General News
Subscribers Privacy and Unsolicited SMS
Some weeks back Mr. Peter Igho, Director-General, National Lottery Regulatory Commission (NLRC) asked telecommunications operators to stop sending unsolicited text messages on their lottery promotions to subscribers. Though operators to large extent are heeding to this directive on promos but are consistently sending short message service (SMS) on other sundry issues such as urging subscribers to subscriber to one short code for daily motivational words as well as advertising products. Mobile phone spam is a form of spamming directed at the text messaging service of a mobile phone. It is described as mobile spamming, SMS spam, text spam or m-spam. As the popularity of mobile phones surged in the early 2000s, frequent users of text messaging began to see an increase in the number of unsolicited (and generally unwanted) commercial advertisements being sent to their telephones through text messaging. This can be particularly annoying for the recipient because, unlike in email, some recipients may be charged a fee for every message received, including spam. Mobile phone users often times queries how the organization or individual that generated such message got their mobile phone number, some often times accused their network operators of compromising on their privacy. However, network operators have argued that there are different ways through which such people gain access to such data as people fill forms for different purposes. But, as true this argument may be network operators’ staff could not be exonerated from conniving with those who generate these unsolicited mails to divulge data of subscribers. This writer sometime in December last year received an SMS from customer call centre of another network urging him to subscriber to its post paid package. The question that arises is how did the people that generated that message known that he is a post paid subscriber? Nigeria CommunicationsWeek had reported how some politicians were besieging SIM card registration centres in a bid to collate mobile phone numbers of subscribers in Lagos for campaign before last year elections. It is against this backdrop that the GSMA announced the publication of its Mobile Privacy Principles. The principles describe the way in which mobile consumers’ privacy should be respected and protected when consumers use mobile applications and services that access, use or collect their personal information. The principles are the result of close collaboration by leading mobile operators and input from other players in the wider mobile eco-system. The Mobile Privacy Principles will be used to develop more detailed guidelines and codes of conduct to address specific consumer concerns such as the use of private data or location details by applications. They pave the way for the development of clear and simple ways for customers to manage their information and their privacy on mobile phones. The key challenge is to find new mobile-friendly methods to help consumers make informed decisions about their privacy. One key principle relates to ‘transparency and notice’, which is about being open and honest with customers about what personal information is being collected and why. The principles also cover issues such as the need to provide consumers with control over how their personal information is used and by whom, and ensuring only a minimum amount of data for a given service is collected and that it is retained no longer than necessary. The GSMA is examining these issues in depth and reaching out to broader industry stakeholders to establish a broad consensus on how to ensure consumers’ privacy is treated more consistently across mobile applications and across platforms and services whilst continuing to support innovation. According to Tom Phillips, chief regulatory officer, GSMA, “The Mobile Privacy Principles are a significant first step but addressing mobile privacy is an ongoing challenge that requires the support and collaboration of the wider internet industry, civil society and regulators, working together, if we are to deliver real protection for consumers. This is a call to action to the broader industry.” Mobile phone spam is generally less pervasive than email spam, where in 2010 around 90% of email is spam. The amount of mobile spam varies widely from region to region. In North America, much less than 1% of SMS messages were spam in 2010, while in parts of Asia up to 30% of messages were spam. The lesser and geographically uneven prevalence of mobile phone spam is attributable to the higher cost (to spammers) of and technological barriers to sending mobile messages in some areas, and to law enforcement in others. Today, particularly in North America, most mobile phone spam is sent from mobile devices that have prepaid unlimited messaging rate plans. While the rate plans allow for unlimited messaging, in reality the relatively slow sending rate (on the order of magnitude of 1/s) limits the number of messages that may be sent before an abusing mobile is shut down. SMS spam is illegal under common law in most jurisdictions as trespass to chattels. Jurisdictions with specific SMS spam regulation and fines include Australia, the EU and others; in the US, violators face substantial costs; in a 2008 settlement, the violator agreed to pay $150 to each spam recipient. In a 2010 class action settlement of Satterfield v Simon & Schuster, a case that reached the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, plaintiffs agreed to pay $175 to each spam recipient. In response to Satterfield, entities who make money sending mobile phone spam formed the Mobile Advocacy Coalition (MAC) to lobby the government to legalize that activity. In the US, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expanded Phone Spam regulations to cover also Voice Spam—mostly in form of prerecorded telemarketing calls—commonly known as robocalls; victims can file a complaint with the FCC. However, in view of the policy of Sim card registration of subscribers, there should be legislation to protect such information from being compromised by operators or their agents.
General News
Interswitch Advocates Trust-Driven Infrastructure as Cornerstones of Africa’s Cross-Border Capital Future

Interswitch Group, one of Africa’s leading integrated payments and digital commerce companies, has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing a seamless and inclusive financial ecosystem across the continent at the recently concluded Inclusive Fintech Forum 2026, which held at the Kigali Convention Centre, in Rwanda from 10 -12 March 2026.

