Connect with us

E-Financial

TJI Says Nigeria Squanders $2.6Bn on Corporate Tax Incentives

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Tax Justice Network (TJN), a nongovernmental organization has said that Nigeria squandered some $2.6 billion on corporate tax incentives in one year, making the country to suffer a downgrade to 34th position on the 2020 Financial Secrecy Index.

TJI Says Nigeria Squanders $2.6Bn on Corporate Tax Incentives

In the TJN latest Financial Secrecy Index report, Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio sunk to 5.7 per cent, one of the lowest in the world, due largely “to poor regulatory compliance, weak institutions and a lack of transparency.”

Some studies, the report read, “indicate that corporate incentives are costly and inefficient. In a 2015 report, ActionAid found that Nigeria was losing up to 0.5 per cent of its GDP in corporate income tax incentives given to companies with pioneer status.

“Using the 2015 budget figure, the estimated losses were put at $2.6 billion per year.”

The Financial Secrecy Index, the report read, worsened when international oil companies engaged in oil exploration became the major drivers of foreign direct investment.

Quoting copiously from a report by ActionAid, the secrecy index report noted that Nigeria was “in 2014, advised that its proposed double taxation treaty with Mauritius would promote treaty shopping and tax evasion, yet the country has gone ahead and signed and ratified the treaty.

“Mauritius has also been signaled as one of the most aggressive tax treaty partners towards Africa.”

For treaties and agreements, the Tax Justice Network reported that in 2017, Nigeria signed the Common Reporting Standard Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement, which aims to facilitate the exchange of financial information among jurisdictions.

“With a view to implementing the OECD Guidance for Common Reporting Standard, the country’s Federal Inland Revenue Service released the Income Tax (Common Reporting Standard) Regulation in 2019.

“Under the regulation, reportable financial institutions are to carry out comprehensive due diligence on old and new accounts to identify ‘reportable accounts’ and to file information returnson an annual basis.

“Nigeria currently has double taxation agreements with 22 countries, including the UK, Netherlands, Canada, South Africa, China, Philippines, Pakistan, Romania, France, Belgium, Mauritius, South Korea, Sweden, Slovakia and Italy. Treaties with the United Arab Emirates, Kenya, Poland, South Korea, Singapore, Qatar, Spain, Cameroon and Ghana are not in force as they are yet to be ratified,” the report read.

Furthermore, the country currently has ratified double taxation agreements with 15 countries including Mauritius, which is popularly known as a corporate tax haven and a conduit for illicit financial flows from Africa,” the report added.

Rolling out the Nigeria’s secrecy profile, TJN said: “At independence in 1960, agriculture was the mainstay of Nigeria’s economy, accounting for up to 69 per cent of GDP. The oil boom in the 1970s ushered in a period where petroleum contributed up to 87 per cent of total exports.

“International oil companies engaged in oil exploration became the major drivers of foreign direct investment.

“The macro-economic policies put in place to attract such investment included import duty relief, accelerated depreciation and easy repatriation of profits.

“These incentives, coupled with additional tax avoidance practices, made illicit flows of funds to other secrecy jurisdictions easier.

In 2017, Nigeria scored 17 out of 100 on the Revenue Governance Index (RGI) and ranked 77th out of 89 countries in licensing transparency.

“However, in November 2019, the Nigerian government announced that it will unveil a Beneficial Ownership Register Portal for the oil and mining industry in January 2020 through the Nigerian Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative.

“In practice, littoral states demand personal income tax from the employers of offshore workers on some geographical basis. A possible problem with this is that an FPSO may spread across two or more states, with each state laying claim to taxing rights.”

This, it continued, uncertainty created an avenue for double taxation or under-assessment of tax.

Nigeria’s Financial System Strategy 2020 was launched by the Central Bank of Nigeria in 2006 to transform the financial sector. Part of its objective was to establish an international financial centre in Lekki, Lagos, to create a legal and financial framework linked to international jurisdictions.

