arrived in Nigeria on March 17 and later developed symptoms while in Akamkpa.
He explained that the patient’s condition worsened while receiving treatment at a state facility before he was transferred to UCTH for advanced care.
“At the facility, samples were taken in line with established protocols, and it was confirmed that the patient showed symptoms of COVID-19,” Ayuk said.
“We are, however, happy to report that he is doing well,” he added.
The commissioner stressed that the state’s health system has been strengthened to respond effectively to outbreaks, with surveillance mechanisms fully operational across Cross River State.
He acknowledged the presence of occasional silent infections but maintained that the government remained prepared to manage any public health threat.
“But we are determined that for every ailment, every disease or outbreak, if it is identified here in the state, there should be no alarm. The state will do well in terms of surveillance or containment of an outbreak. Whatever it is, we will do our best to contain it. So, there is no alarm,” Ayuk stated.
Ayuk further noted that COVID-19 remains a global concern, warning that cross-border movement of infected individuals continues to pose risks.
“COVID-19 is not peculiar to Nigeria. But we’re determined to contain it. There’s no cause for alarm,” he said.
General News
The Visibility Trap

By Ememobong Udofot
There is a persistent assumption in modern business that attention is progress. If people are seeing you, engaging with you, and talking about you, then you must be growing. On the surface, this feels true. In practice, it is one of the most expensive misconceptions companies carry.

Visibility is not legitimacy. And confusing the two creates fragile businesses that look successful long before they actually are.
Visibility is distribution. It is how often you are seen, how far your message travels, and how loudly you exist in a market. It is driven by campaigns, partnerships, content, and media. It is measurable in impressions, reach, mentions, and recall.
Legitimacy is something else entirely. It is not what people see. It is what they conclude. It is the quiet but critical judgement a user makes when deciding whether to trust you with something that matters. Their money, their time, their reputation, their belief. Legitimacy is not declared. It is inferred. This is where most companies miscalculate.
A platform can be highly visible and still feel unsafe. It can be everywhere and still feel uncertain. It can dominate conversations and still fail at conversion when the moment of decision arrives. Because today, users are not asking, “Have I seen this before?” They are asking, “Do I trust what happens next?”
In financial services, especially in emerging markets, this distinction becomes sharper. Users do not operate from abundance. They operate from risk awareness. Every transaction is evaluated, consciously or not, through a lens of potential loss. What could go wrong? How fast can I recover if it does? Who is accountable if it fails? Visibility does not answer these questions. Legitimacy does.
Legitimacy is built through signals that reduce perceived risk. Not theoretical safety, but experienced reliability. It shows up in consistency of outcomes, in how predictable your system is under pressure, and in whether your platform behaves the same way every time, not just when everything is working but also when something breaks. It is reinforced by clarity. Users trust what they understand, not what is explained to them in long paragraphs, but what is immediately obvious in interaction. What happens next, how long it takes and what they can expect. It is strengthened by accountability. Not in policy documents, but in visible behaviour. How issues are handled, how quickly they are resolved, whether responsibility is assumed or deflected.
These are not branding elements in the traditional sense. They are operational realities. But this is exactly where branding is often misunderstood. Brand is not what you say about your product. It is the system of signals that shape how your product is perceived before, during, and after use. While visibility amplifies your presence, legitimacy sustains your relevance.
When companies prioritize visibility without building legitimacy, they create a dangerous gap between expectation and experience. Growth accelerates, but trust does not compound at the same rate. Eventually, the system corrects itself. Users withdraw, reputation weakens, and recovery becomes significantly harder than initial growth.
On the other hand, when legitimacy is established first, visibility becomes an accelerator rather than a risk. Every new user acquired enters a system that can hold them. Every interaction reinforces the same conclusion. This works; I can rely on this.
This is slower to build, but far more durable. The strategic implication is simple but rarely followed. Do not ask how to be seen more; ask what conclusions users are forming when they see you. Do not optimise for attention in isolation, optimise for the alignment between what is promised and what is experienced. Do not treat trust as a communication problem, treat it as a systems problem that communication must accurately represent. Because in the end, markets do not reward visibility. They reward reliability that has been observed, tested, and believed. And that is legitimacy.
Ememobong Udofot E. is a branding and communications executive specialising in strategy, systems thinking, and trust design within financial technology. She currently leads Branding and Communications at FlashChange, a digital value exchange platform focused on enabling reliable, efficient movement of digital assets.
General News3 days agoIshowSpeed’s African Tour was ‘Spy Job,’ for Elon Musk- Seun Kuti
Telecom3 days agoUniCloud Africa, Open Access Data Centres Announce Strategic Partnership to Strengthen Digital Sovereignty Across Africa
E-Financial3 days agoPolice Arraign First Bank Manager over Alleged Forex Fraud
General News2 days agoBreaking News…Hackers Allegedly Expose EFCC Data, Operatives’ Identities
E-Business2 days agoFCCPC Licenses 5 Firms for Airtime, Data Lending as Telcos Step Aside
E-Financial3 days agoPalmPay Hits 35m Users’ Milestone
General News3 days agoUS Library Blames Hackers for Viral Posts Urging Violence in Nigeria
News3 days agoKarex, World’s Top Condom Maker to Hike Prices due to Iran war