Speaking during a high-level session themed “Financial Centres & the Future of Cross-Border Capital” Akeem Lawal, Managing Director, Payments Processing & Switching (Interswitch Purepay), highlighted the critical factors shaping the next phase of financial integration across Africa.
He noted that while rapid advancements in digital technology have made it possible for capital to move across borders at unprecedented speed, the ultimate destination and impact of such capital flows are determined by trust, robust infrastructure, and strategic collaboration.
According to Lawal, as Africa’s economies continue to digitize and integrate, stakeholders must prioritize building resilient payment systems and fostering partnerships that enhance transparency, interoperability, and shared prosperity.
He emphasized that sustainable growth in cross-border financial flows will depend not only on technological innovation but also on the collective ability of institutions to inspire confidence and enable seamless transactions at scale.
Throughout the forum’s engagements, Interswitch, as one of Africa’s leading and pioneering digital technology enablers reiterated its long-standing vision of fostering a prosperous and interconnected Africa. The company continues to champion the development of a secure, technologically advanced digital payments ecosystem designed to connect and empower individuals, businesses, governments, and communities across the continent.
Participation at the Inclusive Fintech Forum underscores Interswitch’s strategic focus on driving thought leadership, strengthening regional collaboration, and supporting initiatives that accelerate financial inclusion and economic resilience.
As Africa navigates the evolving landscape of digital finance and cross-border commerce, Interswitch remains committed to delivering innovative solutions and partnerships that unlock opportunities for growth and shared value creation.
General News
FCCPC Launches Fuel Price Surveillance, Probes Airline Price Gouging, Resolves N10bn Complaints

In a robust move to shield consumers from opportunistic profiteering, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has rolled out comprehensive nationwide monitoring of fuel prices, zeroing in on petrol marketers amid escalating global hostilities between the United States, Israel, and Iran that threaten to jolt Nigeria’s volatile petroleum market.

FCCPC
Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Tunji Bello unveiled this proactive strategy during Thursday’s riveting March edition of the Meet the Press briefing at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, underscoring the profound, cascading implications of any petrol price uptick on everyday essentials from transportation to foodstuffs.
“We are presently monitoring the situation now, the effect of the US, Israeli, Iran war as it affects prices in Nigeria. Petrol has far-reaching effects on some of the things we eat or take daily,” Bello articulated, revealing the deployment of dedicated monitors empowered to interrogate stark pricing anomalies—such as when competitors slash rates by ₦100 or ₦200 per litre, yet outliers stubbornly hold at ₦1,100 to ₦1,500—and seamless collaboration with the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) to enforce accountability and deter exploitation.
Turning to the aviation sector, Bello disclosed that FCCPC’s exhaustive probe into yuletide price gouging has pinpointed five to six domestic airlines for collusion, inflating fares from a baseline of ₦145,000-₦150,000 to exorbitant ₦500,000-₦700,000 during the Christmas rush.
“We investigated the airlines during the Christmas period because what we found was that they colluded to fix prices at that time,” he affirmed, confirming the issuance of an investigative report with stern penalties in the offing and directives for refunds of exploited excesses to aggrieved passengers. While withholding names pending finalisation, Bello signalled imminent public disclosure to restore market fairness.
Consumer grievances span critical sectors, with energy topping the list—electricity users railing against persistent metering deficits, inflated estimated billing, and unreliable Band A tariffs promising up to 20 hours daily yet delivering far less—prompting FCCPC to rigorously enforce service-tariff proportionality on distribution companies.
Fintech woes, particularly in online transactions and predatory loan apps, alongside telecom billing disputes, also proliferate, reflecting Nigeria’s deepening digital economy pains.
Bello highlighted FCCPC’s stellar track record, resolving over 9,000 complaints between March and August 2025 and clawing back more than ₦10 billion for victims. “Nigerians sometimes grumble more than they complain. Once you complain, the system generates a code for the complaint, and we can begin to act on it,” he urged, championing formal channels for swift intervention.
The Commission recommitted to dynamic partnerships with consumers, trade associations, and sister regulators, fortifying defences against anti-competitive conduct and embedding consumer rights as the bedrock of Nigeria’s evolving market ecosystem.
This multi-pronged offensive arrives at a pivotal juncture, as geopolitical flux and domestic inflation test regulatory mettle.
General News
Court Freezes Bank Accounts of Petrocam, Founder over Alleged N9Bn Zenith Bank Debt

Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has ordered the freezing of bank accounts belonging to Petrocam Trading Nigeria Limited and Patrick Ilo, its founder, over an alleged N9.05 billion debt.