“This remains to be implemented, however, and the government has focused on strengthening the integrity of the internal market and automation of payments in the banking sector,” the report read.

On investment incentives, the report states: “In 1992, the Nigerian Export Processing Zones

Authority was established by an enabling act. It gave the authority the power to manage export processing zones that can be established by an order of the president. Currently, there are 13 active free trade zones in Nigeria, with the Lekki Free Trade Zone being the most vibrant.

“The Nigerian Investment Promotion Council promotes investment activities and maintains a one-stop investment centre for registration and licensing of foreign direct investment. Incentives available to enterprises in the export processing zones include an exemption from federal, state or local taxes, levies and duties.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

E-Financial

IMF Raises Concerns over N8.83 Trillion Unreported Spending in Nigeria’s Budgets

Published

on

Kindly share this post

International Monetary Fund (IMF) has raised concerns over Nigeria’s fiscal transparency, disclosing that about two per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), estimated at N8.83 trillion, was omitted from recent official budget documents.

IMF Raises Concerns over N8.83 Trillion Unreported Spending in Nigeria’s Budgets

Bola Tinubu

Unreported public spending—also known as off-budget expenditure—happens when a government spends money on public projects or services without including those costs in official budget documents.

This practice hides the true size of the government’s deficit, hides debt accumulation, and distorts overall economic data.

The IMF said the unreported expenditure has created a significant gap between Nigeria’s reported fiscal deficit and its actual financing requirements, making government borrowing appear lower than it truly is.

Speaking at an industry event in Lagos, Christian Ebeke, resident representative of IMF in Nigeria,  said the expenditure should have been reflected in the country’s fiscal accounts to present a more accurate picture of public finances.

“So far we think that there are about two per cent of GDP of expenditure that were not reported that should be reported and should be recorded, so that this statistical discrepancy will disappear,” Ebeke said.

The estimate translates to approximately N8.83 trillion, based on the National Bureau of Statistics’ (NBS) latest nominal GDP figure of N441.5 trillion for 2025.

According to the NBS, Nigeria’s nominal GDP increased from N372.8 trillion in 2024 to N441.5 trillion in 2025 following improved performance across both the oil and non-oil sectors.

Using the Central Bank of Nigeria’s average exchange rate of N1,436 to the dollar for 2025, the omitted expenditure amounts to about $6.15 billion.

Ebeke attributed the discrepancy largely to capital projects executed outside the formal budget framework, noting that the omission had distorted assessments of Nigeria’s fiscal position and public investment profile.

He explained that some government spending was neither captured in approved budget documents nor reflected in budget implementation reports, resulting in an understatement of the country’s actual fiscal deficit.

According to him, the lack of comprehensive reporting also complicates coordination between fiscal and monetary authorities, as policymakers are left without a complete picture of government finances.

“The lack of full reporting can also complicate coordination between fiscal and monetary policy, as policymakers may not have a clear picture of the true deficit,” he said.

Ebeke warned that off-budget spending raises broader concerns about accountability, procurement processes and institutional oversight, stressing that improving fiscal transparency should remain a priority for the government.

“Improving transparency is critical,” he added, noting that expenditures outside the formal budget process undermine effective oversight and public accountability.

The IMF representative, however, acknowledged that the Federal Government has begun taking steps to address the problem through legislative reforms aimed at bringing previously unreported expenditures within the formal budget framework.

He said the authorities were working to amend existing budget laws to ensure greater disclosure of government spending but stressed that such reforms must be accompanied by timely and comprehensive budget implementation reports.

According to him, closing the reporting gap is essential to strengthening public financial management, improving transparency and restoring confidence in Nigeria’s fiscal framework.

The IMF’s latest observations come months after the National Bureau of Statistics rebased Nigeria’s economy, changing the GDP base year from 2010 to 2019, a revision that significantly increased the size of the country’s economy and, by implication, the value of expenditure estimates expressed as a percentage of GDP.