Patrick Ilo and Petrocam Filling station
Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the court granted the interim orders in Suit No: FHC/L/CS/393/2026 which was an ex parte application filed by Zenith Bank to preserve funds allegedly owed by the defendants as of May 31, 2025.
It was gathered that the ex parte motion was argued by Chief A.A. Aribisala (SAN) on behalf of Zenith Bank.
While delivering the ruling on Wednesday, the court restrained the defendants, whether acting by themselves or through agents, privies, or assigns, from withdrawing, transferring, dissipating, or otherwise dealing with funds up to the sum of ₦9,057,511,855.63, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice.
“An interim order is hereby granted restraining the defendants/respondents, Petrocam Trading Nigeria Limited and Patrick Ilo, whether by themselves, their agents, privies or assigns, from withdrawing, transferring, dissipating or otherwise dealing with any funds up to the sum of ₦9,057,511,855.63 pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice,” Justice Aneke ruled.
The court further ordered the freezing of all accounts linked to Bank Verification Number (BVN) 22141926401, which the bank alleged is being used by Ilo to operate Petrocam’s accounts.
In addition, Justice Aneke directed all financial institutions within the jurisdiction of the court to immediately place a lien or “Post-No-Debit” restriction on all accounts associated with the BVN.
According to the order, “All financial institutions within the jurisdiction of this honourable court are hereby directed to place a lien or post-no-debit restriction on all accounts linked to BVN 22141926401 pending further orders of the court.”
The order extends beyond traditional banks to key operators within Nigeria’s electronic payment ecosystem. Among those joined as respondents in the matter are the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System, Interswitch Limited, and Interswitch Financial Inclusion Services Limited.
The court also directed the institutions to disclose the details of all accounts linked to the BVN. Justice Aneke ordered the respondents to file an affidavit of return within seven days, revealing all accounts connected to the BVN, their balances, and the transaction history covering the preceding six months.
Court documents filed in support of the application showed that the credit facility at the centre of the dispute was subject to several pre-disbursement conditions imposed by Zenith Bank.
According to the filings, Petrocam was required to formally accept the facility through its authorised signatories, provide a board resolution approving the loan, and disclose any existing indebtedness to other lenders, including facility limits, outstanding balances, and collateral pledged.
Other conditions included the domiciliation of sales proceeds and Sovereign Debt Note subsidy payments from Oando Plc and Total Nigeria Plc into Petrocam’s account with Zenith Bank.
The company was also required to submit relevant contract agreements for the bank’s approval and provide a five percent counterpart contribution for each transaction, while all required security documentation had to be executed before the facility could be disbursed.
The bank further stated that Petrocam was expected to submit quarterly management accounts within 60 days after the end of each quarter and audited annual financial statements within 120 days.
In addition, Petrocam was required to route all import duty payments and Letters of Credit through its account with Zenith Bank, establish Letters of Credit for petroleum imports, and obtain comprehensive marine insurance naming Zenith Bank as the first loss payee.
Court filings also revealed that General Marine and Oil Services Ltd had been appointed by the bank to monitor petroleum product warehousing at Petrocam’s expense.
The facility agreement further imposed foreign exchange obligations, authorising Zenith Bank to settle maturing Usance obligations at 12 percent interest if Petrocam failed to provide the necessary funds.
The bank maintained that in the event of default, Petrocam would be responsible for all legal, recovery, and ancillary costs arising from enforcement of the facility.
The court also granted Zenith Bank leave to serve the defendants through substituted means.
Justice Aneke ruled that the defendants may be served at their last known address in Victoria Island, Lagos.
The matter has been adjourned to March 17, 2026, for mention.
General News3 days agoInterswitch Advocates Trust-Driven Infrastructure as Cornerstones of Africa’s Cross-Border Capital Future
News3 days agoNLNG Advances Media Excellence with Change Your Story Workshop
E-Financial3 days agoCBN Orders Banks to Restrict Access to Banking Services for Loan Defaulters
E-Business3 days agoWhy JustMarkets Is a Strong Choice for Gold Trading
E-Financial3 days agoUBA Business Series Celebrates ‘Gen.W: The Evolved Woman’ in Push for Female Empowerment
Telecom2 days agoVDT Communications Achieves Two Prestigious Certifications ISO /IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Reinforcing its Leadership in Broadband Service Provision
Telecom3 days agoNDPC Warns Content Creators Against Privacy Violations in Viral Videos
General News3 days agoFCCPC Launches Fuel Price Surveillance, Probes Airline Price Gouging, Resolves N10bn Complaints
