The concerns also follow the IMF’s recent Article IV Consultation on Nigeria, in which the Fund commended the Federal Government’s ongoing economic reforms for improving macroeconomic stability and boosting investor confidence, while cautioning that persistent structural weaknesses continue to limit the impact of the reforms on the broader population.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Visa Targets Nigeria, Others in Visa Pay Expansion Drive

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Visa is expanding access to Visa Pay for additional issuers across Africa through a software development kit (SDK) that enables banks, mobile money operators, and fintechs embed Visa Pay capabilities into their existing mobile applications and to launch virtual cards and payment experiences quickly and securely.

According to a statement from the company, the solution is an interoperable and secure way for banked and unbanked consumers to transact and move money across participating banks, fintechs and mobile networks.

Issuers adopting Visa Pay’s SDK span multiple markets across the continent including Ghana, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Comoros, Mauritius, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Tanzania, and Sierra Leone.

With integrated issuer processing capabilities, built-in customer experience, tokenisation readiness and Visa-certified security and compliance components, SDK helps accelerate and simplify the deployment of Visa Pay, particularly in markets where infrastructure constraints can slow digital transformation.

Looking ahead, Visa Pay will continue to evolve with new capabilities designed to further simplify everyday payments. Among the features expected to launch soon is Tap to Pay, which will enable consumers to make secure contactless payments by simply tapping their phone at a contactless-enabled checkout terminal, said the firm.

“Visa Pay is designed to help issuers meet a wide range of market needs, from secure e-commerce and remittances to mobile money-linked virtual cards, humanitarian disbursements, person-to-person payments and future contactless experiences,” said Godfrey Sullivan, senior vice president and head of products and solutions for Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa at Visa.

“The adoption of Visa Pay represents an important step in strengthening our digital payments capabilities and supporting our broader digital transformation agenda. At a time when Sudan’s current challenges have increased the need for resilient and accessible financial services, we believe digital payment solutions play a critical role in enhancing customer convenience, supporting business continuity, and promoting financial inclusion” commented Yousif Eltinay, CEO of United Capital Bank, Sudan.

According to Jesse Jackson, chief digital and innovation officer for Tanzania Commercial Bank, from a business perspective, Visa Pay will enable it accelerate digital adoption among both consumers and merchants, increase transaction activity within its ecosystem, expand merchant acceptance and strengthen customer engagement.

“It also supports our broader goal of driving financial inclusion by bringing more individuals and businesses into the digital economy.”

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

NDIC Warns Against Transactions with 46 Closed Microfinance Banks

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) has warned members of the public against carrying out any transactions with the 46 microfinance banks whose operating licences were revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

NDIC Warns Against Transactions with 46 Closed Microfinance Banks

NDIC

The corporation issued the warning on Thursday following the revocation of the licences by the CBN on July 1, 2026.

In a statement, the NDIC said it had been appointed the official liquidator of the failed banks pursuant to Section 12(2) of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 2020 and Sections 55(1) and 55(2) of the NDIC Act 2023.

It stated that the affected microfinance banks were no longer authorised to carry out banking business in Nigeria following the withdrawal of their licences.

The corporation cautioned members of the public against engaging in any unauthorised transactions with the closed banks or attempting to tamper with their assets and records.

It warned that any attempt by individuals to remove, conceal, retain or interfere with the assets, records or properties of the failed institutions would constitute a violation of the law and could attract appropriate legal sanctions.

According to the NDIC, it has commenced the process of an orderly closure of the banks through their immediate takeover, verification of depositors and payment of insured deposits to eligible customers.

The corporation assured depositors that the liquidation process would be conducted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

It added that depositors and the general public would be kept informed on further steps regarding the liquidation exercise, including the verification process and payment of insured sums to eligible depositors.

The NDIC urged customers of the affected banks to remain calm, assuring them of its commitment to protecting insured deposits and ensuring an orderly resolution of the failed financial institutions.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending